I can't be arsed....

[BobG]

More than 1 in 2 threads in this part of the forum are started by that total wazzock Mick. Just why is that do you suppose? The answer is pretty obvious.

The inability of the total wazzock to look a fact in the face and accept it for what it is is evidence par excellence of what he is.

The total wazzock does this for kicks. I wonder what's missing from his lfe that he has to sink to this level?

I doubt, quite a lot, I shall visit this part of the forum again. What's the point?

Cheers

BobG

[jucyberry]

Noo Bob, don't say that, Just do what i am doing and follow my new years resolution..(see thread below for details).. don't leave..      

[Glyn_Wigley]

Oh, I don't know. There's a certain amusement factor in seeing what the latest twisted logic inanity will be. He's like a living version of 'Defend The Indefensible' on Fighting Talk.

I sort of think of him like a pet.

[jucyberry]

If I had a pet like that I'd take it to the vet to be treated for distemper..

[redwine]

What you to remember is that his family no longer talk to him.

Now that Cameron, Clegg and Osbourne have taken out the restraining order against him him this is the only place left for him.

I prefer to think of it as care in the community.

[RedJ]

If I had a pet like that I'd take it to the vet to be treated for distemper..

I'd take it to the vet but not for that..

[wilts rover]

Oh you know you will Bob, its like that car crash on the opposite side of the road when you know you shouldn't look......but just can't help yourself. The thing is with Mick that it is a wind up - but he does also seem to believe it. And not only him. You must work with people with the same views and opinions, I know I do, so it does help to see how the other half live and think, even if you dont believe it. A bit like care in the community, it does the soul good to help the afflicted every now and then.

Might be up your way tomorrow for a spin up to the water park and back. Then again if the weather forecast is right I might be staying in bed.

[big fat yorkshire pudding]

He's a wind up but half the time he says the truth....

[Dagenham Rover]

More than 1 in 2 threads in this part of the forum are started by that total wazzock Mick. Just why is that do you suppose? The answer is pretty obvious.

The inability of the total wazzock to look a fact in the face and accept it for what it is is evidence par excellence of what he is.

The total wazzock does this for kicks. I wonder what's missing from his lfe that he has to sink to this level?

I doubt, quite a lot, I shall visit this part of the forum again. What's the point?

Cheers

BobG

You keep coming back to this part,. Bob look at it the opposite way how often does he start a thread  in the Rovers based Viking Chat, Rovers supporter or........................

[mushRTID]

Wazzock, brilliant word. Not used enough.

[redwine]

I know what you mean, reminds me somuch of Tony Capstick and his "you great parrot faced wazzock"

[redwine]

Hi Mick (waving furiously)

[mjdgreg]

More than 1 in 2 threads in this part of the forum are started by that total wazzock mjdgreg. Just why is that do you suppose? The answer is pretty obvious.

The answer is because he has a lot of interesting, intelligent things to say. He has also taken it upon himself to expose the vacuous leftie thinking that is prevalent on this forum.

I'm glad I didn't learn maths at your school. I've just done a quick calculation and of the 27 threads (non-sticky) on this page, I have started 7 out of 27. So if you divide 7 by 27 you get 0.25925925925 recurring. For those of you that are crap at maths this equates to a percentage of 25.93% (rounded up). This means that I have started just over 25% of threads and not over 50% as you are claiming (using just this page as an example where I have been 'prolific'. If you looked at the rest of the forum then the percentage falls well below 25.93%).

Talk about exaggerating. I disagree with you 1 million per cent. Just be grateful that it isn't BST starting up all these threads. You would definitely have something to complain about then.

[wilts rover]

I am glad I am not your optician. Bob didn't say page - he said this part of the forum, of which there are I believe 71 pages. Which immediately makes your statistical analysis incorrect as the figures you are using are unreliable, or to shorten the sentence - lies. Which is your typical right wing ploy of finding the 'facts' to suit your argument, rather than arguing over the facts.

[mjdgreg]

I am glad I am not your optician. Bob didn't say page - he said this part of the forum, of which there are I believe 71 pages. Which immediately makes your statistical analysis incorrect as the figures you are using are unreliable, or to shorten the sentence - lies. Which is your typical right wing ploy of finding the 'facts' to suit your argument, rather than arguing over the facts.

I will guarantee you that I have started much less than 25.9% of all threads on the 71 pages you refer to. I did Bob a favour by only using the most recent page so as not to make him look totally ridiculous. As an example on page 2 of this forum I only started less than 7% of all threads.

In fact overall, I bet I start less than 10% of all threads. You really do try to defend the indefensible. Typical leftie. Get a grip man. All you've done is make yourself and Bob look daft.

