Flynn's too soft

[Belle-Vue-Ghost]

  Almost crying at my desk here - what a thread 

[mjdgreg]

Phew!

mjdgreg making stuff up? Never in the memory of man.

What's the date? Somebody write it down.

Your abject apology will also be accepted immediately.

[mjdgreg]

The Date 1066

Your abject apology will also be accepted immediately.

[Filo]

mjdgreg

I've been searching the deleted threads file (we keep a copy obviously) but there isn't a single thread of yours in there about stats and possession with reference to Brian Flynn. Let me repeat that, not a single one!! If you must spread absolute tripe at least try and not get found out at the first hurdle. Amateur!

Wrong. The tread was titled 'Key Stats From Yesterday'. I suggest you speak to Mr Wigley. I suspect he removed it. When I mentioned the fact that I had started a thread about stats he posted the following:

But what have been his possession stats?

I did post some stats but the thread got removed almost immediately.

And it mentioned nothing about possession.

I've highlighted Mr Wigley's comments in bold. So as you can see he is fully aware of the so called fictitious thread. He is correct that I didn't mention anything about possession but then again I never claimed to have done.

I suggest in future that maybe a discussion between the moderators needs to be held before the draconian act of removing a thread for no good reason is taken. I always thought this forum was very tolerant of people's views ( even though you have locked a good number of my threads) but am now starting to feel that onerous censorship is starting to become the order of the day.

I await your an abject apology that will be accepted immediately so we can put this sorry matter behind us.   

The tread was titled 'Key Stats From Yesterday'. I suggest you speak to Mr Wigley. I suspect he removed it.

Wrong, again, I`m sure Mr Wigley will accept your abject apology, he was n`t even online when I removed it, and for the record I removed it because I`m sick to the back teeth of your intentional wind up posts, as I`m sure many others are on this forum, you`re taking the piss and you know it, you`ve had more slack than most on here, be grateful for that, you`ve ruined Off Topic, I`ll be damned if you`re going to ruin the main forum as well!

That`s my opinion, I have n`t consulted with any other Mod, they may have different views, I don`t know, but as far as I`m concerned being a WUM on the main forum puts you on thin ice!

[wilts rover]

mjdgreg

I've been searching the deleted threads file (we keep a copy obviously) but there isn't a single thread of yours in there about stats and possession with reference to Brian Flynn. Let me repeat that, not a single one!! If you must spread absolute tripe at least try and not get found out at the first hurdle. Amateur!

Wrong. The tread was titled 'Key Stats From Yesterday'. I suggest you speak to Mr Wigley. I suspect he removed it. When I mentioned the fact that I had started a thread about stats he posted the following:

But what have been his possession stats?

I did post some stats but the thread got removed almost immediately.

And it mentioned nothing about possession.

I've highlighted Mr Wigley's comments in bold. So as you can see he is fully aware of the so called fictitious thread. He is correct that I didn't mention anything about possession but then again I never claimed to have done.

I suggest in future that maybe a discussion between the moderators needs to be held before the draconian act of removing a thread for no good reason is taken. I always thought this forum was very tolerant of people's views ( even though you have locked a good number of my threads) but am now starting to feel that onerous censorship is starting to become the order of the day.

I await your an abject apology that will be accepted immediately so we can put this sorry matter behind us.   

A thread about 'Key Stats' that didn't mention possession, oh really? Did your three stopwatches break or was there another reason (other than we had 65% possession and lost) for why you didn't include it oh great oracle?