Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 23, 2024, 08:26:01 am

Login with username, password and session length

Links


FSA logo

Author Topic: Liverpool v City  (Read 9256 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Alan Southstand

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 7166
Re: Liverpool v City
« Reply #30 on April 10, 2018, 07:03:46 am by Alan Southstand »
Back to the Young challenge and replay - did he not win the ball first and the momentum carried him through to Aguero's leg. I thought it was a typical Rob Jones challenge with no intent other than to win the ball. Kompany has got away with plenty of those in his time, so what goes around......

City will surely still win the league, but who cares? The amount of money on the pitch in that game was nothing short of scandalous and a perfect example of what is going wrong with football.



(want to hide these ads? Join the VSC today!)

drfchound

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 29443
Re: Liverpool v City
« Reply #31 on April 10, 2018, 07:30:26 am by drfchound »
Young had both feet off the ground as he went into the challenge.
Dangerous and possibly out of control.

GazLaz

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 12657
Re: Liverpool v City
« Reply #32 on April 10, 2018, 09:26:10 am by GazLaz »
The Young challenge was dreadful, very lucky not to be sent off.

idler

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 10725
Re: Liverpool v City
« Reply #33 on April 10, 2018, 09:46:50 am by idler »
If that challenge had been the other way round Mourinho would have been very critical. The trouble is lack of consistency by the officials. We have had one or two stone wallers denied this year but seen some very soft ones given.

rtid88

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 1409
Re: Liverpool v City
« Reply #34 on April 10, 2018, 11:58:38 am by rtid88 »
Off to the game tonight, really hoping for a goalfest!

GazLaz

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 12657
Re: Liverpool v City
« Reply #35 on April 10, 2018, 05:34:38 pm by GazLaz »
Liverpool are a bigger price to win the game tonigh than City are to qualify. That puts things into a bit of perspective.

leedshayter

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 344
Re: Liverpool v City
« Reply #36 on April 10, 2018, 05:39:42 pm by leedshayter »
Any streams for tonight’s game ? Thanks

Metalmicky

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 5421
Re: Liverpool v City
« Reply #37 on April 10, 2018, 07:06:50 pm by Metalmicky »
Salah plays - so breakaway goals are very possible.  If Liverpool get the first I think they will win it...

besty

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 1523
Re: Liverpool v City
« Reply #38 on April 10, 2018, 07:09:43 pm by besty »
Any streams for tonight’s game ? Thanks

This seems to be a perfect stream again guys

http://tsmsport.blogspot.co.uk/p/manchester-city.html

drfchound

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 29443
Re: Liverpool v City
« Reply #39 on April 10, 2018, 07:16:45 pm by drfchound »
Hi besty, I just clicked on your link and I am being asked to create a free account to be able to view.
Did you have to do the same and it is safe.

LincsRover

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 2875
Re: Liverpool v City
« Reply #40 on April 10, 2018, 07:16:51 pm by LincsRover »
Don’t normally bother with champions league or premiership but watching this on BTsports and quite excited at the prospect of a classic - I actually think (and had bet on) it will finish 4-1 (16/1) or 5-2 (50/1) to City with Liverpool qualifying on away goals.  :santa:
« Last Edit: April 10, 2018, 07:21:21 pm by LincsRover »

besty

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 1523
Re: Liverpool v City
« Reply #41 on April 10, 2018, 07:18:36 pm by besty »
Hi besty, I just clicked on your link and I am being asked to create a free account to be able to view.
Did you have to do the same and it is safe.

No just clicked on Watch Now closed any popups and good to go,no reports of any viruses from watching 1st leg so seems ok mate!

leedshayter

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 344
Re: Liverpool v City
« Reply #42 on April 10, 2018, 07:21:17 pm by leedshayter »
Top man besty thanks👍

drfchound

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 29443
Re: Liverpool v City
« Reply #43 on April 10, 2018, 07:55:19 pm by drfchound »
Well that has put the cat among the pigeons.

besty

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 1523
Re: Liverpool v City
« Reply #44 on April 10, 2018, 08:34:35 pm by besty »
What a great half,amazing how it is so one sided like the first leg

mushRTID

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 7472
Re: Liverpool v City
« Reply #45 on April 10, 2018, 08:36:32 pm by mushRTID »
Think city might regret not getting a second. Although they should have, that wasn’t offside.

