0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Stewmaiden79 on September 07, 2025, 01:16:45 pmYeah, I wonder where the 10% figure comes from . The police, Rovers? Safety officer i’d presume. Making the SS reserved seating would make sense to me next season. Singers can locate in the areas they are currently as they are majority season ticket holders anyway.
Yeah, I wonder where the 10% figure comes from . The police, Rovers?
I think we do need to look at maximising the number of seats without compromising safety but keeping the benefits of unallocated seating, as well as potentially expanding into the corners. If we can find a way to be smarter by looking back and assessing, on average how many seats or people remain short of the allowed capacity (I.e less the 10%) with a view to reducing the wasted spots. As it stands, unless folk let the club know they won't be attending, then the seats can't be resold. I understand this is getting better but maybe more can be done to formalise the process. Obviously we can't oversubscribe and sell more tickets than the allowed capacity, but once we get some data together, it might be worth challenging SAG to find say another 100 spaces that we can sell. For example. Say the 10% is about 300 but on average 100 ST holders aren't turning up, then we have 400 empty places. So, if we reduce the buffer by 100, can we then assume we would still meeting the safety and comfort requirement ? As others have said, and S_M maybe alludes to , can that 10% be reduced to say 7.5% or 5%?? Probably an item for the Shadow Board and SAG to gather evidence and examine.
Quote from: DonnyBazR0ver on September 07, 2025, 02:31:11 pmI think we do need to look at maximising the number of seats without compromising safety but keeping the benefits of unallocated seating, as well as potentially expanding into the corners. If we can find a way to be smarter by looking back and assessing, on average how many seats or people remain short of the allowed capacity (I.e less the 10%) with a view to reducing the wasted spots. As it stands, unless folk let the club know they won't be attending, then the seats can't be resold. I understand this is getting better but maybe more can be done to formalise the process. Obviously we can't oversubscribe and sell more tickets than the allowed capacity, but once we get some data together, it might be worth challenging SAG to find say another 100 spaces that we can sell. For example. Say the 10% is about 300 but on average 100 ST holders aren't turning up, then we have 400 empty places. So, if we reduce the buffer by 100, can we then assume we would still meeting the safety and comfort requirement ? As others have said, and S_M maybe alludes to , can that 10% be reduced to say 7.5% or 5%?? Probably an item for the Shadow Board and SAG to gather evidence and examine. That’s exactly the sort of thing we need to be looking at.I’m pretty sure for some it’s south stand or not at all so we need to maximise availability there.
Thinking about it. Another possibility is to put the away fans in a side area and replicate the south in the north. Perhaps one to hi k about next season? Might be advantages for our players to attack towards home fans both halves.
Quote from: sf9944 on September 07, 2025, 03:58:12 pmQuote from: DonnyBazR0ver on September 07, 2025, 02:31:11 pmI think we do need to look at maximising the number of seats without compromising safety but keeping the benefits of unallocated seating, as well as potentially expanding into the corners. If we can find a way to be smarter by looking back and assessing, on average how many seats or people remain short of the allowed capacity (I.e less the 10%) with a view to reducing the wasted spots. As it stands, unless folk let the club know they won't be attending, then the seats can't be resold. I understand this is getting better but maybe more can be done to formalise the process. Obviously we can't oversubscribe and sell more tickets than the allowed capacity, but once we get some data together, it might be worth challenging SAG to find say another 100 spaces that we can sell. For example. Say the 10% is about 300 but on average 100 ST holders aren't turning up, then we have 400 empty places. So, if we reduce the buffer by 100, can we then assume we would still meeting the safety and comfort requirement ? As others have said, and S_M maybe alludes to , can that 10% be reduced to say 7.5% or 5%?? Probably an item for the Shadow Board and SAG to gather evidence and examine. That’s exactly the sort of thing we need to be looking at.I’m pretty sure for some it’s south stand or not at all so we need to maximise availability there.I would think most folk would choose West or East as an alternative but there are those friends, family etc, who we've discussed going to a match, but then find out they can't sit with you, so it becomes a deal breaker. This happened to our group in the West before. The advantage with the South is that isn't a problem. I'd be shocked if many folk aren't turning up at all if the South Stands sold out, but let us know if you know different.
Didn’t really come into play as we didn’t sell out, but the sterile area in the NW corner seemed a bit OTT especially as they shut off entrance from the concourse
Those two corners need serious thought ..they look awful on Tv and the empty home seats represent at least 15 % of stadium potential income.The North stand needs to give full allocation rights to the away fans.It is nonsensical to refuse business .
I would love to see safe standing barriers in the top 1/3 of the south, S/E and S/W
Quote from: sf9944 on September 07, 2025, 04:01:25 pmThinking about it. Another possibility is to put the away fans in a side area and replicate the south in the north. Perhaps one to hi k about next season? Might be advantages for our players to attack towards home fans both halves.Great idea. I wonder what the logistics are to give half the often under populated East Stand to away fans selling block by block from the corner flag along to the middle. Home fans behind each goal would be a smart move.
We’ve sold it that way before, and it does make far better sense all around to have away fans in the East. Also from a TV perspective it would look better.I wonder if the club could afford to have another lower priced ticket stand like the South?
Quote from: jmt23 on September 09, 2025, 02:22:59 amWe’ve sold it that way before, and it does make far better sense all around to have away fans in the East. Also from a TV perspective it would look better.I wonder if the club could afford to have another lower priced ticket stand like the South?Problem is, there’s no evidence of the demand for it.It’s also a lot of years since this type of configuration was done. They’ve always put away fans in the north west part of the north stand on the rare few occasions it’s been needed.
I don’t really disagree with anything that’s been said and I think it’s a good debate for us all to have. We, as loyal fans and customers have a lot to offer to that debate.Demand is an interesting issue and it might be worth a bit of market research. Whilst the demand might not be there yet it would be as well for the club to be one step ahead in terms of planning for when it is. I concede that they probably are by the way.I agree we should look towards evolution rather than revolution as we (hopefully) continue to increase supporter numbers. Also that more supporter led initiatives to get new fans in is very important. Where’s Donnybob at?
If all of the South stand brought an extra, fan where would they sit?It often sells out now so there is no extra room for fans. Would they be prepared to move to east or west stands to sit with their friends?There would be a lot of disappointed regular fans unless they have a season ticket.Would it be possible to start a crowd funder effort to raise money for rail seating/safe standing? I would chip in and if we raised a decent sum the club might match it or expand on the area used.
Quote from: idler on September 09, 2025, 10:51:28 amIf all of the South stand brought an extra, fan where would they sit?It often sells out now so there is no extra room for fans. Would they be prepared to move to east or west stands to sit with their friends?There would be a lot of disappointed regular fans unless they have a season ticket.Would it be possible to start a crowd funder effort to raise money for rail seating/safe standing? I would chip in and if we raised a decent sum the club might match it or expand on the area used.Well they are some of the questions we raised earlier in the thread. We're not going to gain much if anything from rail seating anyway, except alot of extra cost so we have to look at maximising what we've got. Research is required and the involvement of fans including the Black Bank and shadow board to address these issues. One of the things we need to establish is how many tickets we are selling in the South compared to how many are going through the turnstiles and actually attending...for every game over a relevant period.
Rail seating would increase the capacity would it?I've also heard the north stand is even further back from the pitch than the south stand. Leave away fans in the crap part. Shame we can't also bring that stand closer to the pitch. Probably only West Ham that has their first row so far from the pitch in modern stadiums