Author Topic: Robbed? (Read 4070 times)

Bentley Bullet · « on December 10, 2014, 06:11:56 pm by Bentley Bullet »

Make your own mind up...
http://youtu.be/eeDAjkYQnqE

« **on:** December 10, 2014, 06:11:56 pm »

(want to hide these ads? Join the VSC today!)

tommy toes · « **Reply #1 on** December 10, 2014, 06:15:51 pm by tommy toes »

Can see why they gave it. Robbo jumps over't ball right in front oft keeper.

Wellred · « **Reply #2 on** December 10, 2014, 06:18:41 pm by Wellred »

In 99 other games that would be a goal.
Totally ridiculous law. Nobody knows from one game to the next what is and what isn't offside.
It shouldn't be down to what a linesman decides.

donnievic · « **Reply #3 on** December 10, 2014, 06:25:39 pm by donnievic »

To me it should be offside everytime because let's be right he is interfering with play however now a days they linesman only ever seem to put their flags up if it touches the player

Filo · « **Reply #4 on** December 10, 2014, 06:34:35 pm by Filo »

Robinson is offside, he's interferring with play by blocking the keepers sight, hate to say it, but the lino got it right, the t**t!

mushRTID · « **Reply #5 on** December 10, 2014, 06:40:22 pm by mushRTID »

Correct decision.

Wellred · « **Reply #6 on** December 10, 2014, 06:43:11 pm by Wellred »

Don't disagree but how many times do you see the exact same thing in other games and the goal is given?
That is what is wrong with this stupid off side rule.

Glyn_Wigley · « **Reply #7 on** December 10, 2014, 06:56:10 pm by Glyn_Wigley »

Like the great Bill Shankly used to say, if he isn't interfering with play he shouldn't be on the bloody pitch!

mrfrostsdad · « **Reply #8 on** December 10, 2014, 07:03:13 pm by mrfrostsdad »

Having just seen it on Look North he's definitely offside for me.
Runs straight across the keeper so must distract him or block his view, and probably both.
Good decision unfortunately

1879Rovers · « **Reply #9 on** December 10, 2014, 07:09:11 pm by 1879Rovers »

Offside. Personally, I think it would be easier to do away with the offside rule. Active/inactive?

graingrover · « **Reply #10 on** December 10, 2014, 08:28:40 pm by graingrover »

a great shot from Benno!

IDM · « **Reply #11 on** December 10, 2014, 09:01:15 pm by IDM »

Assuming Theo is in an offside position when Kyle shoots, then this is correct, he's interfering.

You'd be pissed off if it was the opposition and a goal given.

Dagenham Rover · « **Reply #12 on** December 10, 2014, 09:06:39 pm by Dagenham Rover »

the only person that complained was Carrol ........... nobody else from either team, and the lino eventually decided after being moaned at by an ex England superstar

the ref ws in a good position and has its been previously said 99 games out of a hundred its a goal, exception being at Donny

Bentley Bullet · « *Last Edit: December 10, 2014, 10:12:39 pm by Bentley Bullet* »

It seems to me that the linesman thought a Rovers player was offside, but wasn't interfering with play so kept his flag down. The referee saw that a Rovers player was obstructing the keepers view, but was unaware that the player was offside.

Therefore the goal was given, but was then rescinded because the Notts keeper Carroll objected to the linesman, who then raised his flag.

To summarise, the referee and the linesman initially made their judgement on what they each individually saw, and then changed their minds when they corroborated their accounts of the incident, after intimidation from the Notts keeper!

So basically if my theory's right, neither of the officials saw anything wrong with the goal!

Dagenham Rover · « **Reply #14 on** December 10, 2014, 10:09:32 pm by Dagenham Rover »

That's exactly my take on it

southwestexile · « **Reply #15 on** December 10, 2014, 10:35:47 pm by southwestexile »

How much was the big screen a factor in the decision?

donnievic · « **Reply #16 on** December 11, 2014, 03:30:59 pm by donnievic »

Non they didn't look at the big screen

Dagenham Rover · « **Reply #17 on** December 11, 2014, 04:35:10 pm by Dagenham Rover »

Quote from: donnievic on December 11, 2014, 03:30:59 pm

Non they didn't look at the big screen

They made sure they didn't look at it

Rosso Exile Deux · « **Reply #18 on** December 11, 2014, 04:41:29 pm by Rosso Exile Deux »

Quote from: Dagenham Rover on December 10, 2014, 09:06:39 pm

.... after being moaned at by an ex England superstar ....

ermmm... .ex N.Ireland superstar....

Dagenham Rover · « **Reply #19 on** December 11, 2014, 05:10:40 pm by Dagenham Rover »

Quote from: Rosso Exile Deux on December 11, 2014, 04:41:29 pm

Quote from: Dagenham Rover on December 10, 2014, 09:06:39 pm
.... after being moaned at by an ex England superstar ....

ermmm... .ex N.Ireland superstar....

yer know what I mean

the vicar · « **Reply #20 on** December 11, 2014, 09:50:03 pm by the vicar »

according to the tv it was not cos of Robbo it was for off side by Main what a load of boliocks

Askern_reds · « **Reply #21 on** December 11, 2014, 10:04:20 pm by Askern_reds »

Does it mater . It all Evans itself out over a season, weel get some decisions that shouldn't av got and won't what we we should have,but to be honest I'm glad we're out of the stupid cup

idler · « **Reply #22 on** December 11, 2014, 10:08:43 pm by idler »

I was listening on player at the time. According to the commentary the linesman and ref were still consulting when the replay was shown. They then said that it looked like Robinson obscured Carroll's view.
A few seconds later the goal was disallowed.

Filo · « **Reply #23 on** December 11, 2014, 11:18:04 pm by Filo »

Regardless of wether the officials looked at the screen or not, reply's shouldn't be shown until a final decision has been made

IDM · « **Reply #24 on** December 11, 2014, 11:31:07 pm by IDM »

I didn't think replays of any contentious decision were allowed?

Either way, rightly or wrongly, I think unfortunately for us that offside was the correct decision.

idler · « **Reply #25 on** December 12, 2014, 06:20:46 am by idler »

It maybe didn't seem contentious when they showed it though.
Leeds used to have a former top level referee deciding what should and shouldn't be replayed.

donnievic · « **Reply #26 on** December 12, 2014, 07:59:13 am by donnievic »

It was shown as they were about to talk to each other so guess it took that long the goal was already about to be shown,then wellens went over pointing to the screen but by then it had already been played anyway

Links

Shortcuts

Author Topic: Robbed? (Read 4070 times)