Just caught John ryan on the wireless

[ravenrover]

Can I just ask why people deem it necessary

[PDX_Rover]

In my post, I never said we had the right to say what JR should do with his shares. He is not the majority shareholder. I said any deal has to be in the best interests of DRFC, and obviously, the other owners don't feel that this Irish deal is.

As for the Belize billionaire... That could very well be a front, with an Irish or British concern simply having offshored their assets for tax purposes...

I don't Belize it for a moment.

[CraigyBoy]

Lets just get the cash in. Rovers are worth sod all so what's to worry about, the new owners aren't going to sell the stadium, sell the pitch, sell the players, sell our seats, or ruin the catering by eating all the food for nothing are they!? What's to lose? I'd like to see what rovers can be with some proper cash!! Get behind the bid.

[Glyn_Wigley]

Lets just get the cash in. Rovers are worth sod all so what's to worry about, the new owners aren't going to sell the stadium, sell the pitch, sell the players, sell our seats, or ruin the catering by eating all the food for nothing are they!? What's to lose? I'd like to see what rovers can be with some proper cash!! Get behind the bid.

Would you be just as happy to accept the bid if you found out Peter Ridsdale was behind it? Or Ken Richardson?

[River Don]

Lets just get the cash in. Rovers are worth sod all so what's to worry about, the new owners aren't going to sell the stadium, sell the pitch, sell the players, sell our seats, or ruin the catering by eating all the food for nothing are they!? What's to lose? I'd like to see what rovers can be with some proper cash!! Get behind the bid.

Would you be just as happy to accept the bid if you found out Peter Ridsdale was behind it? Or Ken Richardson?

He doesn't give a ... Damn.

We know from experience what the pitfalls are.

[silent majority]

I don't know how many times I have to say this, he's our latest wum. Don't give him the oxygen !

[DonnyRTID]

SM, you can't accuse someone as being a wum just cos he has a different view to you.

[RobTheRover]

Thats the flipside of history - we've all seen what happens to a club when people who dont care about it are in charge.  1997/8 still hurts for those who went through it.

[bigal]

Leave the  decision to the three people that matter its there money and
there choice all this speculation is no good at all. A little knowledge is a dangerous thing hence the threat of legal action. No matter  what  is written on here  will make any difference to the out come if anything it
will only make matters worse. If i was Jr i would have    resigned after reading
some of the threads on this forum

[DonnyRTID]

Amen!!!

[BobG]

"No matter  what  is written on here  will make any difference to the out come if anything it"

I suppose that means, Al, RTID, that you've never heard of what the supporters of Charlton Athletic achieved? Of Brighton? Of Bournemouth? Of AFC Wimbledon? Of the new Utd? They didn't achieve anything either did they?

Of course Al, your sentence is so badly written I could have misread its meaning.

BobG

[bigal]

"No matter  what  is written on here  will make any difference to the out come if anything it"

I suppose that means, Al, RTID, that you've never heard of what the supporters of Charlton Athletic achieved? Of Brighton? Of Bournemouth? Of AFC Wimbledon? Of the new Utd? They didn't achieve anything either did they?

Of course Al, your sentence is so badly written I could have misread its meaning.

BobG

Bob you are just a sh-t stirer have i spelt that right and will write anything to keep threads going that will do no good what so ever end of for me for this thread anyway

[BobG]

No mate. Stirrer has two 'r's in it. If I'm one of those, you are blind. Let's leave it at that eh?

Bob

[sf9944]

I'd use the word agitator.  That suit your sensibilities better Bob?

I'm not quite sure what you are trying to achieve but it is fairly clear to me that you have some sort of agenda in all this.  You have similarly 'agitated' when the club has found itself in difficulties before.  Unless I'm mistaken you got a lot of your suppositions wrong then.

You come on here every day throwing out your theories and suppositions based on very little.  Just embellishing your story a little more every day to wind people up a bit more.  Amazing how so many of these suppositions have ended becoming fact in the minds of many fans.  We don't know enough and I agree we should be careful.  But care is required in every aspect of this and I don't think you are showing enough of it.

I'm sure you'll respond saying that I and others are deluded.  However the above is what I think and I'm glad to get it off my chest.  I care more about my club than your sensibilities.

[steve@dcfd]

Its emotional blackmail using all teams that have failed, using all the owners with a bad reputation. We do not know who is behind the takeover and its the unknown that is upsetting people. Also JR is not telling the truth is certain people perception. He may distorted the facts in some cases it as been said. They would rather us be in league one than championship so we can all forget about the premiership. We will lose money any way all other clubs do.
The VSC should have their say its is a supporters trust,  but should they try and discredit any new owners before we all know the full facts. How many of the season ticket holders and pay on the day supporters are members of the VSC.
We are a football club with a good history which in the last 15 years as been run by a good chairman. We have been successful, why should he now want to undo that.

[Wellred]

 

[silent majority]

SM, you can't accuse someone as being a wum just cos he has a different view to you.

Yes I can, and I have done. It has nothing to do with his views, it's his intentions that are suspect.

[Wellred]

SM, you can't accuse someone as being a wum just cos he has a different view to you.

Yes I can, and I have done. It has nothing to do with his views, it's his intentions that are suspect.

Would you like to enlighten us on what his intentions are?

[silent majority]

SM, you can't accuse someone as being a wum just cos he has a different view to you.

Yes I can, and I have done. It has nothing to do with his views, it's his intentions that are suspect.

Would you like to enlighten us on what his intentions are?

He's a wum, ask him.

[Wellred]

SM, you can't accuse someone as being a wum just cos he has a different view to you.

Yes I can, and I have done. It has nothing to do with his views, it's his intentions that are suspect.

Would you like to enlighten us on what his intentions are?

He's a wum, ask him.

You have said his intentions are suspect. Why can you not answer the simple question?

[silent majority]

Wellred,

Try reading what I wrote not what you think I did. I said his intentions were suspect, and with most wums it's a simple case of winding up other readers. Why they do that is beyond me.