0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Shame as Tisdale could’ve been a good fit for us. Whilst I understand the business like way in which the club recruits a new manager, the process means we can’t / won’t be proactive enough to approach a viable candidate to persuade him to join. It seems to be more focussed on the candidate persuading us to take them on.
QuoteRovers are looking for a candidate who can display the ability to manage in the Sky Bet Championship. That would have ruled Tisdale out anyway, League 1 for two years is the highest he’s been.
Quote from: steve@dcfd on June 06, 2018, 03:00:29 pmQuoteRovers are looking for a candidate who can display the ability to manage in the Sky Bet Championship. That would have ruled Tisdale out anyway, League 1 for two years is the highest he’s been.If that is the wording of the advert, then I would argue that a good candidate could display the required ability to manage at championship level without necessarily having managed there. I’m not aware that championship experience is part of the essential criteria. I hope we aren’t ruling out candidates that have never managed in the championship, as if we did that then not only would it mean we couldn’t appoint Zidane, but we’d be restricting our options to failed championship managers only. I’d much rather we picked someone with the potential to grow with the club.
hes in the running for the leeds job apparently
Dickos, whether he got the job or not, for it to be known that he had applied for the job before May 20th while in our employ would not sit well with the Board, or our supporters if common knowledge. It's underhand, and shows that he was not 100% committed to the Rovers, something he has put a couple of young players out to dry publicly when he has questioned their commitment. It's double standards, we are well shut of.