Viking Supporters Co-operative
Viking Chat => Viking Chat => Topic started by: esdailles left foot on May 18, 2019, 12:10:38 am
-
If we had got to Wembley, who do you think would have played in goal ?
-
Can it.
If that's the best you can do, go to f**king bed.
-
Idiot
-
What's your beef ?. Just a question as I genuinely believe Lawlor would have played. What's with the overreaction to everything I post
-
Idiot
Would you like to discuss it to my face ?
-
As previously posted. Go to bed.
-
If we had got to Wembley, who do you think would have played in goal ?
Go away numpty, piss poor WUM
-
If we had got to Wembley, who do you think would have played in goal ?
Marosi..
He did nowt wrong tonight and he saved a penalty..
He slipped for their goal..
I for one am getting bored with your constant negativity..
You clearly don’t support DRFC so perhaps you should leave quietly, and don’t come back.?
-
I've supported them longer than you. A lot longer. Marco is a good shot stopper no doubt about it. But he's made far too many errors and I'm sure Grant knows it. In my opinion IF we had got to Wembley Lawlor would have played. What is wrong with that suggestion
-
You are probably right but we will never ever know. It will be the same as the rained off Charlton game - we will never know if we would have won
Or the Martin Woods pen at Newcastle - the score would have changed if he had scored but would the result have altered
Would the score have been different if Ref had given us a Free Kick at Sunderland a minute before they scored (when JM was fouled) or given us a Penalty when Ozturk wrestled Butler to the floor for a cast iron stonewall penalty ?
In truth we will never know BUT you will probably be able to guess what might have happened at Wembley (but not 100%) if Lawlor comes back as Number 1 Keeper next Season and MM leaves the Club - BUT you will never know for sure
-
ELF !
Some on here really don’t know how to answer an enquiry or question...
They react rather than engage and this probably says more about them than you!
So in answer to your enquiry...
I believe GM would have stuck with Marosi rather than letting Lawlor steal the day....Marosi for all his faults had weathered this journey to the play offs and deserves his place,..
however,
I do feel a bit safer with Lawlor between the sticks, but only a bit.....
Thank god it’s not my call...
-
Marosi cost us big time in both legs
-
He slipped ffs but don't let that stop anyone blaming him....
-
ELF !
Some on here really don’t know how to answer an enquiry or question...
They react rather than engage and this probably says more about them than you!
So in answer to your enquiry...
I believe GM would have stuck with Marosi rather than letting Lawlor steal the day....Marosi for all his faults had weathered this journey to the play offs and deserves his place,..
however,
I do feel a bit safer with Lawlor between the sticks, but only a bit.....
Thank god it’s not my call...
And some posters can’t see when an OP is deliberately being controversial or on a wind up, or having a go unnecessarily at our players..
If your comment was aimed at me you are way off the mark - read my reply where I talk about the goalkeeper, I answered the OP and said why..
I then commented on the OP’s negativity - regardless that a forum is all about opinions - his are often overly negative and unjustified..
-
I've supported them longer than you. A lot longer. Marco is a good shot stopper no doubt about it. But he's made far too many errors and I'm sure Grant knows it. In my opinion IF we had got to Wembley Lawlor would have played. What is wrong with that suggestion
Longevity of “support” doesn’t make you more right, does it.?
Almost 44 years by the way..
And I answered your question about the keeper honestly..
I’m not stupid and neither are most of the forum readers..
Can I ask you, serious question, if you are such an avid DRFC supporter why are you overly negative about DRFC.??
-
I don't believe I am. In fact everything I say comes to fruition. I believe I was the first to call out Ferguson and was justified
-
Me. Me me me. Me me me me me me. Me.
Fixed that for you.
-
If we had got to Wembley, who do you think would have played in goal ?
Marosi..
He did nowt wrong tonight and he saved a penalty..
He slipped for their goal..
I for one am getting bored with your constant negativity..
You clearly don’t support DRFC so perhaps you should leave quietly, and don’t come back.?
