0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I’ve read this a few times now, that we’re only operating in 3rd gear and when it comes together we’ll blow teams away.Two questions for those who’ve said/think like this:1. Why do you think we will suddenly go up a couple of levels? Is it based on our run last season? McCann being manager? The belief that our squad/starting eleven is that much better than everyone else?2. Why haven’t we reached those levels yet when we’re halfway through November? Bad luck? Poor tactics/team selection? Team still getting to know each other?I’ve been disappointed with us a fair bit this season, more with how we’ve played in games when I’ve seen us rather than our position, which I think is absolutely fine. But I’m not sure I share that optimism for any reason beyond hope so I’d be interested to hear why there’s that confidence there and what’s prevented us stepping up so far.
I read some stats this week about the effectiveness (or lack of) of shooting. It was on BBC site, football pages, discussing the disappearance of screamers. It was very interesting. This is only a rough number cos I can't remember the detail, but if you shoot from 12 yards (the penalty spot) about 1 in 7 or 8 will go in the net. Could do with someone finding that article though to firm up the numbers. So although we looked like we should have scored five Camps, statistically, we're about right. We need to shoot more....BobG
Certainly a tactical issue at home. We are underperforming our underlying numbers so that is compounding things as well BUT the underlying numbers aren’t good enough. Think I know what we need to improve and may have mentioned it before. I’ve seen the exact same issue before when Mansfield struggled to get promoted and I also know what/how they changed and how that allowed them to kick on.
Probably a result of falling short on the side of “fine margins”.Just seen the short highlights clip - Gibson (?) hits the inside of the post and the ball rebounds just in front of the line. If he hits the post a couple of cm to the left, then all bounces over the line. Then the first chance they showed, ironside inches away from meeting the cross.The other week, a couple of penalty shouts a.n.other ref might have given.Flip those over, over a few more games and the goals for column and points looks much better.
Quote from: IDM on November 16, 2024, 10:04:08 pmProbably a result of falling short on the side of “fine margins”.Just seen the short highlights clip - Gibson (?) hits the inside of the post and the ball rebounds just in front of the line. If he hits the post a couple of cm to the left, then all bounces over the line. Then the first chance they showed, ironside inches away from meeting the cross.The other week, a couple of penalty shouts a.n.other ref might have given.Flip those over, over a few more games and the goals for column and points looks much better.That shot of Gibson's, it would have needed millimetres to drop straight back for Ironside a tap in tbf.Yes, we were unlucky on a few counts, but again the keeper had nowhere near enough shots to save than what he should have, frustrating to say the least.
Our set pieces are definitely not an assets. Corners or either direct or indirect dead balls are usually very poor. We get a fair amount of wide set pieces because we play so much down the wings and we have decent players who draw fouls. We almost always totally waste these though. That seems the easiest thing to fix at present. It’s not like McGrath, Ironside and Olowu are without a threat.
In my opinion our crossing and set piece delivery is disgustingly poor of late. Think about our goal last week. A simple ball, a simple goal. We don’t do it anywhere near enough. How many balls did Joe, one of the best headers of a ball in the division, get to attack in the opposition box yesterday. I would say none!This leads me to a bee in my bonnet about players playing on the wrong side of the pitch. When it works it’s great. Moly has proved that in spells.Moly and Gibson were bang average yesterday. They looked like they had no clue what to do with the ball and their weaker feet are really quite poor. Hence their crossing was dreadful on the outside.So when it’s not working, why not mix it up and switch flanks and just go simple for a period of time with the instructions of ‘get to the byline and cross the ball in the box’ on their stronger foot? We have two of the best finishers in the div. They aren’t players that are going to run in behind very often.Hopefully the return of Maxwell will help this situation. He overlaps so much better. He’s arguably our best player and we miss him so much.We’re not at crisis point yet but its just frustration as we can see we’re so much better than what we’re showing against some very average teams. This league is poor and we could win it at a canter.
