0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Would it be a good idea if members of this forum had their date of birth on their profiles so readers can identify whether some of the posts are the work of uneducated kids, or adults with learning difficulties?
Nah - but Bob G is old and when younger could certainly have passed for ginger In my view: Old bas**rds are seldom knowingly wrong, and young t**ts are seldom knowingly right ..... and then there's the fat fcukers who are always right (about pies & lager) but then there's the Welsh ....
Does being 22 or 62 make your opinion less valid then?
I thought it was the ladies who were supposed to be squeamish about revealing their age..lolI always tend to think perhaps there is a clue in the numbers some posters carry in their names ? 45 and three quarters btw
I'm not for or against it,I let the moderators decide what they feel is needed and will obey by their decision but what If this was implemented,whats to stop the new users who do not want their age to be known registering with a false age?Hence the reason behind it being pointless?
jucyberry wrote:QuoteI thought it was the ladies who were supposed to be squeamish about revealing their age..lolI always tend to think perhaps there is a clue in the numbers some posters carry in their names ? 45 and three quarters btw I always thought you were younger than me! :dry:
Class Mr. Bullet! Class! Irony, sarcasm, wit, general good humour and 'been round the block with DRFC enough times-isms!' Very amusing post indeed! Well played sir!
My Poster ID gies the lot away! Aries, a Friday and a year of the Rabbit! Wonder what that points to?
Bentley Bullet wrote:Quotejucyberry wrote:QuoteI thought it was the ladies who were supposed to be squeamish about revealing their age..lolI always tend to think perhaps there is a clue in the numbers some posters carry in their names ? 45 and three quarters btw I always thought you were younger than me! :dry:lol, just call me perfectly preserved..