Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
September 29, 2025, 04:35:56 am

Login with username, password and session length

Links


Join the VSC


FSA logo

Author Topic: Striker  (Read 26970 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

In the box

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 790
Re: Striker
« Reply #30 on August 22, 2025, 11:12:03 pm by In the box »
You know what I would do? I'd ask Shrewsbury Town if they would be interested in Joe Ironside going there and super Johnny Marquis coming back to us.
I love "The Chief" but he's way down the pecking order at Rovers. He'd be playing every game for the Shrews.

Seriously!?
McCann says “I wouldn't bring them in willy-nilly. I've got three very good number nines at this moment in time so it's about making sure it's right.".
 So what’s the panic then .. 7 points from 4 games  not that bad is it ?



(want to hide these ads? Join the VSC today!)

ncRover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 5247
Re: Striker
« Reply #31 on August 22, 2025, 11:58:01 pm by ncRover »
Duncan Watmore would be my guess

Just conversations thought isn’t it? Been here before and nothing happens.
« Last Edit: August 23, 2025, 12:07:58 am by ncRover »

Alan Southstand

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 8332
Re: Striker
« Reply #32 on August 23, 2025, 06:07:51 am by Alan Southstand »
Adelukan? Is he still un-attached? Definitely offers something different and is more ruthless.
Not a No9, though, is he?

Chris Black come back

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 16002
Re: Striker
« Reply #33 on August 23, 2025, 06:16:37 am by Chris Black come back »
Think Watmore would be a wide player rather than no9. Guess he would be something different, which is what McCann was saying.

ncRover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 5247
Re: Striker
« Reply #34 on August 23, 2025, 07:06:09 am by ncRover »
Think Watmore would be a wide player rather than no9. Guess he would be something different, which is what McCann was saying.

Yeah can play wide or central. Think he’d be an interesting option if he’s still quick.

DearneValleyRover

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 7980
Re: Striker
« Reply #35 on August 23, 2025, 08:26:26 am by DearneValleyRover »
Lincoln have just signed a striker on loan from Everton, probably nothing in it

selby

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 12435
Re: Striker
« Reply #36 on August 23, 2025, 08:48:43 am by selby »
  Depends what the club want, are we looking for one long term who can improve or the oven ready that everyone is after .
  Not many good strikers are floating about as everyone wants them, Fletcher Holman at Wolves u21's would be my one for coming in and pushing what we have got, if we go for the oven ready then one if not two already here need to be shipped out, and other teams need to want them.

ncRover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 5247
Re: Striker
« Reply #37 on August 23, 2025, 09:20:42 am by ncRover »
Lincoln have just signed a striker on loan from Everton, probably nothing in it

Will be back up.

steve@dcfd

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 9951
Re: Striker
« Reply #38 on August 23, 2025, 11:38:35 am by steve@dcfd »
Lincoln have just signed a striker on loan from Everton, probably nothing in it
They signed him but have been monitoring this summer. They have sold a wide forward and lost another with injury so they brought him in quicker than they had planned.
If we wanted Street we should have paid the fee and wages we didnt. That’s what Plymouth have done for a to take a striker/forward
« Last Edit: August 23, 2025, 12:33:31 pm by steve@dcfd »

steve@dcfd

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 9951
Re: Striker
« Reply #39 on August 23, 2025, 11:43:39 am by steve@dcfd »
  Depends what the club want, are we looking for one long term who can improve or the oven ready that everyone is after .
  Not many good strikers are floating about as everyone wants them, Fletcher Holman at Wolves u21's would be my one for coming in and pushing what we have got, if we go for the oven ready then one if not two already here need to be shipped out, and other teams need to want them.
He’s on loan at Solihull Moors

IDM

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 21302
Re: Striker
« Reply #40 on August 23, 2025, 01:30:32 pm by IDM »
Lincoln have just signed a striker on loan from Everton, probably nothing in it
They signed him but have been monitoring this summer. They have sold a wide forward and lost another with injury so they brought him in quicker than they had planned.
If we wanted Street we should have paid the fee and wages we didnt. That’s what Plymouth have done for a to take a striker/forward

