0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Silent Iv thrown the paper work away but they took my name and address etc and gave me a disorder clearence out of town
Failure to comply with the direction to leave is a criminal offence. Failure to surrender items is also a criminal offence.The Court of Appeal in Carter v CPS [2009] EWHC 2197 (Admin) considered the conduct of proceedings involving the breach of directions given under a dispersal order. The effect of the judgment is that all relevant documents should be made available to the court at the first hearing to enable it to ascertain whether the authorisation was admitted by the defence. At the first hearing, the court will ask whether or not the validity of the authorisation is admitted. If it is not admitted, the case should be put back for a short time on the same day to enable the defendant to consider the relevant documents. If the defence seeks to challenge the authorisation, the question will arise whether the validity of the authorisation is a matter to be determined by the magistrates or by challenge to the High Court. The Divisional Court in Carter v CPS [2009] EWHC 2197 (Admin) did not give guidance on the factors to consider in making this determination.The Crown must prove all elements of the offence:The authorisation was in effect and was validThe officer was in uniformThe direction was given inside the relevant localityThe defendant knew that he was being given a direction under the authorisationThe direction given was lawfulThe defendant failed to comply with the direction.It is essential that a copy of the authorisation and the written notice are submitted to the CPS as part of the initial file provided by the police. The CPS must have these documents in order to prove the validity as an element of the offence.In order to prove that the officer acted lawfully, the validity of the authorisation must be proved. It is suggested that the officer of the rank of inspector or above who gave the authorisation makes a s9 Criminal Justice Act 1967 (CJA) statement at the time he signs the authorisation confirming that he made it, setting out the brief grounds for his decisions and exhibiting the authorisation. A copy of this statement can be used in all subsequent prosecutions. A police officer seeking to give a direction pursuant to the authorisation and written notice should ensure that the terms of the direction are clear, for example, when the person must leave the area and the manner in which the person must do so (including the route).The word 'disperse' is not defined in the Act. The dictionary definition is 'to scatter, to go or drive or send in different directions'. It is submitted that when an officer tells a group to disperse, this means they should all leave the area.SentencingA person given a direction under s35 who fails without reasonable excuse to comply with it commits an offence and is liable on summary conviction -(a) To imprisonment for a period not exceeding 3 months, or(b) To a fine not exceeding level 4 on the standard scale.A person given a direction under s37 who fails without reasonable excuse to comply with it commits an offence. A person guilty of an offence under s37(3) is liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding level 2 on the standard scale.
QuoteThe Anti-Social Behaviour Act 2003 gives the police powers in designated areas to disperse groups of two or more where their presence or behaviour has resulted, or is likely to result, in a member of the public being harassed, intimidated, alarmed or distressed. The powers are controversial due to the discretion they accord to police and the infringements of individual's rights they entail.In theory, then, if they 'disperse' they can go back to the game - bus/train/car.
The Anti-Social Behaviour Act 2003 gives the police powers in designated areas to disperse groups of two or more where their presence or behaviour has resulted, or is likely to result, in a member of the public being harassed, intimidated, alarmed or distressed. The powers are controversial due to the discretion they accord to police and the infringements of individual's rights they entail.
Quote from: Padge_DRFC on February 24, 2018, 12:14:26 pm5% of the away end empty. Stand where you wanna.Not selfish are you Padge. Does’nt matter a jot about anyone else. What a considerate person yo are.NOT.
5% of the away end empty. Stand where you wanna.
I'm with Martin now.If anyone has the dispersal order notice please keep hold of it. We will put up more info later today. The notices have to be individually served upon you and have a reason why they have been served. It is not acceptable to issue "block" dispersal notices.To answer the question regarding whether you can refuse to sign one, the answer is no you can't. You have to comply and then deal with it later through a different process.
Going off the facebook group it seems a good percentage of those dispersed have been successful in selling their tickets.
I’d love to hear the reason why Rotherham fans can casually go to donny market areas with no escort or problem but donny youth mob yes I agree 70 plus is stopped straight away and sent back? Donny police are a bunch of fkg jobsworths and are shite at there job.
Disgraceful policing today. All the focus was on the Donny fans with Rotherham fans left to do largely as they like. Why on earth were all the police on the lower level leaving the ground looking for Donny fans to breathe out of turn while the Rotherham fans above us were not policed and free to hurl abuse and spit at us.