0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Thought he lost his way this season and I'd prefer McCullough in the holding role BUT on a free its a no brainer
JORDAN would want far to much wages, the club would never pay them, so in that case luke is better for the money unless the new man wants his own lads in
Quote from: the vicar on June 09, 2018, 02:35:49 pmJORDAN would want far to much wages, the club would never pay them, so in that case luke is better for the money unless the new man wants his own lads inWe did agree a deal with him during the January window and therefore he agreed the terms we put to him.
Quote from: silent majority on June 09, 2018, 03:23:49 pmQuote from: the vicar on June 09, 2018, 02:35:49 pmJORDAN would want far to much wages, the club would never pay them, so in that case luke is better for the money unless the new man wants his own lads inWe did agree a deal with him during the January window and therefore he agreed the terms we put to him.It was reported that he hadn't agreed Personal terms , although a deal was done with Chelsea. Jordan Houghton insists a desire not to rush things was the reason behind his decision not to sign a permanent contract with Doncaster Rovers. A full transfer for the 22-year-old was agreed between Rovers and Chelsea last week only for Houghton to fail to agree personal terms. And he instead extended his loan spell for the rest of the season.
Quote from: eastender on June 09, 2018, 03:38:22 pmQuote from: silent majority on June 09, 2018, 03:23:49 pmQuote from: the vicar on June 09, 2018, 02:35:49 pmJORDAN would want far to much wages, the club would never pay them, so in that case luke is better for the money unless the new man wants his own lads inWe did agree a deal with him during the January window and therefore he agreed the terms we put to him.It was reported that he hadn't agreed Personal terms , although a deal was done with Chelsea. Jordan Houghton insists a desire not to rush things was the reason behind his decision not to sign a permanent contract with Doncaster Rovers. A full transfer for the 22-year-old was agreed between Rovers and Chelsea last week only for Houghton to fail to agree personal terms. And he instead extended his loan spell for the rest of the season.I was also told we couldn't afford to pay the terms he wanted. No doubt some will now come on and say we are both wrong.
Residence?
Quote from: Dutch Uncle on June 09, 2018, 05:50:13 pmResidence?Yes, pretty much.
Quote from: silent majority on June 09, 2018, 05:51:55 pmQuote from: Dutch Uncle on June 09, 2018, 05:50:13 pmResidence?Yes, pretty much.So we agreed to give him somewhere to live but didn't agree a salary package?
Rumour has it that his soon to be wife didn’t fancy committing to living in Doncaster on a permanent basis at the time. Goodness knows why. I’d like to think the deal isn’t dead. He’s a very good player with lots of potential, and I think he’d be an asset to the club. But our current managerless status does probably complicate things a little.
Quote from: Cantley Rover on June 09, 2018, 07:02:29 pmQuote from: silent majority on June 09, 2018, 05:51:55 pmQuote from: Dutch Uncle on June 09, 2018, 05:50:13 pmResidence?Yes, pretty much.So we agreed to give him somewhere to live but didn't agree a salary package?This is all personal information, why should we have the right to know?I wouldn’t have wanted my personal work package known to the world at large.