Marko was at fault for their equaliser and for a goal in the first leg. He’s had a nightmare two games.
-
Great penalty save.
-
No he wasn’t at fault for the equaliser..
Even the Charlton oriented sky commentators said he slipped..
-
ELF !
Some on here really don’t know how to answer an enquiry or question...
They react rather than engage and this probably says more about them than you!
So in answer to your enquiry...
I believe GM would have stuck with Marosi rather than letting Lawlor steal the day....Marosi for all his faults had weathered this journey to the play offs and deserves his place,..
however,
I do feel a bit safer with Lawlor between the sticks, but only a bit.....
Thank god it’s not my call...
And some posters can’t see when an OP is deliberately being controversial or on a wind up, or having a go unnecessarily at our players..
If your comment was aimed at me you are way off the mark - read my reply where I talk about the goalkeeper, I answered the OP and said why..
I then commented on the OP’s negativity - regardless that a forum is all about opinions - his are often overly negative and unjustified..
My comments are rarely personal, more a blanket statement , however when I read a comment that is aimed at the author, I tend to attempt mediation,
I am well aware that ELF appears to wind up forum members with random negative (apparent) statements, but ...and there is always a but,
if the reader is not able to see through this and lobotomies the seemingly offensive statement with a rationalised counter argument, then they should not throw more paraffin on the topic ...
Sometimes silence is the better argument..
-
If silence is the better argument maybe the OP should follow that advice.!
One thing you will always get on a forum is a reaction to controversial posts.!
Over a period of time, you get an impression of the amount of negativity certain posters show..
-
If we had got to Wembley, who do you think would have played in goal ?
Marosi..
He did nowt wrong tonight and he saved a penalty..
He slipped for their goal..
I for one am getting bored with your constant negativity..
You clearly don’t support DRFC so perhaps you should leave quietly, and don’t come back.?
Marko was at fault for their equaliser and for a goal in the first leg. He’s had a nightmare two games.
I doubt that “ Fault” is the right word in this context...Marco clearly slips, and does get a hand to it...on another day that would have nullified a good cross and maybe fallen to one of our defenders to clear..( and we would be talking about that bit of brilliance for years)
But in this case I think the Charlton player was in the right place at the right time,
-
I have no problem with insightful, balanced criticism.
But when someone's first posts, after an experience like last night are mean, snidey criticisms, devoid of wit and charm and seemingly intent on winding folk up, I'm left genuinely feeling pity for them.
-
No he wasn’t at fault for the equaliser..
Even the Charlton oriented sky commentators said he slipped..
He did slip but it was through panic and that his feet were in a bad position. We can’t change anything now though can we. Forget about it and he will never play for us again.
-
I have no problem with insightful, balanced criticism.
But when someone's first posts, after an experience like last night are mean, snidey criticisms, devoid of wit and charm and seemingly intent on winding folk up, I'm left genuinely feeling pity for them.
It appears that that pity has spilled over into words of enmity
But more importantly.....can you actually answer the OPs question ?
-
Shaggy
I've no idea what you mean by your first sentence.
I've no interest in addressing your second sentence.
That apart, top post!
-
If silence is the better argument maybe the OP should follow that advice.!
One thing you will always get on a forum is a reaction to controversial posts.!
Over a period of time, you get an impression of the amount of negativity certain posters show..
You spoilt it again by personalising !
Controversy to one man is food for thought to another.....every negative statement needs debating and rationalising.....otherwise the negative becomes a fact....
Deep breath and answer this question;
IDM, Do you think GM would have stuck with Marosi in goal for the final against Sunderland , or preferred a fully fit Lawlor ?
-
Clearly this Esdaille chap is a wind up merchant but I’m staggered how people continue to defend Marosi. He’s really not a good keeper, and would be content should he leave in the summer. And yes he has cost us that tie, no doubt about it. The rest of the fellas deserved better.