Quote from: Cramby10 on November 17, 2024, 08:57:32 amIn my opinion our crossing and set piece delivery is disgustingly poor of late. Think about our goal last week. A simple ball, a simple goal. We don’t do it anywhere near enough. How many balls did Joe, one of the best headers of a ball in the division, get to attack in the opposition box yesterday. I would say none!This leads me to a bee in my bonnet about players playing on the wrong side of the pitch. When it works it’s great. Moly has proved that in spells.Moly and Gibson were bang average yesterday. They looked like they had no clue what to do with the ball and their weaker feet are really quite poor. Hence their crossing was dreadful on the outside.So when it’s not working, why not mix it up and switch flanks and just go simple for a period of time with the instructions of ‘get to the byline and cross the ball in the box’ on their stronger foot? We have two of the best finishers in the div. They aren’t players that are going to run in behind very often.Hopefully the return of Maxwell will help this situation. He overlaps so much better. He’s arguably our best player and we miss him so much.We’re not at crisis point yet but its just frustration as we can see we’re so much better than what we’re showing against some very average teams. This league is poor and we could win it at a canter.Agreed, been saying this for a while, we don't get anywhere near enough crosses into the box for Sharp/Ironside, & when we do, they are, in the main, very very poor. We are doing well in the league, but there's still loads to work on, & I'm sure Grant will sort it.
Quote from: Lesonthewest on November 19, 2024, 08:56:50 amQuote from: Cramby10 on November 17, 2024, 08:57:32 amIn my opinion our crossing and set piece delivery is disgustingly poor of late. Think about our goal last week. A simple ball, a simple goal. We don’t do it anywhere near enough. How many balls did Joe, one of the best headers of a ball in the division, get to attack in the opposition box yesterday. I would say none!This leads me to a bee in my bonnet about players playing on the wrong side of the pitch. When it works it’s great. Moly has proved that in spells.Moly and Gibson were bang average yesterday. They looked like they had no clue what to do with the ball and their weaker feet are really quite poor. Hence their crossing was dreadful on the outside.So when it’s not working, why not mix it up and switch flanks and just go simple for a period of time with the instructions of ‘get to the byline and cross the ball in the box’ on their stronger foot? We have two of the best finishers in the div. They aren’t players that are going to run in behind very often.Hopefully the return of Maxwell will help this situation. He overlaps so much better. He’s arguably our best player and we miss him so much.We’re not at crisis point yet but its just frustration as we can see we’re so much better than what we’re showing against some very average teams. This league is poor and we could win it at a canter.Agreed, been saying this for a while, we don't get anywhere near enough crosses into the box for Sharp/Ironside, & when we do, they are, in the main, very very poor. We are doing well in the league, but there's still loads to work on, & I'm sure Grant will sort it.We’ve put more crosses onto the box than any other team this season.
Quote from: Cramby10 on November 17, 2024, 08:57:32 amIn my opinion our crossing and set piece delivery is disgustingly poor of late. Think about our goal last week. A simple ball, a simple goal. We don’t do it anywhere near enough. How many balls did Joe, one of the best headers of a ball in the division, get to attack in the opposition box yesterday. I would say none!This leads me to a bee in my bonnet about players playing on the wrong side of the pitch. When it works it’s great. Moly has proved that in spells.Moly and Gibson were bang average yesterday. They looked like they had no clue what to do with the ball and their weaker feet are really quite poor. Hence their crossing was dreadful on the outside.So when it’s not working, why not mix it up and switch flanks and just go simple for a period of time with the instructions of ‘get to the byline and cross the ball in the box’ on their stronger foot? We have two of the best finishers in the div. They aren’t players that are going to run in behind very often.Hopefully the return of Maxwell will help this situation. He overlaps so much better. He’s arguably our best player and we miss him so much.We’re not at crisis point yet but its just frustration as we can see we’re so much better than what we’re showing against some very average teams. This league is poor and we could win it at a canter.Agreed, been saying this for a while, we don't get anywhere near enough crosses into the box for Sharp/Ironside, & when we do, they are, in the main, very very poor. We are doing well in the league, but there's still loads to work on, & I'm sure Grant will sort it.
Quote from: GazLaz on November 19, 2024, 11:33:53 amQuote from: Lesonthewest on November 19, 2024, 08:56:50 amQuote from: Cramby10 on November 17, 2024, 08:57:32 amIn my opinion our crossing and set piece delivery is disgustingly poor of late. Think about our goal last week. A simple ball, a simple goal. We don’t do it anywhere near enough. How many balls did Joe, one of the best headers of a ball in the division, get to attack in the opposition box yesterday. I would say none!This leads me to a bee in my bonnet about players playing on the wrong side of the pitch. When it works it’s great. Moly has proved that in spells.Moly and Gibson were bang average yesterday. They looked like they had no clue what to do with the ball and their weaker feet are really quite poor. Hence their crossing was dreadful on the outside.So when it’s not working, why not mix it up and switch flanks and just go simple for a period of time with the instructions of ‘get to the byline and cross the ball in the box’ on their stronger foot? We have two of the best finishers in the div. They aren’t players that are going to run in behind very often.Hopefully the return of Maxwell will help this situation. He overlaps so much better. He’s arguably our best player and we miss him so much.We’re not at crisis point yet but its just frustration as we can see we’re so much better than what we’re showing against some very average teams. This league is poor and we could win it at a canter.Agreed, been saying this for a while, we don't get anywhere near enough crosses into the box for Sharp/Ironside, & when we do, they are, in the main, very very poor. We are doing well in the league, but there's still loads to work on, & I'm sure Grant will sort it.We’ve put more crosses onto the box than any other team this season. Are they effective crosses or crosses that go above players in the box or get blocked before they get to any of our players. Do our wide attacking forwards get to the by line to cross.
