Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 07, 2026, 10:13:53 am

Login with username, password and session length

Links


Join the VSC


FSA logo

Author Topic: Haks  (Read 1548 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Thorney

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 1367
Haks
« on March 07, 2026, 05:35:09 pm by Thorney »
Cannot be a happy man.

Only outfield player not to get on the field. And probably one of the only players with that bit of quality that can change a game.

Can see him leaving in the summer, contract teminated by mutual agreement.

Doesnt look the type of player to take being left out well at all.



(want to hide these ads? Join the VSC today!)

dknward2

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 8486
Re: Haks
« Reply #1 on March 07, 2026, 05:37:53 pm by dknward2 »
Maybe down to Ramadan grant avoiding day games but will start him on Tuesday night after he had chance to eat

Plumbster

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 603
Re: Haks
« Reply #2 on March 07, 2026, 06:06:07 pm by Plumbster »
I was disappointed he didn’t come on- he might be half fit and out of form but I still thought he was the best hope on the bench to make something happen.  I thought Hanlan was immense in getting us up the pitch.

Chris Black come back

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 16690
Re: Haks
« Reply #3 on March 07, 2026, 06:08:50 pm by Chris Black come back »
Hanlan did ok in the horrific role of holding the ball up. Obviously no balls behind for him to run on to, an actual strength of his.

In the box

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 1087
Re: Haks
« Reply #4 on March 07, 2026, 06:21:02 pm by In the box »
Maybe down to Ramadan grant avoiding day games but will start him on Tuesday night after he had chance to eat
What was the point in signing a player if he can’t play at some point ??

GazLaz

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 15393
Re: Haks
« Reply #5 on March 07, 2026, 06:26:38 pm by GazLaz »
Didn’t like the 18 months deal for Hakeeb. Going back to him looked like a lack of ideas. If he was brought in to improve the team he should be playing though. No excuse for there being any surprises from him, the staff know him inside out. Maybe he was brought in as a 4th choice winger, who knows.

Usher wide.

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 1295
Re: Haks
« Reply #6 on March 08, 2026, 10:10:08 am by Usher wide. »
Didn’t like the 18 months deal for Hakeeb. Going back to him looked like a lack of ideas. If he was brought in to improve the team he should be playing though. No excuse for there being any surprises from him, the staff know him inside out. Maybe he was brought in as a 4th choice winger, who knows.

Haks wouldn’t have signed just until the end of this season, if we wanted him we had to show commitment & give him 18 months but yes, he should be accommodated in the side. He’s like Lee in that he can give you that ‘something different’ going forward.

We have to find a way to hurt Luton, give them something different to think about. Long balls up to Hanlan or Sharp doesn’t cut it. Sharp needs good balls played quickly into the box where his positional sense can get us goals. I don’t know what Hanlan needs.


TonySoprano

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 1856
Re: Haks
« Reply #7 on March 08, 2026, 10:12:18 am by TonySoprano »
Should have been a pay as you play deal

grayx

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 2506
Re: Haks
« Reply #8 on March 08, 2026, 10:19:48 am by grayx »
Should have been a pay as you play deal
He wouldnt have agreed to it

Janso

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 2270
Re: Haks
« Reply #9 on March 08, 2026, 10:53:11 am by Janso »
Should have been a pay as you play deal

People often mention these but I'm sceptical this actually exists in the professional game.

GazLaz

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 15393
Re: Haks
« Reply #10 on March 08, 2026, 10:54:08 am by GazLaz »
Should have been a pay as you play deal

They don’t really exist.

ncRover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 5712
Re: Haks
« Reply #11 on March 08, 2026, 03:19:52 pm by ncRover »
Should have been a pay as you play deal

Why? He’s not playing because he’s not getting picked, not because he’s injury prone or unprofessional.

« Last Edit: March 08, 2026, 03:21:58 pm by ncRover »

 

TinyPortal © 2005-2012