Author Topic: Plymouth steward (Read 3718 times)

MrFrost · « on December 12, 2016, 06:34:41 pm by MrFrost »

Sacked following his comments on Facebook.

« **on:** December 12, 2016, 06:34:41 pm »

(want to hide these ads? Join the VSC today!)

Copps is Magic · « **Reply #1 on** December 12, 2016, 06:38:06 pm by Copps is Magic »

Good riddance.

RedJ · « **Reply #2 on** December 12, 2016, 06:51:06 pm by RedJ »

Hahaha the f**king bellend.

The Red Baron · « **Reply #3 on** December 12, 2016, 07:07:00 pm by The Red Baron »

Where did you see this please and what did he say?

glosterred · « **Reply #4 on** December 12, 2016, 07:10:59 pm by glosterred »

So what was his comment?

COYR

eastender · « **Reply #5 on** December 12, 2016, 07:31:23 pm by eastender »

Quote from: The Red Baron on December 12, 2016, 07:07:00 pm

Where did you see this please and what did he say?

He posted this on FaceBook

"I will just leave this here for all you bitter Doncaster fans.
Remember to always wear your seat belts.
League 2 best goal keeper
Super Luke McCormick"

Copps is Magic · « **Reply #6 on** December 12, 2016, 07:35:09 pm by Copps is Magic »

A handful of Plymouth fans have made similar comments. A few detectives on the facebook group worked out this particular gimp was employed as steward at plymouth through a third party security company. After a number of emails to pafc and the security company he's lost his job.

German Rover · « **Reply #7 on** December 12, 2016, 07:38:57 pm by German Rover »

I have no sympathy, you must always think before you post on social media, what you find funny and acceptable may be completely different to what your employers do.

Copps is Magic · « **Reply #8 on** December 12, 2016, 07:43:40 pm by Copps is Magic »

In general, yes. In this particular instance I can't see how anyone could construe what he wrote as in any way funny.

German Rover · « **Reply #9 on** December 12, 2016, 07:56:14 pm by German Rover »

Quote from: Copps is Magic on December 12, 2016, 07:43:40 pm

In general, yes. In this particular instance I can't see how anyone could construe what he wrote as in any way funny.

He did

PDX_Rover · « **Reply #10 on** December 12, 2016, 10:01:29 pm by PDX_Rover »

Let's face it. Anyone ending their name in an 'i' where there should be a 'y' is wither a kitson or in the American porn industry. And if Andi is a bloke... He deserves sacking anyway.

wilts rover · « **Reply #11 on** December 12, 2016, 10:13:01 pm by wilts rover »

Bloke writes a load of b*****xs on Facebook shocker, , so no sympathy there, well done for reporting him and getting him sacked you sensible chaps, and for reminding me why I dont use it.

You are showing a touch too much knowledge of the American porn industry there if I may say so PDX...

idler · « **Reply #12 on** December 12, 2016, 10:19:24 pm by idler »

Ironic that the person causing all this bother escapes scot free.
I wonder what the directors of Plymouth think or do the three points outweigh everything else?
These points were being won anyway so why didn't McCormick just get on with it?

bobjimwilly · « **Reply #13 on** December 12, 2016, 10:28:34 pm by bobjimwilly »

Was the right decision by his employer in this instance. And I agree people should also consider what they write on social media in the public domain.

Bentley Bullet · « **Reply #14 on** December 12, 2016, 10:40:27 pm by Bentley Bullet »

It wasn't McCormick's fault that he got off scot-free, it was the officials. With that in mind it can be said it's them who have caused all the bother.

And they will get off scot-free.

idler · « **Reply #15 on** December 12, 2016, 10:43:46 pm by idler »

That was my point BB. he caused it all and just walks off.
How can the ref not deem some action towards him unnecessary?

Bentley Bullet · « **Reply #16 on** December 12, 2016, 11:02:07 pm by Bentley Bullet »

I don't think the officials did McCormick any favours in the long run. If they had done their job properly and booked him in the first place, the second incident might not have happened. Then McCormick's fragile character might have escaped so much media disproval.

roversdude · « **Reply #17 on** December 13, 2016, 04:58:43 am by roversdude »

Aren't the FA allowed to step in a retrospectively impose punishment if ref fails to act ... for keeper not steward

idler · « **Reply #18 on** December 13, 2016, 07:03:56 am by idler »

Anyone with any sense that had had as much media scrutiny as McCormick would keep their heads down.
A yellow card for him after the penalty would have been not only appropriate but calm both players and fans.
We are probably too far down the chain for the FA to bother with any retrospective action.

Glyn_Wigley · « **Reply #19 on** December 13, 2016, 08:36:23 am by Glyn_Wigley »

Quote from: roversdude on December 13, 2016, 04:58:43 am

Aren't the FA allowed to step in a retrospectively impose punishment if ref fails to act ... for keeper not steward

But the ref did act. It has to be something he missed altogether for any retrospective intervention.

Bentley Bullet · « **Reply #20 on** December 13, 2016, 08:59:07 am by Bentley Bullet »

.....Or ignored. Either way, he wasn't doing his job properly.

idler · « **Reply #21 on** December 13, 2016, 11:05:52 am by idler »

Quote from: Glyn_Wigley on December 13, 2016, 08:36:23 am

Quote from: roversdude on December 13, 2016, 04:58:43 am
Aren't the FA allowed to step in a retrospectively impose punishment if ref fails to act ... for keeper not steward

But the ref did act. It has to be something he missed altogether for any retrospective intervention.

The keeper left is line and stood threateningly over a lad on his knees.
He was also shouting at him. If this isn't ungentlemanly conduct/aggressive behaviour what is.
If only he had taken his shirt off, that would have been a definite yellow. I wonder if more would have been made of it if had been a televised game?

RTID!!! · « **Reply #22 on** December 13, 2016, 06:42:19 pm by RTID!!! »

what an idiot

Links

Shortcuts

Author Topic: Plymouth steward (Read 3718 times)