0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Apparently we've already been making enquiries...http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528,11699_6252056,00.htmlhttp://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/d/doncaster/8799297.stm it appears a loan move though, not permanent! Although surely we would look at how much they would want for him, like you say Jonathan with only a year left on contract and seemingly out of favour and lack of interest surely the fee wouldn't be extortianate??
Very interesting to read those opinions on him, it would appear his confidence has been shot to pieces in recent times at Wolves, and from a couple of ill considered loan spells.We've had the debate on how far SO'D can influence the game of a player to develop their potential. One thing I think is in little doubt is that he operates a management style and culture that encourages players to take on responsibility and have confidence in their own ability. I think Keogh is clearly in a position now where he needs a bit of encouragement and to be part of an environment where he will be trusted to make a positive contribution to the team.When you further consider that his best mate plays here, with whom he formed a lethal partnership which made a name for both of them in the game, then you can only imagine that he would have to seriously consider a move here on the right terms. I think it's obvious that our fans would welcome him. The comments from the Wolves fans come as a real surprise, I think many of our supporters can still recall the game in which he destroyed us for Scunthorpe and caused all sorts of problems, he'd start here on a high footing and get the kind of backing that it seems has been missing for the last few years.It all seems to make sense, all that remains is money I suppose. Keogh is still at an age whereby, similar to Sharp, if he could get back to playing the kind of football that he is clearly capable of, then his future transfer value would rocket and we would have another big asset on our hands. Given the increase to the budget from the Mills sell on clause, there are certainy worse ways of reinvesting the money than this. If the price was reasonable then it almost seems like a no brainer. With only a year left on his contract, surely Wolves wouldn't be asking too much now?
His management style certainly couldn't help develop the potential or confidence of a certain Mr Killgallon could it!!
Quote from: \"Wellred\" post=167006His management style certainly couldn't help develop the potential or confidence of a certain Mr Killgallon could it!!Pure assumption knowing nothing of Killgallons state of mind etc, but I think its the case that SOD can work with certain players and not with others. Some are borderline and I think he's fairly astute at not taking much of a risk on those so would only have them on loan.Keogh may well be less of a risk than Killgallon in SOD's mind and from what I read, would fit well into our system. Assuming Billy's fitness, it would be him and Hayter who'd be in competition and I think it offers a very good second option.He's enjoying a good wage at Wolves, so unlikely to be until the Jan window that he entertains a move to what on his present performance is likely to be a significant wage drop. Transfer fee somewhere in the region of £500k? Right now, I think a loan would be the most likely outcome.
We pussyfooted about last year to the extent that Mc Carthy publically stated ... you don't 'um and errr! you put in an offer that's how it works !!
Personally I don't think we should sign/loan Keogh. We already have a good championship goalscorer. I think for us to be better in attack is to sign a bigger target man. Like a Henderson/Mellor/Parkin/Brown type player. (as discussed). But yes I would take Keogh but id prefer to spend the money on a taller target man. Height is the way forward.
Quote from: \"Lewis Guys Dentist\" post=167075Personally I don't think we should sign/loan Keogh. We already have a good championship goalscorer. I think for us to be better in attack is to sign a bigger target man. Like a Henderson/Mellor/Parkin/Brown type player. (as discussed). But yes I would take Keogh but id prefer to spend the money on a taller target man. Height is the way forward.Vine?Why not have both? At a club where we can't really get goals without Billy, why would we turn down the chance (if it arose) to get in another proven goalscorer?
Quote from: \"RedJ\" post=167077Quote from: \"Lewis Guys Dentist\" post=167075Personally I don't think we should sign/loan Keogh. We already have a good championship goalscorer. I think for us to be better in attack is to sign a bigger target man. Like a Henderson/Mellor/Parkin/Brown type player. (as discussed). But yes I would take Keogh but id prefer to spend the money on a taller target man. Height is the way forward.Vine?Why not have both? At a club where we can't really get goals without Billy, why would we turn down the chance (if it arose) to get in another proven goalscorer?Cardiff.. Bristol.. Yes Im saying id take him. But I would prefer a target man. As for Vine you can't really judge him since he played 45 mins against that fantastic team at the other end of Donny. :dry: :dry:
Quote from: \"Lewis Guys Dentist\" post=167081Quote from: \"RedJ\" post=167077Quote from: \"Lewis Guys Dentist\" post=167075Personally I don't think we should sign/loan Keogh. We already have a good championship goalscorer. I think for us to be better in attack is to sign a bigger target man. Like a Henderson/Mellor/Parkin/Brown type player. (as discussed). But yes I would take Keogh but id prefer to spend the money on a taller target man. Height is the way forward.Vine?Why not have both? At a club where we can't really get goals without Billy, why would we turn down the chance (if it arose) to get in another proven goalscorer?Cardiff.. Bristol.. Yes Im saying id take him. But I would prefer a target man. As for Vine you can't really judge him since he played 45 mins against that fantastic team at the other end of Donny. :dry: :dry:Vine - hasn't he gone for millions before? I think he'd cut it to be honest..
Quote from: \"RedJ\" post=167102Quote from: \"Lewis Guys Dentist\" post=167081Quote from: \"RedJ\" post=167077Quote from: \"Lewis Guys Dentist\" post=167075Personally I don't think we should sign/loan Keogh. We already have a good championship goalscorer. I think for us to be better in attack is to sign a bigger target man. Like a Henderson/Mellor/Parkin/Brown type player. (as discussed). But yes I would take Keogh but id prefer to spend the money on a taller target man. Height is the way forward.Vine?Why not have both? At a club where we can't really get goals without Billy, why would we turn down the chance (if it arose) to get in another proven goalscorer?Cardiff.. Bristol.. Yes Im saying id take him. But I would prefer a target man. As for Vine you can't really judge him since he played 45 mins against that fantastic team at the other end of Donny. :dry: :dry:Vine - hasn't he gone for millions before? I think he'd cut it to be honest..Yeah he has but does that instantly make him a good player? I don't think so.Still wouldn't mind him