0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I’m not saying he’s a bad player, And we would be lost without him. But he’s just not scoring it’s irrelevent that he scored all the goals in the first half of the season. He hasn’t scored a goal in open play in 11 games, even players such as Kane would be given a rest with a run as bad as that. I see no reason to not try a front three of copps, sadlier and wilkes
Strange isn’t it he was a superstar in January judging by most of the comments on here. Many thought he was on his way for 2 million +Now he is suddenly a villain because the goals have dried up.Football supporters eh bloody rubbish. I tell you what when he is banging the goals in next season for someone else there are going to be some red faces on here.CAREFUL WHAT YOU WISH FOR. Slagging off a player with a one in two goal scoring record is not a clever move imo.
DickosActually, Spurs were not winning every week. Their record in that period was:P13 W4 D6 L3.Which is God awful form for them.The principle is that if you have a proven goalscorer who is going through a bad patch, you stick with him.
Quote from: BillyStubbsTears on April 25, 2019, 02:11:09 pmDickosActually, Spurs were not winning every week. Their record in that period was:P13 W4 D6 L3.Which is God awful form for them.The principle is that if you have a proven goalscorer who is going through a bad patch, you stick with him.Spurs record is actually better without Kane so maybe they should have dropped him. Either way, I’m not suggesting he’s useless or we should get rid. But he’s not even looking like scoring at the moment and in my opinion a slight change of the front 3 at this moment in time would benefit us.
Quote from: scawsby steve on April 25, 2019, 04:13:48 pmI've said on here time and time again, we can't drop John because he's the only natural centre forward in the squad; it's a specialist position that not every player can adapt to.Whether John stays or not, it's essential that GM has at least 2 players for this position next season, even if it means converting someone to play it; maybe one of the younger players.One thing's for certain, if John does leave, whoever replaces him will have to be very very good to achieve anything near what John's achieved over the last 3 seasons.I've always been keen to see Marquis up top in a simple front two with a natural big man who'll win balls, headers, flicks, draw defenders, etc, and be a general pain in the arse to mark and play against.It wouldn't be stylish by any means but straight away the defenders would know they're going to be in for a horrible battle.And the big boys presence may certainly allow Marquis to capitalise on his undoubted instincts and score more goals. People may also then just realise what a job he's done this season, on the whole, to be the focal point of the attack, working his nuts off AND the main goalscorer, too.
I've said on here time and time again, we can't drop John because he's the only natural centre forward in the squad; it's a specialist position that not every player can adapt to.Whether John stays or not, it's essential that GM has at least 2 players for this position next season, even if it means converting someone to play it; maybe one of the younger players.One thing's for certain, if John does leave, whoever replaces him will have to be very very good to achieve anything near what John's achieved over the last 3 seasons.
Quote from: Rigoglioso on April 25, 2019, 04:27:39 pmQuote from: scawsby steve on April 25, 2019, 04:13:48 pmI've said on here time and time again, we can't drop John because he's the only natural centre forward in the squad; it's a specialist position that not every player can adapt to.Whether John stays or not, it's essential that GM has at least 2 players for this position next season, even if it means converting someone to play it; maybe one of the younger players.One thing's for certain, if John does leave, whoever replaces him will have to be very very good to achieve anything near what John's achieved over the last 3 seasons.I've always been keen to see Marquis up top in a simple front two with a natural big man who'll win balls, headers, flicks, draw defenders, etc, and be a general pain in the arse to mark and play against.It wouldn't be stylish by any means but straight away the defenders would know they're going to be in for a horrible battle.And the big boys presence may certainly allow Marquis to capitalise on his undoubted instincts and score more goals. People may also then just realise what a job he's done this season, on the whole, to be the focal point of the attack, working his nuts off AND the main goalscorer, too.I agree with that Rigo, a Chris Brown type of player to play with John would be perfect.
Quote from: dickos1 on April 25, 2019, 10:48:57 amI’m not saying he’s a bad player, And we would be lost without him. But he’s just not scoring it’s irrelevent that he scored all the goals in the first half of the season. He hasn’t scored a goal in open play in 11 games, even players such as Kane would be given a rest with a run as bad as that. I see no reason to not try a front three of copps, sadlier and wilkesLike City rest Guero and play Jesus?Who’s as good as Marquis at our club?
Quote from: dickos1 on April 25, 2019, 02:55:44 pmQuote from: BillyStubbsTears on April 25, 2019, 02:11:09 pmDickosActually, Spurs were not winning every week. Their record in that period was:P13 W4 D6 L3.Which is God awful form for them.The principle is that if you have a proven goalscorer who is going through a bad patch, you stick with him.Spurs record is actually better without Kane so maybe they should have dropped him. Either way, I’m not suggesting he’s useless or we should get rid. But he’s not even looking like scoring at the moment and in my opinion a slight change of the front 3 at this moment in time would benefit us. So who would be your front three?