-
Amazing how people remember the mistakes goalies make and never the brilliant saves they have made in season
A goalie makes a mistake it usually ends up in a goal a striker missing an open goal or a defender missing a tackle or a bad pass from a midfielder usually ending up with no effect on the game gets nowhere near the abuse a goalie gets and most of it undeserved as in case of Marosi last night
Not many have mentioned the deflection that caused Marosi to mess up on Sunday and to blame him for slipping at a vital moment last night is beyond belief
Marosi has saved us on more ocassions than he has let us down over the past few seasons and I for one will regret him leaving
-
Pathetic to blame Marko, he made some great saves and also kept us in the shoot-out with a tremendous save from Naby Sarr. Everyone can slip, Coppinger did it with the ball at his feet in the attacking third at one stage, did he have "bad footwork" as well?
He's always given it everything for the club, has Marosi, and just gets loads of stick when he's actually pretty good and far better than a succession of goalkeepers we've had in goal since Sullivan left.
-
Totally agree with this post , we need a keeper who doesn’t drop so many bollox and commands his box to take the pressure off the defence . To all those who can’t see this just take a minute to look back over the season and count how many times this guy has made mistakes at crucial times with not coming for a ball or coming for a ball in the box . You people who think he is bees knees are delusional, yes he is a shot stopper but Christ there is more to it than that
-
If silence is the better argument maybe the OP should follow that advice.!
One thing you will always get on a forum is a reaction to controversial posts.!
Over a period of time, you get an impression of the amount of negativity certain posters show..
You spoilt it again by personalising !
Controversy to one man is food for thought to another.....every negative statement needs debating and rationalising.....otherwise the negative becomes a fact....
Deep breath and answer this question;
IDM, Do you think GM would have stuck with Marosi in goal for the final against Sunderland , or preferred a fully fit Lawlor ?
Eh what.? You’re talking in riddles..
The OP is renowned for being overly negative, therefore yet another negative post after an outstanding team performance warrants response.. how can it not be “personal” if it is necessary to point out the ridiculous nature of a persons’s posts.?
As for the actual OP question, I answered it in my first response if you care to read it.!
-
I think McCann would have started with Marosi at Wembley.
Mainly for continuity and the fact that Lawlor isn’t match fit.
I have no doubt that Lawlor will be our number one next season and if anything I think Marosi has shown the last couple of months he isn’t good enough overall and has too many mistakes in him.
-
Wouldn't have even made the playoffs if it wasn't for Marosis form at the beginning of the season
-
Wouldn't have even made the playoffs if it wasn't for Marosis form at the beginning of the season
That’s up for debate. Lawlor is a very good goalkeeper in my book.
He did make saves to save us as does every keeper, but this last 12 games or so he has made more errors than any goalkeeper I can remember for us. He is a absolute liability when a ball is crossed into our box.
He’s a nice guy but if we are wanting to challenge again, he’s not good enough.
-
Problem is that both of them have a mistake in them nigh on every game. Looks like McCann has settled on Lawlor though so hope with age he can iron all this out.
-
I think McCann would have started with Marosi at Wembley.
Mainly for continuity and the fact that Lawlor isn’t match fit.
I have no doubt that Lawlor will be our number one next season and if anything I think Marosi has shown the last couple of months he isn’t good enough overall and has too many mistakes in him.
Cos Lawlor doesn't drop clangers about once a game either does he?
-
Wouldn’t have made the playoffs at all but for Marko & his performance in the first half, the game at Roots Hall - he also performed a job of sacrificing himself by getting sent off when we could’ve lost he got us a valuable point - I like Marko immensely & it’ll be a shame to see him move on
-
Well MM is off - not being offered another Contract so although we have debated this to death - and had Polls and supported "our" personal choices about is MM or IL the best Keeper .... the one opinion that counts has decided in favour of IL
-
Sorry Wolfie but GM said he was offered a new contract
-
Aye sorry .... that changes it a bit I suppose ... and proves nowt !
I just assumed which of course was "risky"