0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Even if it was a genuine attempt to play the ball, you just can’t do that at head height with an opponent close by. A header would have been OK and in the penalty box a punch.
Quote from: IDM on March 03, 2025, 11:12:31 amEven if it was a genuine attempt to play the ball, you just can’t do that at head height with an opponent close by. A header would have been OK and in the penalty box a punch. Horrific as Roberts' action was, I still maintain Schumacher-Battiston was worse - IIRC Schumacher changed his direction to collide with Battiston well after the ball had gone
Quote from: IDM on March 03, 2025, 11:12:31 amEven if it was a genuine attempt to play the ball, you just can’t do that at head height with an opponent close by. A header would have been OK and in the penalty box a punch. If the keeper goes in with his head what's to say the attackers not gonna put his foot in & try to nick the ball past? Keepers played the ball and protected himself I'd expect our keeper to do the same. Just unfortunate for me but you're entitled to your opinion
Quote from: andyst79 on March 03, 2025, 03:13:16 pmQuote from: IDM on March 03, 2025, 11:12:31 amEven if it was a genuine attempt to play the ball, you just can’t do that at head height with an opponent close by. A header would have been OK and in the penalty box a punch. If the keeper goes in with his head what's to say the attackers not gonna put his foot in & try to nick the ball past? Keepers played the ball and protected himself I'd expect our keeper to do the same. Just unfortunate for me but you're entitled to your opinion Would still be the same offence.Trying to play the ball at head height with the boot studs out is dangerous and reckless, when another player’s head is in close proximity. It’s not just an opinion it’s reality.
Quote from: IDM on March 03, 2025, 11:12:31 amEven if it was a genuine attempt to play the ball, you just can’t do that at head height with an opponent close by. A header would have been OK and in the penalty box a punch. If the keeper goes in with his head what's to say the attackers not gonna put his foot in & try to nick the ball past? Keepers played the ball and protected himself I'd expect our keeper to do the same. Just unfortunate for me but you're entitled to your opinion
Quote from: Dutch Uncle on March 03, 2025, 11:59:14 amQuote from: IDM on March 03, 2025, 11:12:31 amEven if it was a genuine attempt to play the ball, you just can’t do that at head height with an opponent close by. A header would have been OK and in the penalty box a punch. Horrific as Roberts' action was, I still maintain Schumacher-Battiston was worse - IIRC Schumacher changed his direction to collide with Battiston well after the ball had gone Agreed, hence the second worst challenge I have seen.And no VAR back then too..
I can’t do a link so can someone please put the clip of Jason Cousins, Wycombe Wanderers 25/9/93 the “tackle “ on David Moss. It’s the worst one I’ve seen on a Rovers player ever
Quote from: IDM on March 03, 2025, 04:18:50 pmQuote from: andyst79 on March 03, 2025, 03:13:16 pmQuote from: IDM on March 03, 2025, 11:12:31 amEven if it was a genuine attempt to play the ball, you just can’t do that at head height with an opponent close by. A header would have been OK and in the penalty box a punch. If the keeper goes in with his head what's to say the attackers not gonna put his foot in & try to nick the ball past? Keepers played the ball and protected himself I'd expect our keeper to do the same. Just unfortunate for me but you're entitled to your opinion Would still be the same offence.Trying to play the ball at head height with the boot studs out is dangerous and reckless, when another player’s head is in close proximity. It’s not just an opinion it’s reality.The ball was chest height when he played it with his studs facing down , it's the momentum after that's done the damage. Yes it's a red card but I personally don't think it was a malicious challenge as he was totally focused on the ball as he races out, and if it wasn't for the fact he needed 25 stitches in his ear I doubt much more would have been made of the incident.
Quote from: andyst79 on March 03, 2025, 03:13:16 pmQuote from: IDM on March 03, 2025, 11:12:31 amEven if it was a genuine attempt to play the ball, you just can’t do that at head height with an opponent close by. A header would have been OK and in the penalty box a punch. If the keeper goes in with his head what's to say the attackers not gonna put his foot in & try to nick the ball past? Keepers played the ball and protected himself I'd expect our keeper to do the same. Just unfortunate for me but you're entitled to your opinion Would still be the same offence.Trying to play the ball at head height with the boot studs out is dangerous and reckless, when another player’s head is in close proximity. It’s not just an opinion it’s reality.
Quote from: IDM on March 03, 2025, 11:12:31 amEven if it was a genuine attempt to play the ball, you just can’t do that at head height with an opponent close by. A header would have been OK and in the penalty box a punch. If the keeper goes in with his head what's to say the attackers not gonna put his foot in & try to nick the ball past? Keepers played the ball and protected himself I'd expect our keeper to do the same. Just unfortunate for me but you're entitled to your opinion
Quote from: andyst79 on March 03, 2025, 05:03:00 pmQuote from: IDM on March 03, 2025, 04:18:50 pmQuote from: andyst79 on March 03, 2025, 03:13:16 pmQuote from: IDM on March 03, 2025, 11:12:31 amEven if it was a genuine attempt to play the ball, you just can’t do that at head height with an opponent close by. A header would have been OK and in the penalty box a punch. If the keeper goes in with his head what's to say the attackers not gonna put his foot in & try to nick the ball past? Keepers played the ball and protected himself I'd expect our keeper to do the same. Just unfortunate for me but you're entitled to your opinion Would still be the same offence.Trying to play the ball at head height with the boot studs out is dangerous and reckless, when another player’s head is in close proximity. It’s not just an opinion it’s reality.The ball was chest height when he played it with his studs facing down , it's the momentum after that's done the damage. Yes it's a red card but I personally don't think it was a malicious challenge as he was totally focused on the ball as he races out, and if it wasn't for the fact he needed 25 stitches in his ear I doubt much more would have been made of the incident.It was being spoken about everywhere long before the stitches were done. He went for the ball no doubt, but it is still a ridiculous challenge
Maybe if the ref had given it immediately and sent him off there would have been less controversy. It was a challenge that should never have been made and though he never intended to hurt him he was out of control once he jumped in. Imagine if his studs had hit his eye instead of his ear.
