tingleyrover, PaulRover08 and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Best player in league 2, just entering his prime. I think it would be close to 1m
1 million wouldn't make a difference to the finances unfortunately. That'd be a small percentage of the wages for one year. Better off keeping him.
Quote from: dickos1 on April 19, 2025, 03:44:05 pmBest player in league 2, just entering his prime. I think it would be close to 1m Similar output to Will Evens that went to Mansfield in the summer. 20+ goals and similar age. 200k.
Quote from: GazLaz on April 19, 2025, 03:47:51 pmQuote from: dickos1 on April 19, 2025, 03:44:05 pmBest player in league 2, just entering his prime. I think it would be close to 1m Similar output to Will Evens that went to Mansfield in the summer. 20+ goals and similar age. 200k. Might be similar in age But he’d only ever played 90 league games and scored 23 goals Molyneux has played around 200 league games and scored double those goals. Much more experienced There is no way on this planet we would be selling him for 200k no chance
Quote from: Copps is Magic on April 19, 2025, 03:50:51 pm1 million wouldn't make a difference to the finances unfortunately. That'd be a small percentage of the wages for one year. Better off keeping him. 1m is about 20% of turnover! That’s a huge amount.
Quote from: GazLaz on April 19, 2025, 03:53:29 pmQuote from: Copps is Magic on April 19, 2025, 03:50:51 pm1 million wouldn't make a difference to the finances unfortunately. That'd be a small percentage of the wages for one year. Better off keeping him. 1m is about 20% of turnover! That’s a huge amount.Exactly. It would be momentary relief to one year's annual turnover.Longer term it's just not worth selling your (by far and away) best player, in his prime, for a figure that doesn't really make long term sense for the club's finances. Especially when we don't exactly have the most sophisticated youth setup to replace him. (If he himself was younger then situation would be different).You can quite easily calculate the effects on the playing side - because we'd be an average league two side without him. Now translate that into revenue, and I'm sure even after a short period of time pushing our luck at the higher end of league one would miles better financially.
Quote from: dickos1 on April 19, 2025, 04:03:42 pmQuote from: GazLaz on April 19, 2025, 03:47:51 pmQuote from: dickos1 on April 19, 2025, 03:44:05 pmBest player in league 2, just entering his prime. I think it would be close to 1m Similar output to Will Evens that went to Mansfield in the summer. 20+ goals and similar age. 200k. Might be similar in age But he’d only ever played 90 league games and scored 23 goals Molyneux has played around 200 league games and scored double those goals. Much more experienced There is no way on this planet we would be selling him for 200k no chance Whatever anyone thinks and says, Mols is over performing his underlying numbers. Most clubs are smart enough to recognise this these days. That will put them off paying over the odds. He’s not athletic enough and he’s not good enough off the ball (this is me with my scouts head on btw, especially if someone told me they were spending a million on him). I don’t think he will want to leave if we go up.
Quote from: Copps is Magic on April 19, 2025, 04:24:04 pmQuote from: GazLaz on April 19, 2025, 03:53:29 pmQuote from: Copps is Magic on April 19, 2025, 03:50:51 pm1 million wouldn't make a difference to the finances unfortunately. That'd be a small percentage of the wages for one year. Better off keeping him. 1m is about 20% of turnover! That’s a huge amount.Exactly. It would be momentary relief to one year's annual turnover.Longer term it's just not worth selling your (by far and away) best player, in his prime, for a figure that doesn't really make long term sense for the club's finances. Especially when we don't exactly have the most sophisticated youth setup to replace him. (If he himself was younger then situation would be different).You can quite easily calculate the effects on the playing side - because we'd be an average league two side without him. Now translate that into revenue, and I'm sure even after a short period of time pushing our luck at the higher end of league one would miles better financially.Say we sell him with two years left on his deal. That’s £500k per year. His contribution doesn’t equate to that return. It’s all about value and there is more value in getting £1m for LM than there is keeping him. That’s for sure.
I think molls is better at being “ the big fish in a small pond”.Not sure a move would benefit him tbh, he’s shining in an average team in my opinion.If a big money offer came in i wouldnt fault him or the club taking it.
I'm trying to think of any other season in all my time watching the Rovers where one individual has been so key to our fortunes. And I'm not coming up with anything. I get the argument for McIndoe in 03/04, but he was the final piece in the jigsaw. He turned a side that had bags of potential into absolute dominators. There were goals all through that side even without him. Blundell, Fortune-West, Brown, Akinfenwa and Green between them scored over 50 league goals in about 120 starts.Take Molyneux out of this side and I'm struggling to see us having options for hurting opponents.
Quote from: BillyStubbsTears on April 19, 2025, 12:59:58 pmI'm trying to think of any other season in all my time watching the Rovers where one individual has been so key to our fortunes. And I'm not coming up with anything. I get the argument for McIndoe in 03/04, but he was the final piece in the jigsaw. He turned a side that had bags of potential into absolute dominators. There were goals all through that side even without him. Blundell, Fortune-West, Brown, Akinfenwa and Green between them scored over 50 league goals in about 120 starts.Take Molyneux out of this side and I'm struggling to see us having options for hurting opponents. Colin Booth in 1962/63 I think it was. He was phenomenal for us, a real class or two above the rest.
Quote from: BillyStubbsTears on April 19, 2025, 12:59:58 pmI'm trying to think of any other season in all my time watching the Rovers where one individual has been so key to our fortunes. And I'm not coming up with anything. I get the argument for McIndoe in 03/04, but he was the final piece in the jigsaw. He turned a side that had bags of potential into absolute dominators. There were goals all through that side even without him. Blundell, Fortune-West, Brown, Akinfenwa and Green between them scored over 50 league goals in about 120 starts.Take Molyneux out of this side and I'm struggling to see us having options for hurting opponents. Ill thrown one in. Colin Cramb, 1996-97 season. Class player in an awful team. His goals was the difference for us staying up, albeit for one season after Uncle Ken threw his teddy out the pram.
Colin Booth also came on as the substitute for England u23s when Alick Jeffrey broke his leg.
What do we think we’d accept?£1m?