Filo

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 29910
Re: Liverpool v City
« Reply #46 on April 10, 2018, 08:38:50 pm by Filo »
Think city might regret not getting a second. Although they should have, that wasn’t offside.

The only way he could be offside was if a City player played the ball, Milner played it

mushRTID

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 7472
Re: Liverpool v City
« Reply #47 on April 10, 2018, 08:41:25 pm by mushRTID »
Even then he was level

RoversAlias

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 11889
Re: Liverpool v City
« Reply #48 on April 10, 2018, 08:56:29 pm by RoversAlias »
Even then he was level

He wasn't, he was beyond the goalkeeper.

However, if it indeed came off Milner it should stand as a goal.

drfchound

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 29443
Re: Liverpool v City
« Reply #49 on April 10, 2018, 09:03:39 pm by drfchound »
Salah strikes.
That should do it for the Reds.

darren61

  • Newbie
Re: Liverpool v City
« Reply #50 on April 10, 2018, 09:07:20 pm by darren61 »
Good HD stream Besty, cheers

Filo

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 29910
Re: Liverpool v City
« Reply #51 on April 10, 2018, 09:08:24 pm by Filo »
Even then he was level

He wasn't, he was beyond the goalkeeper.

However, if it indeed came off Milner it should stand as a goal.

Does n't need to be the goalkeeper, it needs to be two players, usually the goalkeeper is one of those two players

RoversAlias

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 11889
Re: Liverpool v City
« Reply #52 on April 10, 2018, 09:11:25 pm by RoversAlias »
Even then he was level

He wasn't, he was beyond the goalkeeper.

However, if it indeed came off Milner it should stand as a goal.

Does n't need to be the goalkeeper, it needs to be two players, usually the goalkeeper is one of those two players

Yes exactly. Sane is level with the last Liverpool defender but to be onside you must be level with at least two opposition players of any description, since Sane is beyond the goalkeeper he's offside as there's only the defender there.

drfchound

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 29443
Re: Liverpool v City
« Reply #53 on April 10, 2018, 09:23:01 pm by drfchound »
Citeh done for now.
Well done Liverpool.

DevilMayCry

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 668
Re: Liverpool v City
« Reply #54 on April 10, 2018, 09:24:09 pm by DevilMayCry »
Deja-vu....City - United?

Filo

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 29910
Re: Liverpool v City
« Reply #55 on April 10, 2018, 09:24:33 pm by Filo »
Even then he was level

He wasn't, he was beyond the goalkeeper.

However, if it indeed came off Milner it should stand as a goal.

Does n't need to be the goalkeeper, it needs to be two players, usually the goalkeeper is one of those two players

Yes exactly. Sane is level with the last Liverpool defender but to be onside you must be level with at least two opposition players of any description, since Sane is beyond the goalkeeper he's offside as there's only the defender there.

The ball came off Milner, so he's onside

Filo

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 29910
Re: Liverpool v City
« Reply #56 on April 10, 2018, 09:25:28 pm by Filo »
Think this ref has had a bet on Liverpool, two legitimate goals ruled out for offside

DevilMayCry

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 668
Re: Liverpool v City
« Reply #57 on April 10, 2018, 09:25:56 pm by DevilMayCry »
3-0 for Roma against Barcelona...Wow  :woot: At this score Barcelona is out

drfchound

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 29443
Re: Liverpool v City
« Reply #58 on April 10, 2018, 09:26:39 pm by drfchound »
Even then he was level

He wasn't, he was beyond the goalkeeper.

However, if it indeed came off Milner it should stand as a goal.

Does n't need to be the goalkeeper, it needs to be two players, usually the goalkeeper is one of those two players

Yes exactly. Sane is level with the last Liverpool defender but to be onside you must be level with at least two opposition players of any description, since Sane is beyond the goalkeeper he's offside as there's only the defender there.

The ball came off Milner, so he's onside





As they used to say, it isn’t a goal, check in the paper tomorrow.

LincsRover

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 2875
Re: Liverpool v City
« Reply #59 on April 10, 2018, 09:33:04 pm by LincsRover »
Whether it should or should not have counted (I think it should but it’s academic now) one thing is for sure - city were absolute dog sh*te after that! Well deserved Liverpool win!
 :turd:

 

TinyPortal © 2005-2012