Maybe just maybe, Street wasn’t for sale.??

mpc123

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 936
Re: Striker
« Reply #41 on August 23, 2025, 01:36:19 pm by mpc123 »
Lincoln have just signed a striker on loan from Everton, probably nothing in it
They signed him but have been monitoring this summer. They have sold a wide forward and lost another with injury so they brought him in quicker than they had planned.
If we wanted Street we should have paid the fee and wages we didnt. That’s what Plymouth have done for a to take a striker/forward
I think they have  just signed a midfielder for 350k too, smashing their record

Dutch Uncle

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 7607
Re: Striker
« Reply #42 on August 23, 2025, 01:37:03 pm by Dutch Uncle »
Lincoln have just signed a striker on loan from Everton, probably nothing in it
They signed him but have been monitoring this summer. They have sold a wide forward and lost another with injury so they brought him in quicker than they had planned.
If we wanted Street we should have paid the fee and wages we didnt. That’s what Plymouth have done for a to take a striker/forward

Maybe just maybe, Street wasn’t for sale.??

You mean no Street Market? :lol:

DonnyBazR0ver

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 19838
Re: Striker
« Reply #43 on August 23, 2025, 01:52:03 pm by DonnyBazR0ver »
Lincoln have just signed a striker on loan from Everton, probably nothing in it
They signed him but have been monitoring this summer. They have sold a wide forward and lost another with injury so they brought him in quicker than they had planned.
If we wanted Street we should have paid the fee and wages we didnt. That’s what Plymouth have done for a to take a striker/forward

Maybe just maybe, Street wasn’t for sale.??

And doesn't want to move?

In the box

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 790
Re: Striker
« Reply #44 on August 23, 2025, 01:57:01 pm by In the box »
Lincoln have just signed a striker on loan from Everton, probably nothing in it
They signed him but have been monitoring this summer. They have sold a wide forward and lost another with injury so they brought him in quicker than they had planned.
If we wanted Street we should have paid the fee and wages we didnt. That’s what Plymouth have done for a to take a striker/forward

Maybe just maybe, Street wasn’t for sale.??

And doesn't want to move?
Show the proof !!

steve@dcfd

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 9951
Re: Striker
« Reply #45 on August 23, 2025, 01:58:27 pm by steve@dcfd »
Lincoln have just signed a striker on loan from Everton, probably nothing in it
They signed him but have been monitoring this summer. They have sold a wide forward and lost another with injury so they brought him in quicker than they had planned.
If we wanted Street we should have paid the fee and wages we didnt. That’s what Plymouth have done for a to take a striker/forward

Maybe just maybe, Street wasn’t for sale.??
4 first team players left this summer all to teams above Lincoln 2 free transfers and 2 sold.
Street wasn’t playing for them last year so I doubt if we have made them a very good offer we could have signed him before those players left the club

DonnyBazR0ver

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 19838
Re: Striker
« Reply #46 on August 23, 2025, 02:03:55 pm by DonnyBazR0ver »
Lincoln have just signed a striker on loan from Everton, probably nothing in it
They signed him but have been monitoring this summer. They have sold a wide forward and lost another with injury so they brought him in quicker than they had planned.
If we wanted Street we should have paid the fee and wages we didnt. That’s what Plymouth have done for a to take a striker/forward

Maybe just maybe, Street wasn’t for sale.??

And doesn't want to move?
Show the proof !!

Proof of what?

steve@dcfd

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 9951
Re: Striker
« Reply #47 on August 23, 2025, 02:06:58 pm by steve@dcfd »
Yet again Ironside not in the squad today and Hanlan as yet failing to prove he’s worth a start. We rely on Billy. We should have gone for Street and paid the price

Ldr

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 3218
Re: Striker
« Reply #48 on August 23, 2025, 02:12:07 pm by Ldr »
Yet again Ironside not in the squad today and Hanlan as yet failing to prove he’s worth a start. We rely on Billy. We should have gone for Street and paid the price

Assume you know for certain we didn’t try and get street then?