Quote from: Lesonthewest on November 19, 2024, 08:56:50 amQuote from: Cramby10 on November 17, 2024, 08:57:32 amIn my opinion our crossing and set piece delivery is disgustingly poor of late. Think about our goal last week. A simple ball, a simple goal. We don’t do it anywhere near enough. How many balls did Joe, one of the best headers of a ball in the division, get to attack in the opposition box yesterday. I would say none!This leads me to a bee in my bonnet about players playing on the wrong side of the pitch. When it works it’s great. Moly has proved that in spells.Moly and Gibson were bang average yesterday. They looked like they had no clue what to do with the ball and their weaker feet are really quite poor. Hence their crossing was dreadful on the outside.So when it’s not working, why not mix it up and switch flanks and just go simple for a period of time with the instructions of ‘get to the byline and cross the ball in the box’ on their stronger foot? We have two of the best finishers in the div. They aren’t players that are going to run in behind very often.Hopefully the return of Maxwell will help this situation. He overlaps so much better. He’s arguably our best player and we miss him so much.We’re not at crisis point yet but its just frustration as we can see we’re so much better than what we’re showing against some very average teams. This league is poor and we could win it at a canter.Agreed, been saying this for a while, we don't get anywhere near enough crosses into the box for Sharp/Ironside, & when we do, they are, in the main, very very poor. We are doing well in the league, but there's still loads to work on, & I'm sure Grant will sort it.We’ve put more crosses onto the box than any other team this season.
Quote from: Cramby10 on November 17, 2024, 08:57:32 amIn my opinion our crossing and set piece delivery is disgustingly poor of late. Think about our goal last week. A simple ball, a simple goal. We don’t do it anywhere near enough. How many balls did Joe, one of the best headers of a ball in the division, get to attack in the opposition box yesterday. I would say none!This leads me to a bee in my bonnet about players playing on the wrong side of the pitch. When it works it’s great. Moly has proved that in spells.Moly and Gibson were bang average yesterday. They looked like they had no clue what to do with the ball and their weaker feet are really quite poor. Hence their crossing was dreadful on the outside.So when it’s not working, why not mix it up and switch flanks and just go simple for a period of time with the instructions of ‘get to the byline and cross the ball in the box’ on their stronger foot? We have two of the best finishers in the div. They aren’t players that are going to run in behind very often.Hopefully the return of Maxwell will help this situation. He overlaps so much better. He’s arguably our best player and we miss him so much.We’re not at crisis point yet but its just frustration as we can see we’re so much better than what we’re showing against some very average teams. This league is poor and we could win it at a canter.Agreed, been saying this for a while, we don't get anywhere near enough crosses into the box for Sharp/Ironside, & when we do, they are, in the main, very very poor. We are doing well in the league, but there's still loads to work on, & I'm sure Grant will sort it.
We might put plenty of crosses in but for me the service is too often poor because we don’t make space for our wide players so everything they do is under pressure. Luke for instance is a top, top player when he is attacking with pace but how many times have we seen him double marked and trying to step inside a couple of defenders at walking pace and have the ball nipped off him and a break on, how many times are we trying to thread a cross through a wall of defenders, how many times are we asking one of the central defenders to play a wonder pass that rarely comes off. The big difference with last year for me is that, in different ways, Adelakun and Craig were masters at creating space and others flourished as a result: Joe benefited from improved service and central midfield became a threat rather than ball shufflers- Owen was developing into a real goal threat and Biggins became transformed. It’s perplexing because I really rate our squad and results show we are more than competitive but atm I think we are too predictable and don’t create enough genuine goal threats to be confident of top 3. Grant has proven that he can find a way but it will be fascinating to see what he thinks we need in January.