0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Just incase any was interested, purchased the other day legally.
David Blunt? He is a director so it couldn't have been him without being disclosed
Quote from: \"Jenny\" post=222793David Blunt? He is a director so it couldn't have been him without being disclosedWhen was Blunt appointed? Would that make any difference to the need for disclosure? (ie was he appointed after he made the loan?)Actually, I can't see Blunt's appointment on Companies House - ???
Quote from: \"Muttley\" post=222852Quote from: \"Jenny\" post=222793David Blunt? He is a director so it couldn't have been him without being disclosedWhen was Blunt appointed? Would that make any difference to the need for disclosure? (ie was he appointed after he made the loan?)Actually, I can't see Blunt's appointment on Companies House - ???He's listed as a director in the latest stats - appointed 24 November 2010. Would have thought that even if he wasn't a director when he loaned the money (if he loaned the money) then it would have to be disclosed given he became a director in the period. I will double check the rules with someone who will know...!David Blunt does hold a significant amount of shares as at 31/3/2011
Didn't some bod from Keepmoat (CEO?) bung some money in to fund the Kilgallon deal? That can't have been cheap.