IDM

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 21302
Re: Striker
« Reply #49 on August 23, 2025, 02:16:44 pm by IDM »
And I say again, he might not have been for sale.  Just because we may want him, doesn’t mean we can get him.  And you don’t know what we may or may not have offered, do you.?

If only life were that simple.!

steve@dcfd

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 9951
Re: Striker
« Reply #50 on August 23, 2025, 02:23:05 pm by steve@dcfd »
Excuses are coming Rob scored 12 goals in 22 games with his contract I would expect a fee to be large which could have put us off. But we may have gone for him but did offer the right fee. So now we brought in a striker on a 2 year contract that at the moment as not worked and we are looking at another otherwise this thread would not exist.

Barmby Rover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 5215
Re: Striker
« Reply #51 on August 23, 2025, 02:30:23 pm by Barmby Rover »
Excuses are coming Rob scored 12 goals in 22 games with his contract I would expect a fee to be large which could have put us off. But we may have gone for him but did offer the right fee. So now we brought in a striker on a 2 year contract that at the moment as not worked and we are looking at another otherwise this thread would not exist.

I think we have to be a bit more patient with Hanlan, it takes a bit of time for some players, Mols was not an immediate hit, it took him a full season to get the system.

andyst79

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 1835
Re: Striker
« Reply #52 on August 23, 2025, 02:37:36 pm by andyst79 »
Don't think Grant fancies him tbh and us in for another striker makes me think he's realised he's not up to the task. Sharp  did well against Huddersfield and with the chances we've been creating hopefully he finds the back of the net today

Chris Black come back

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 16002
Re: Striker
« Reply #53 on August 23, 2025, 03:25:04 pm by Chris Black come back »
Street dropped to bench today for Lincoln City.

Padge_DRFC

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 5755
Re: Striker
« Reply #54 on August 23, 2025, 03:50:09 pm by Padge_DRFC »
Street dropped to bench today for Lincoln City.

Punishment for meeting McCann midweek

Fal

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 792
Re: Striker
« Reply #55 on August 23, 2025, 04:11:57 pm by Fal »
Street dropped to bench today for Lincoln City.

Punishment for meeting McCann midweek


My dad who apparently has a contact too said he met Street and Roofe this week, thought it was a load of shite until you just mentioned it aswell.


Can’t see Street coming back unless we pay mega bucks

drfchound

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 33979
Re: Striker
« Reply #56 on August 23, 2025, 04:19:32 pm by drfchound »
Street was a perfect fit for our way of playing in the second half of the season.

Drover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 4351
Re: Striker
« Reply #57 on August 23, 2025, 04:39:51 pm by Drover »
IF and its a big IF Lincoln are prepared to sell Street,I believe TB would match GM's ambition and provide the funds for him,But I don't  think they will want to sell him.Hope I'm wrong.

IDM

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 21302
Re: Striker
« Reply #58 on August 23, 2025, 05:09:40 pm by IDM »
Excuses are coming Rob scored 12 goals in 22 games with his contract I would expect a fee to be large which could have put us off. But we may have gone for him but did offer the right fee. So now we brought in a striker on a 2 year contract that at the moment as not worked and we are looking at another otherwise this thread would not exist.

Who is making excuses, and for what.?

I expect you, I, and virtually everyone on here has no idea what has been discussed between the club and players..

DonnyBazR0ver

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 19838
Re: Striker
« Reply #59 on August 23, 2025, 05:17:47 pm by DonnyBazR0ver »
Street dropped to bench today for Lincoln City.

Punishment for meeting McCann midweek


My dad who apparently has a contact too said he met Street and Roofe this week, thought it was a load of shite until you just mentioned it aswell.


Can’t see Street coming back unless we pay mega bucks

As much as I want to believe it, he's under contract at Lincoln and we would have to get permission from them before we could speak to him. Not saying we haven't like, but guess we would have had to submit a bid before that could happen. Again, not saying we haven't but from how McCann talked about the meetings doesn't give me confidence one is Street.

 

TinyPortal © 2005-2012