0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
It makes you wonder what they were determined to hide?
Chris Grayling really is a once-in-a-generation kind of politician. Losing a rigged vote that he was parachuted in to win is Alan B'stard stuff.
Christ, Alok Sharma on R4 this morning. Asked 5 or 6 times about the Intelligence Committee issue and every time he said, "That's a matter for the party whips."So what in the name of God was the point of you going on?
Quote from: BillyStubbsTears on July 16, 2020, 09:37:57 amChrist, Alok Sharma on R4 this morning. Asked 5 or 6 times about the Intelligence Committee issue and every time he said, "That's a matter for the party whips."So what in the name of God was the point of you going on?It isn’t a matter for the party whips though, the intelligence comittee elect their own chairman independently of the executive, the chief whip and No. 10 have overstepped their remit
We'd have published anyway even if grayling got the job, a spokesman said ''The government is to finally publish the greatly anticipated Russia report before the summer parliamentary recess begins next week.A statement from the intelligence and security committee said:The intelligence and security committee has unanimously agreed this morning that it will publish the Report on Russia prepared by its predecessor before the house rises for the summer recess. There will be no further comment''
In a statement issued to the Press Association this morning, Mr Lewis said he did not ever confirm he would vote for Mr Grayling, and said the Prime Ministser did not legally have the power to select the chairperson.He said: “Because the ISC (Intelligence and Security Committee) is a special committee, I feel constrained in what I can say.“However, the following points are relevant: The 2013 Justice and Security Act explicitly removed the right of the Prime Minister to choose the ISC chairman and gave it to the committee members. "I remember this well, as I served on the committee from 2010 to 2015 and took part of the legislation through the Commons myself on behalf of the committee. There is no other Conservative MP in the House of Commons with any past experience of working on the ISC."It was only yesterday afternoon that I received a text asking me to confirm that I would be voting for the Prime Minister’s preferred candidate for the ISC chair."I did not reply as I considered it an improper request. At no earlier stage did I give any undertaking to vote for any particular candidate."In recent days, the official No 10 spokesman explicitly denied that the Government was seeking to ‘parachute’ a preferred candidate in to the chair, stating that it was a matter for the senior parliamentarians on the committee to decide.“It is therefore strange to have the whip removed for failing to vote for the Government’s preferred candidate.”
Julian Lewiss speaks out Quote In a statement issued to the Press Association this morning, Mr Lewis said he did not ever confirm he would vote for Mr Grayling, and said the Prime Ministser did not legally have the power to select the chairperson.He said: “Because the ISC (Intelligence and Security Committee) is a special committee, I feel constrained in what I can say.“However, the following points are relevant: The 2013 Justice and Security Act explicitly removed the right of the Prime Minister to choose the ISC chairman and gave it to the committee members. "I remember this well, as I served on the committee from 2010 to 2015 and took part of the legislation through the Commons myself on behalf of the committee. There is no other Conservative MP in the House of Commons with any past experience of working on the ISC."It was only yesterday afternoon that I received a text asking me to confirm that I would be voting for the Prime Minister’s preferred candidate for the ISC chair."I did not reply as I considered it an improper request. At no earlier stage did I give any undertaking to vote for any particular candidate."In recent days, the official No 10 spokesman explicitly denied that the Government was seeking to ‘parachute’ a preferred candidate in to the chair, stating that it was a matter for the senior parliamentarians on the committee to decide.“It is therefore strange to have the whip removed for failing to vote for the Government’s preferred candidate.” https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/18586583.mp-julian-lewis-issues-statement-sacked-conservatives/ This government is turning into a dictatorship!
I wonder just what there is in the Russia Report that has the Govt running so scared?Now they are trying to muddy the waters by pushing this back into the media.https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-53433523
Quote from: BillyStubbsTears on July 16, 2020, 03:42:04 pmI wonder just what there is in the Russia Report that has the Govt running so scared?Now they are trying to muddy the waters by pushing this back into the media.https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-53433523https://twitter.com/ITVNewsPolitics/status/1283786417206956034?s=09And they're trying to switch it on to Corbyn.