Quote from: dickos1 on March 03, 2025, 11:02:29 pmQuote from: andyst79 on March 03, 2025, 05:03:00 pmQuote from: IDM on March 03, 2025, 04:18:50 pmQuote from: andyst79 on March 03, 2025, 03:13:16 pmQuote from: IDM on March 03, 2025, 11:12:31 amEven if it was a genuine attempt to play the ball, you just can’t do that at head height with an opponent close by. A header would have been OK and in the penalty box a punch. If the keeper goes in with his head what's to say the attackers not gonna put his foot in & try to nick the ball past? Keepers played the ball and protected himself I'd expect our keeper to do the same. Just unfortunate for me but you're entitled to your opinion Would still be the same offence.Trying to play the ball at head height with the boot studs out is dangerous and reckless, when another player’s head is in close proximity. It’s not just an opinion it’s reality.The ball was chest height when he played it with his studs facing down , it's the momentum after that's done the damage. Yes it's a red card but I personally don't think it was a malicious challenge as he was totally focused on the ball as he races out, and if it wasn't for the fact he needed 25 stitches in his ear I doubt much more would have been made of the incident.It was being spoken about everywhere long before the stitches were done. He went for the ball no doubt, but it is still a ridiculous challengeBeen given a further 3 match ban. It wasn’t a ridiculous challenge it was a dangerous one however, the flack he & his family are receiving on ‘the good old’ social platforms IS ridiculous.
Quote from: andyst79 on March 03, 2025, 05:03:00 pmQuote from: IDM on March 03, 2025, 04:18:50 pmQuote from: andyst79 on March 03, 2025, 03:13:16 pmQuote from: IDM on March 03, 2025, 11:12:31 amEven if it was a genuine attempt to play the ball, you just can’t do that at head height with an opponent close by. A header would have been OK and in the penalty box a punch. If the keeper goes in with his head what's to say the attackers not gonna put his foot in & try to nick the ball past? Keepers played the ball and protected himself I'd expect our keeper to do the same. Just unfortunate for me but you're entitled to your opinion Would still be the same offence.Trying to play the ball at head height with the boot studs out is dangerous and reckless, when another player’s head is in close proximity. It’s not just an opinion it’s reality.The ball was chest height when he played it with his studs facing down , it's the momentum after that's done the damage. Yes it's a red card but I personally don't think it was a malicious challenge as he was totally focused on the ball as he races out, and if it wasn't for the fact he needed 25 stitches in his ear I doubt much more would have been made of the incident.It was being spoken about everywhere long before the stitches were done. He went for the ball no doubt, but it is still a ridiculous challenge
Quote from: IDM on March 03, 2025, 04:18:50 pmQuote from: andyst79 on March 03, 2025, 03:13:16 pmQuote from: IDM on March 03, 2025, 11:12:31 amEven if it was a genuine attempt to play the ball, you just can’t do that at head height with an opponent close by. A header would have been OK and in the penalty box a punch. If the keeper goes in with his head what's to say the attackers not gonna put his foot in & try to nick the ball past? Keepers played the ball and protected himself I'd expect our keeper to do the same. Just unfortunate for me but you're entitled to your opinion Would still be the same offence.Trying to play the ball at head height with the boot studs out is dangerous and reckless, when another player’s head is in close proximity. It’s not just an opinion it’s reality.The ball was chest height when he played it with his studs facing down , it's the momentum after that's done the damage. Yes it's a red card but I personally don't think it was a malicious challenge as he was totally focused on the ball as he races out, and if it wasn't for the fact he needed 25 stitches in his ear I doubt much more would have been made of the incident.
Quote from: andyst79 on March 03, 2025, 03:13:16 pmQuote from: IDM on March 03, 2025, 11:12:31 amEven if it was a genuine attempt to play the ball, you just can’t do that at head height with an opponent close by. A header would have been OK and in the penalty box a punch. If the keeper goes in with his head what's to say the attackers not gonna put his foot in & try to nick the ball past? Keepers played the ball and protected himself I'd expect our keeper to do the same. Just unfortunate for me but you're entitled to your opinion Would still be the same offence.Trying to play the ball at head height with the boot studs out is dangerous and reckless, when another player’s head is in close proximity. It’s not just an opinion it’s reality.
Quote from: IDM on March 03, 2025, 11:12:31 amEven if it was a genuine attempt to play the ball, you just can’t do that at head height with an opponent close by. A header would have been OK and in the penalty box a punch. If the keeper goes in with his head what's to say the attackers not gonna put his foot in & try to nick the ball past? Keepers played the ball and protected himself I'd expect our keeper to do the same. Just unfortunate for me but you're entitled to your opinion