Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
September 29, 2025, 08:21:25 am

Login with username, password and session length

Links


Join the VSC


FSA logo

Author Topic: Striker  (Read 27013 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Ryaldinhio

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 1086
Re: Striker
« Reply #60 on August 23, 2025, 05:20:54 pm by Ryaldinhio »
We have a spare loan place and GM usually maximises all of them.

I think GM is playing sharp so much as a bit of a show that he needs someone else.

Personally I would have no issues starting with Billy all season IF we played to his strengths.



(want to hide these ads? Join the VSC today!)

steve@dcfd

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 9951
Re: Striker
« Reply #61 on August 23, 2025, 05:33:18 pm by steve@dcfd »
Let’s stop talking about Street he’s not coming I agree with DBR we would have had to have permission.

DonnyOsmond

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 12346
Re: Striker
« Reply #62 on August 23, 2025, 05:39:33 pm by DonnyOsmond »
I doubt he'd have come off the bench if they were likely to sell or loan him this week.

Although I do think he's a decent player for a McCann team, and we brings attributes that were currently lacking in pace in central areas, unless Hanlan shows it. Also noticed before today's game we were top of the list when it comes to crosses made, so it would be nice to get someone with his height to get onto the end of them.

DearneValleyRover

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 7980
Re: Striker
« Reply #63 on August 23, 2025, 06:07:23 pm by DearneValleyRover »
Grant has stated that both players have just become available which implies that both are presently employed

Smyth

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 418
Re: Striker
« Reply #64 on August 23, 2025, 06:11:52 pm by Smyth »
Macaulay Langstaff didn't get included in the Millwall squad today, he has the required connection to the North East too
« Last Edit: August 23, 2025, 06:15:00 pm by Smyth »

mpc123

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 936
Re: Striker
« Reply #65 on August 23, 2025, 06:12:09 pm by mpc123 »
Maybe their contracts from last year just didn't get renewed, maybe they signed for a club this time last year.

I'd be very surprised if it was Streete.

mushRTID

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 8137
Re: Striker
« Reply #66 on August 23, 2025, 06:16:11 pm by mushRTID »
Macaulay Langstaff didn't get included in the Millwall squad today, he has the required connection to the North East too

That is a great shout.

Chris Black come back

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 16002
Re: Striker
« Reply #67 on August 23, 2025, 06:45:55 pm by Chris Black come back »
He’s on a long term deal and Millwall paid a decent fee for him. I’m not sure we could pick up his wages as a loan, or offer a fee sufficient to tempt them. He will be on at least 10k a week you would imagine, probably closer to 15k.

DonnyOsmond

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 12346
Re: Striker
« Reply #68 on August 23, 2025, 06:48:51 pm by DonnyOsmond »
Maybe their contracts from last year just didn't get renewed, maybe they signed for a club this time last year.

I'd be very surprised if it was Streete.

Theo?

ncRover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 5247
Re: Striker
« Reply #69 on August 23, 2025, 08:17:43 pm by ncRover »
We have a spare loan place and GM usually maximises all of them.

I think GM is playing sharp so much as a bit of a show that he needs someone else.

Personally I would have no issues starting with Billy all season IF we played to his strengths.

Well it was McCann who rubber stamped Hanlan on a two year contract.

Ryaldinhio

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 1086
Re: Striker
« Reply #70 on August 23, 2025, 08:21:23 pm by Ryaldinhio »
We have a spare loan place and GM usually maximises all of them.

I think GM is playing sharp so much as a bit of a show that he needs someone else.

Personally I would have no issues starting with Billy all season IF we played to his strengths.

Well it was McCann who rubber stamped Hanlan on a two year contract.

Yes, and?


Nudga

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 6621
Re: Striker
« Reply #71 on August 23, 2025, 08:23:41 pm by Nudga »
We have a spare loan place and GM usually maximises all of them.

I think GM is playing sharp so much as a bit of a show that he needs someone else.

Personally I would have no issues starting with Billy all season IF we played to his strengths.

Well it was McCann who rubber stamped Hanlan on a two year contract.

Could be a simple case as Hanlan struggling to settle into the area. A move up North isn't for everyone.

drfchound

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 33982
Re: Striker
« Reply #72 on August 23, 2025, 08:29:16 pm by drfchound »
We have a spare loan place and GM usually maximises all of them.

I think GM is playing sharp so much as a bit of a show that he needs someone else.

Personally I would have no issues starting with Billy all season IF we played to his strengths.

Well it was McCann who rubber stamped Hanlan on a two year contract.

Could be a simple case as Hanlan struggling to settle into the area. A move up North isn't for everyone.

Agreed.
That is something that lots of people don’t even consider when players don’t look great at first.

Chris Black come back

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 16002
Re: Striker
« Reply #73 on August 23, 2025, 09:13:04 pm by Chris Black come back »
He's largely played in his career as a wide or wider player. He's now being asked to play right down the middle. This will take time getting used to.
« Last Edit: August 23, 2025, 09:23:43 pm by Chris Black come back »

ncRover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 5247
Re: Striker
« Reply #74 on August 23, 2025, 09:22:52 pm by ncRover »
We have a spare loan place and GM usually maximises all of them.

I think GM is playing sharp so much as a bit of a show that he needs someone else.

Personally I would have no issues starting with Billy all season IF we played to his strengths.

Well it was McCann who rubber stamped Hanlan on a two year contract.

Yes, and?

Being stubborn with team selection to make a point like that is something managers do when they aren’t getting backed.

There’s three strikers contracted at the club thanks to the chairman’s money because that’s what Grant wanted.

I also think Grant would make whatever decision was right in the moment to win the game of football.