I await your abject apology which will be accepted gracelessly, immediately.

[wilts rover]

My dear chap, I took issue with your reply to Bob as it was inaccurate and therefore the figures you quoted within it were inaccurate. You note I have taken neither one side nor the other on what the percentage of threads you have started, as frankly I have no interest in it. My concern is accuracy. You were inaccurate and therefore to use common parlance, lied. I shall of course accept any apology you care to make and would prefer it to be to Bob and the whole forum rather than just myself.

[mjdgreg]

If your concern is accuracy, then why don't you take Bob to task over his totally exaggerated stats? Is it because you see him as a leftie friend who must be defended at all costs? Typical leftie. No logic whatsoever to your argument.

[glosterred]

And here we go again!

[River Don]

Let's have a heated debate!

[Nudga]

What i'd like to know is why does Mick, mjdsmeg always comment on the political stuff and never Rovers related stuff? And I know we have an off topic section but the political threads are getting a bit much now surely.

[mjdgreg]

Cos all my rovers threads get locked for no good reason.

[BillyStubbsTears]

Nudga

He did comment on Rovers related stuff. It was confined to giving us his considered opinion on why Saunders was useless and how there was no way that we could be competitive in this division because we didn't have enough possession. Or was it shots? Or was it shots per percentage of possession? I forget now.

Whichever one it was, it was infantile bullshit. So he doesn't comment on that any more. And since he never goes to matches, he has nothing else to offer on opinions about the Rovers.

So instead, he contents himself by copying and pasting rants from swivel-eyed butters that would embarrass the Tea Party. And then he claims victory in any ensuing discussion like a mad Scooby-Doo villain.

Fascinating personality.

[Filo]

He`s lost his ability to comment on a thread he started as well

http://www.drfc-vsc.co.uk/index.php?topic=237124.0


I wonder why?

[wilts rover]

If your concern is accuracy, then why don't you take Bob to task over his totally exaggerated stats? Is it because you see him as a leftie friend who must be defended at all costs? Typical leftie. No logic whatsoever to your argument.

Because my argument is with the inaccuracy of your statistics and weak arguments you use to support them - Sir, I do not like your tweed.....

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0iRTB-FTMdk" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0iRTB-FTMdk</a>

[MachoMadness]

I'd recommend you use the ignore user list, Bob. Having said that, it doesn't actually hide Mick's asinine threads, or any of the replies to him, so it's not as effective as it could be.

I don't understand what Mick gets out of this. Sometimes I think he's just a troll, but then he takes the time to type out paragraphs of text (or usually just ganks them straight off Google, but whatever) and he's kept it up for about 18 months. That's a long time to antagonise a bunch of strangers on a messageboard. His schtick is entirely making a prick out of himself, and then chortling away to himself when everyone calls him a prick because he's only pretending. Or is he? Either way Mick, it's a long, long time to keep this up don't you think?

Either way, Mick is a very insecure soul. There's no gold, no property business, I doubt if there's even the betterware round. Classic overcompensating. Notice how he never says what his businesses actually are or what they do? He's found an article on Google about how to prosper in a recession and is tossing off over it furiously, although without getting into too much detail because, of course, he doesn't actually know what he's talking about. Do what I do and make use of the ignore user function - but remember, the ignore user function is useless if other people keep responding to him anyway.

[mjdgreg]

I'll have you know that there is a property empire. There is a lot of money invested in gold. There is a very profitable gambling business. There is a very successful teaching business. All these businesses are run by just me.

You are right about there not being a Betterware round though. That was such an obvious joke that I'm very surprised you missed it (but then again thinking about it you seem to make your mind up about most things without using any sound reasoning). Surely it would be obvious that a man with my business acumen would not need to resort to Betterware? That said I would not decry anyone that has one of these rounds. At least you've taken the first step to starting your own businesses.

I'll also have you know that I firmly believe everything I post. You obviously don't take on board any of my points because you are such a closed minded leftie that your brain can only compute leftie drivel.

[redwine]

There is a very profitable gambling business.

You are James Coppinger and I claim my £5

[Dagenham Rover]

There is a very profitable gambling business.

You are James Coppinger and I claim my £5

 

[BobG]

You're right Wilts. I have popped by. But only to see the tone of this thread. I see the pilchard has taken refuge in detail again. Like nationalism, it's the last refuge of the scoundrel. Completely gives away the fact that neither he, nor they, have any appreciation of the bigger picture. The man is a fool.

BobG

[keyser_soze]

The total wazzock does this for kicks.

Oh the irony of getting your knickers in a twist therefore giving him the kicks he is looking for.