0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Won't get much response on this forum with that post Sidders,PFI was a Labour scheme.
That is a very poorly selected example which are oft used in these scenarios. What you'll get in the payment mechanism is values applied to various elements which the individual tenders will attribute different values. Thus if you pick an individual item it may well look ridiculous. It's a very strange but true practice that I've seen many times, often adjusted by the client themself to ensure a tender goes through.Some elements of it worked really well that cannot be denied.As for the political side of it labour favoured it very well and still in some situations do. Outsourcing has huge benefits when applied correctly.
I'm ok sidders missus not well , so I have got my apron on and utilising my City and guilds in catering! 👍🏻
''Nepotism, fraud, waste and cheating ... welcome to England's school system''''Included in her hit list of bad practices are failed government initiatives that deprive schools of badly needed cash. Malmesbury school in Wiltshire, for example, has to pay £40 a month for “managing” a canteen bench bought by PFI, on top of installation costs. With 13 years of the contract still to run, it works out at £6,240 just for its “management”''What's going on down there Wilts?https://www.theguardian.com/education/2020/sep/08/nepotism-waste-and-cheating-welcome-to-englands-school-system#comment-143559820