DonnyBazR0ver

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 19838
Re: Striker
« Reply #75 on August 23, 2025, 09:51:21 pm by DonnyBazR0ver »
Let’s stop talking about Street he’s not coming I agree with DBR we would have had to have permission.


Although Steve, there could be another scenario where incoming could be being balanced against outgoing with associated fees.

There are lots of players considering moves right now in the run up to the close of the window. As we know, some moves are dependant on others, when the chain reaction starts.

We may not have considered losing one of our better players, but if this is offset by bringing in another of 'equal' value going forward, then anything can happen. 

Alan Southstand

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 8332
Re: Striker
« Reply #76 on August 23, 2025, 10:45:29 pm by Alan Southstand »
Grant has stated that both players have just become available which implies that both are presently employed
He also stated that they could be either loan or permanent. My take on that is that one of the 2 is possibly a loan (I see ManU have recently made one of their U21 strikers available for loan and we have contact there with TR).
The other could be at a Club where they have recently signed a striker and he’s become available.
Both guys are being looked at by other Clubs, so, as Grant says, it’s complicated, which could mean we may get neither!

les@donr

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 4424
Re: Striker
« Reply #77 on August 24, 2025, 02:35:44 am by les@donr »
Street on bench today might not be liking life back at Lincoln. Terry might be willing to spend some of his money to bring Street back to Rovers. Could be the difference between getting and not getting promoted.

Fal

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 792
Re: Striker
« Reply #78 on August 24, 2025, 10:01:13 am by Fal »
Think the problem with Street at Lincoln is that he isn’t the main man and they play him on the wing. Maybe that is what McCann is trying to sell him by telling him he’s the main man.

The difference when we moved him there was phenomenal but maybe he just knows he ain’t getting in front of Collins (I think) over there.


He suits our playstyle better methinks but if I was McCann I would be knocking Terrys door down to go all out for it however if if I’m being honest I can’t see him coming back at least not this season.

Ryaldinhio

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 1086
Re: Striker
« Reply #79 on August 24, 2025, 10:05:32 am by Ryaldinhio »
Maybe he isn't fancied at Lincoln but has been playing to make it look that he is, improve value but ultimately willing to sell. Who knows.

There are lots of teams that play chess with players during the transfer window, put them in the shop window, affect valuation. It's not always about results on the pitch.

I think window should shut before first game of season personally.

RugbyRover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 1024
Re: Striker
« Reply #80 on August 24, 2025, 10:48:56 am by RugbyRover »
Jack Marriott?
Surplus at Wrexham?
Posh connection?

Chris Black come back

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 16002
Re: Striker
« Reply #81 on August 26, 2025, 01:32:16 pm by Chris Black come back »
Jack Marriott?
Surplus at Wrexham?
Posh connection?


Off to Reading I think.

Askern Rover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 25
Re: Striker
« Reply #82 on August 26, 2025, 03:22:34 pm by Askern Rover »
I see Lincoln have just signed another winger

Fal

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 792
Re: Striker
« Reply #83 on August 26, 2025, 03:42:17 pm by Fal »
I see Lincoln have just signed another winger

Apparently can play right wing or right back, seems odd though when they have enough forward players since they describe him as a forward on their website.

Dutch Uncle

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 7607
Re: Striker
« Reply #84 on August 26, 2025, 03:47:11 pm by Dutch Uncle »
I have no idea or any information, but I will point out that there have been times before when we have signed a player on a 'permanent' when we all thought there was no chance whatsoever. Billy Sharp (in 2010) and Matt Mills spring to mind.


 (apologies I am a pedant, a 2 or 3 year contract is not 'permanent'. I would prefer something like 'signed outright' or 'on an x-year contract'  :lol:)

donnyguy

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 656
Re: Striker
« Reply #85 on August 26, 2025, 04:25:53 pm by donnyguy »
According to sports boom on x I’ve no idea if they are reliable rovers are after getting Rob street back

In the box

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 790
Re: Striker
« Reply #86 on August 26, 2025, 04:44:50 pm by In the box »
Lincoln have just signed a striker on loan from Everton, probably nothing in it
They signed him but have been monitoring this summer. They have sold a wide forward and lost another with injury so they brought him in quicker than they had planned.
If we wanted Street we should have paid the fee and wages we didnt. That’s what Plymouth have done for a to take a striker/forward

Maybe just maybe, Street wasn’t for sale.??

And doesn't want to move?
Show the proof !!

Proof of what?
That Street didn’t want leave Lincoln or come to Donny . Just speculation. We I think will have enquired but I can only SPECULATE he was on a price we couldn’t budge for as IMO he was better player by the time we got promoted than when he joined on loan .. so one can only SPECULATE he would have liked to join .. BUT ..

IDM

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 21302
Re: Striker
« Reply #87 on August 26, 2025, 04:49:37 pm by IDM »
According to sports boom on x I’ve no idea if they are reliable rovers are after getting Rob street back

Probably fuelled by folks like us saying we want him back.!

In the box

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 790
Re: Striker
« Reply #88 on August 26, 2025, 05:02:13 pm by In the box »
According to sports boom on x I’ve no idea if they are reliable rovers are after getting Rob street back

Probably fuelled by folks like us saying we want him back.!
Thats probably nearer the truth .

Usher wide.

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 961
Re: Striker
« Reply #89 on August 26, 2025, 05:35:32 pm by Usher wide. »
Rob Street is on a long contract at a club in the same division as us who forked out a 5 figure fee for him before he came to us as a loanee & was highly successful here.

Lincoln, even if they contemplated letting Rob go, would be looking for £1 million plus, probably nearer £1.5 plus.

I think that’s a ‘big ask’ from Terry along with his wages.

Can’t (as much as I would love it to) see it happening.

 

TinyPortal © 2005-2012