Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 16, 2024, 10:28:46 am

Login with username, password and session length

Links


FSA logo

Author Topic: Sunderland v TLOD  (Read 9773 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

drfchound

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 29370
Re: Sunderland v TLOD
« Reply #210 on February 13, 2021, 05:07:28 pm by drfchound »
Based on today the starting line up for Accrington should be in my opinion:

Balcombe
Halliday RB
Wright CH
Anderson (if available, if not Butler) CH
James LB
Bostock CDM
Sims LM
Richards CAM
Smith CM
Lokilo RM
Bogle CF






Not bad but surely Fej in ahead of Lokilo.



(want to hide these ads? Join the VSC today!)

goalkick

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 1716
Re: Sunderland v TLOD
« Reply #211 on February 13, 2021, 05:11:07 pm by goalkick »
Maybe missed Anderson’s leadership.did not seem as though we had a designated penalty taker. Worst penalties I can remember seeing for a long time.very half hearted.but onwards and upwards we are still in a great position in the table.we can’t be that bad.

Bessie Red

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 2302
Re: Sunderland v TLOD
« Reply #212 on February 13, 2021, 05:16:06 pm by Bessie Red »
On reflection I don't believe we would have lost that game if Anderson had played. The team didnt play too badly but we just couldn't handle McGeady & Wyke. Big Tom would've had Wyke under control & he definitely wouldnt have had the space he was allowed. Anderson is so important to us and it has clearly shown over these past two games.

Bessie Red

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 2302
Re: Sunderland v TLOD
« Reply #213 on February 13, 2021, 05:18:07 pm by Bessie Red »
On reflection I don't believe we would have lost that game if Anderson had played. The team didnt play too badly but we just couldn't handle McGeady & Wyke. Big Tom would've had Wyke under control & he definitely wouldnt have had the space he was allowed. Anderson is so important to us and it has clearly shown over these past two games.
Based on today the starting line up for Accrington should be in my opinion:

Balcombe
Halliday RB
Wright CH
Anderson (if available, if not Butler) CH
James LB
Bostock CDM
Sims LM
Richards CAM
Smith CM
Lokilo RM
Bogle CF






Not bad but surely Fej in ahead of Lokilo.
Based on today I would keep Lokilo in, I thought he caused them alot of problems when he came on.

Filo

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 29887
Re: Sunderland v TLOD
« Reply #214 on February 13, 2021, 05:31:23 pm by Filo »
It seems we’ve overlooked the fact we haven’t got a designated penalty taker, which in that case you have to give it to the best striker of the ball, both Taylor and Lokilo are not good strikers of the ball, awful display, awful decision making, needs sorting pronto, esprcially the balls coming into the box





The manager should have decided before the game who is the penalty taker.

How do we know he didn’t and they were the ones selected?


COYR





Precisely, we don’t.
Filo said we don’t have a designated penalty taker.
You should have been jumping on his post, not mine.

It was him sir not me, not me

TheFunk

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 1445
Re: Sunderland v TLOD
« Reply #215 on February 13, 2021, 06:06:25 pm by TheFunk »
Bizarrely that's the best we've played with the ball in ages. Without the ball the worst we've played in years. Wright and Butler couldn't handle Wyke when he played for Bradford so I feared the worst before kick off and he didn't have McGeady landing balls on his head then.

idler

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 10706
Re: Sunderland v TLOD
« Reply #216 on February 13, 2021, 06:14:13 pm by idler »
I bet Fej was gutted sat on the bench and two penalties.  If we had scored our first penalty we wouldn't have conceded the 4th goal a minute later.
3-2 for a bit and they might have panicked.

Filo

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 29887
Re: Sunderland v TLOD
« Reply #217 on February 13, 2021, 06:28:20 pm by Filo »
I bet Fej was gutted sat on the bench and two penalties.  If we had scored our first penalty we wouldn't have conceded the 4th goal a minute later.
3-2 for a bit and they might have panicked.

You’ve got me doubting myself but I thunk it was already 4-1 before we got the first pen

idler

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 10706
Re: Sunderland v TLOD
« Reply #218 on February 13, 2021, 06:34:51 pm by idler »
You might be right Filo. I thought on the BBC site we missed a pen and they scored very quickly after but I might have got it wrong. At least I won't bother with the extended highlights to check.☹️

Filo

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 29887
Re: Sunderland v TLOD
« Reply #219 on February 13, 2021, 06:39:16 pm by Filo »
You might be right Filo. I thought on the BBC site we missed a pen and they scored very quickly after but I might have got it wrong. At least I won't bother with the extended highlights to check.☹️

We scored on 53mins, they scored on 54mins, we got the pen on 57mins

drfchound

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 29370
Re: Sunderland v TLOD
« Reply #220 on February 13, 2021, 07:35:51 pm by drfchound »
It seems we’ve overlooked the fact we haven’t got a designated penalty taker, which in that case you have to give it to the best striker of the ball, both Taylor and Lokilo are not good strikers of the ball, awful display, awful decision making, needs sorting pronto, esprcially the balls coming into the box





The manager should have decided before the game who is the penalty taker.

