0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Or he could have been chosen because he's one of the most experienced and decorated players we've ever produced.
Quote from: GazLaz on October 21, 2013, 11:50:06 amOr he could have been chosen because he's one of the most experienced and decorated players we've ever produced. His qualifications as player dont come into in my book.its his CV as a person that i question .One classic from him. Was When utd were away at fulham on new years day and the prick tweeted ....hope all you lot are out tonight enjoying a new years eve drink/party while i have too sit in my hotel room ....He soon took his tweet down after untold normall People tweeted back that They be more Than happy to be hotel bound on new years eve while picking up thousands upon thousand Of pounds a week pay packet.The bloke as no moral compass for me and there must be far better standing Black players out there who could do the role Or is that why he got the job because he is Black?to keep all the left Wing And politital correct fcukwits happy and that society Of Black lawyers book ends
The only reason he's in is because some split arse piped up and said that she didn't think this new commitee b*llocks was diverse enough!
Quote from: SoundbiteBarmyArmy on October 21, 2013, 10:12:46 amThe only reason he's in is because some split arse piped up and said that she didn't think this new commitee b*llocks was diverse enough!Yeah, its clear from this post that diversity isn't an issue among football and football fans at all.
I think Clarke Carlisle would be a good choice as he's intelligent and well spoken, however isn't he already linked with something else? Perhaps they considered him but with him having something else on the go thought otherwise.
Quote from: Monkcaster_Rover on October 21, 2013, 01:42:05 pmI think Clarke Carlisle would be a good choice as he's intelligent and well spoken, however isn't he already linked with something else? Perhaps they considered him but with him having something else on the go thought otherwise. Greg Dyke invited the PFA to send a representative and at the time Clarke Carlisle was Chairman. He's now retired and so has relinquished the chair- the PFA Chairman is always an active player. I still think Carlisle would be a good choice in his own right. Also I heard Ledley King on the radio the other day and was impressed by what he had to say. Both would be better than Ferdinand, whose appointment reeks of tokenism.
Dion Dublin spoke a fair bit of sense yesterday
Just watch the highlights of their game vs WBA at Old Trafford the other week, and look who is questionablly at fault for both WBA goals!
Quote from: SoundbiteBarmyArmy on October 21, 2013, 12:25:55 pmJust watch the highlights of their game vs WBA at Old Trafford the other week, and look who is questionablly at fault for both WBA goals!What a pointless point to make he's not on the panel because of his footballing performances this season what's him making two mistakes got to do with it. He's been one of the best centre halves England have had and a few years ago he was one of the best centre halves in the world and he's won everything at club level. He's there to try and improve the state of English football at the bottom and the bloke has great experience in the game and talks sense when it comes to football.