Quote from: steve@dcfd on April 25, 2019, 03:00:42 pmQuote from: dickos1 on April 25, 2019, 02:55:44 pmQuote from: BillyStubbsTears on April 25, 2019, 02:11:09 pmDickosActually, Spurs were not winning every week. Their record in that period was:P13 W4 D6 L3.Which is God awful form for them.The principle is that if you have a proven goalscorer who is going through a bad patch, you stick with him.Spurs record is actually better without Kane so maybe they should have dropped him. Either way, I’m not suggesting he’s useless or we should get rid. But he’s not even looking like scoring at the moment and in my opinion a slight change of the front 3 at this moment in time would benefit us. So who would be your front three?I’d have marquis in my front 3 usually, but for the last two games I’d play wilkes centrally with copps and sadlier. Or I’d play Blair with sadlier and wilks and play copps in the middle with whiteman and Kane
Quote from: southwestexile on April 25, 2019, 06:56:36 pmQuote from: dickos1 on April 25, 2019, 10:48:57 amI’m not saying he’s a bad player, And we would be lost without him. But he’s just not scoring it’s irrelevent that he scored all the goals in the first half of the season. He hasn’t scored a goal in open play in 11 games, even players such as Kane would be given a rest with a run as bad as that. I see no reason to not try a front three of copps, sadlier and wilkesLike City rest Guero and play Jesus?Who’s as good as Marquis at our club?City do rest aguero, quite often
Quote from: drfchound on April 24, 2019, 08:20:12 pmQuote from: sha66y on April 24, 2019, 08:18:14 pmQuote from: Branton Rover on April 24, 2019, 08:07:30 pmThat’s called form - & for an out of form striker one goal ca. Propel him back to somewhere near his best JM has lost his form and is not scoring goals , the team by all accounts are not working hard enough to get JM into goal scoring positions, there are only 2 games left, we need to win both games to be certain of a very undeserved play off place , repeat ,.....repeat,.....repeat......Why would it be underserved if we get it?It would have been earned over 46 matches.Because we have been playing crap in too many games and been saved by the odd bit of fortune....
Quote from: sha66y on April 24, 2019, 08:18:14 pmQuote from: Branton Rover on April 24, 2019, 08:07:30 pmThat’s called form - & for an out of form striker one goal ca. Propel him back to somewhere near his best JM has lost his form and is not scoring goals , the team by all accounts are not working hard enough to get JM into goal scoring positions, there are only 2 games left, we need to win both games to be certain of a very undeserved play off place , repeat ,.....repeat,.....repeat......Why would it be underserved if we get it?It would have been earned over 46 matches.
Quote from: Branton Rover on April 24, 2019, 08:07:30 pmThat’s called form - & for an out of form striker one goal ca. Propel him back to somewhere near his best JM has lost his form and is not scoring goals , the team by all accounts are not working hard enough to get JM into goal scoring positions, there are only 2 games left, we need to win both games to be certain of a very undeserved play off place , repeat ,.....repeat,.....repeat......
That’s called form - & for an out of form striker one goal ca. Propel him back to somewhere near his best
Quote from: Campsall rover on April 25, 2019, 12:10:38 pmStrange isn’t it he was a superstar in January judging by most of the comments on here. Many thought he was on his way for 2 million +Now he is suddenly a villain because the goals have dried up.Football supporters eh bloody rubbish. I tell you what when he is banging the goals in next season for someone else there are going to be some red faces on here.CAREFUL WHAT YOU WISH FOR. Slagging off a player with a one in two goal scoring record is not a clever move imo. Not slagging him off,And I’m sure his form will return but no goals in 11 games is not helping us at all at this crucial time of the season And a rest may do him and us some good
Quote from: dickos1 on April 25, 2019, 12:34:35 pmQuote from: Campsall rover on April 25, 2019, 12:10:38 pmStrange isn’t it he was a superstar in January judging by most of the comments on here. Many thought he was on his way for 2 million +Now he is suddenly a villain because the goals have dried up.Football supporters eh bloody rubbish. I tell you what when he is banging the goals in next season for someone else there are going to be some red faces on here.CAREFUL WHAT YOU WISH FOR. Slagging off a player with a one in two goal scoring record is not a clever move imo. Not slagging him off,And I’m sure his form will return but no goals in 11 games is not helping us at all at this crucial time of the season And a rest may do him and us some goodHow does he start scoring again if he’s dropped from the team?
Of course he’s been getting the service, he missed two good chances on Tuesday evening, the chances he was putting away earlier in the season he just simply isn’t putting away now. A game or two out may do him some good. And give the likes of sadlier and wilks the opportunity to step up