How do we know he didn’t and they were the ones selected?


COYR





Precisely, we don’t.
Filo said we don’t have a designated penalty taker.
You should have been jumping on his post, not mine.

It was him sir not me, not me






Filo, that is the truth though isn’t it.
Why don’t you take kindly to people pointing out stuff you have said.
You seem to think it is ok when you decide to have a pop at my posts.

idler

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 10706
Re: Sunderland v TLOD
« Reply #221 on February 13, 2021, 07:39:41 pm by idler »
You might be right Filo. I thought on the BBC site we missed a pen and they scored very quickly after but I might have got it wrong. At least I won't bother with the extended highlights to check.☹️

We scored on 53mins, they scored on 54mins, we got the pen on 57mins
Chers Filo, I was checking on BBC at the time in between other jobs so was mistaken. That sure was a hectic few minutes though.

Filo

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 29887
Re: Sunderland v TLOD
« Reply #222 on February 13, 2021, 07:44:09 pm by Filo »
It seems we’ve overlooked the fact we haven’t got a designated penalty taker, which in that case you have to give it to the best striker of the ball, both Taylor and Lokilo are not good strikers of the ball, awful display, awful decision making, needs sorting pronto, esprcially the balls coming into the box





The manager should have decided before the game who is the penalty taker.

How do we know he didn’t and they were the ones selected?


COYR





Precisely, we don’t.
Filo said we don’t have a designated penalty taker.
You should have been jumping on his post, not mine.

It was him sir not me, not me






Filo, that is the truth though isn’t it.
Why don’t you take kindly to people pointing out stuff you have said.
You seem to think it is ok when you decide to have a pop at my posts.

Because I never said we didn’t have a designated penalty taker, you are fond of using word play when it suits you, what i did say was It SEEMS we’ve overlooked the fact we haven’t got a designated penalty taker


The key word is SEEMS, that in the context of the post is me expressing an opinion, but true to form when someone challenges your post you go all defensive and blame some one else

drfchound

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 29370
Re: Sunderland v TLOD
« Reply #223 on February 13, 2021, 07:53:28 pm by drfchound »
It seems we’ve overlooked the fact we haven’t got a designated penalty taker, which in that case you have to give it to the best striker of the ball, both Taylor and Lokilo are not good strikers of the ball, awful display, awful decision making, needs sorting pronto, esprcially the balls coming into the box





The manager should have decided before the game who is the penalty taker.

How do we know he didn’t and they were the ones selected?


COYR





Precisely, we don’t.
Filo said we don’t have a designated penalty taker.
You should have been jumping on his post, not mine.

It was him sir not me, not me






Filo, that is the truth though isn’t it.
Why don’t you take kindly to people pointing out stuff you have said.
You seem to think it is ok when you decide to have a pop at my posts.

Because I never said we didn’t have a designated penalty taker, you are fond of using word play when it suits you, what i did say was It SEEMS we’ve overlooked the fact we haven’t got a designated penalty taker


The key word is SEEMS, that in the context of the post is me expressing an opinion, but true to form when someone challenges your post you go all defensive and blame some one else






That is ridiculous and you know it.
You were clearly having a go at Moore for not having designated penalty taker but in true political fashion you are twisting the words to suit your argument.
I simply pointed out that the manager should have decided before the game who the penalty taker would be.
I fail to see why you object to that.

You really dont like anyone to point out something that you have written might just be wrong.

Bring on the cavalry now.

Filo

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 29887
Re: Sunderland v TLOD
« Reply #224 on February 13, 2021, 07:57:37 pm by Filo »
No cavalry needed, I can argue my own points, you have a habit of twisting things and blaming some one else when one of your posts is pulled up

drfchound

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 29370
Re: Sunderland v TLOD
« Reply #225 on February 13, 2021, 08:05:44 pm by drfchound »
LoL.

Put the toys back in your pram.
It is you who got the tits on about me pulling you up on you suggesting we didn’t have a designated penalty taker.
Anyone can see that.

« Last Edit: February 13, 2021, 08:52:36 pm by drfchound »

 

TinyPortal © 2005-2012