Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
December 08, 2025, 02:49:34 pm

Login with username, password and session length

Links


Join the VSC


FSA logo

Author Topic: If there were no ‘nukes’.  (Read 822 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Colin C No.3

  • Newbie
If there were no ‘nukes’.
« on March 01, 2022, 05:38:12 pm by Colin C No.3 »
If wars were still fought with ‘conventional weapons’, would you (personally) want NATO to send troops into Ukraine?

I feel it is the horrifying thought (certainty) that Putin would start a Nuclear War on the first pretext that the ‘West’ gave him that stops us from ‘engaging’ his army militarily. But would The States be prepared to lose soldiers in what would be essentially be another ‘European War’?

Just wondering on peoples thoughts given that scenario.



(want to hide these ads? Join the VSC today!)

tyke1962

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 4295
Re: If there were no ‘nukes’.
« Reply #1 on March 01, 2022, 05:44:53 pm by tyke1962 »
Without question .

selby

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 12781
Re: If there were no ‘nukes’.
« Reply #2 on March 01, 2022, 05:55:14 pm by selby »
  That column of armour rolling down that road would not exist. The Yanks love a Turkey shoot.

Filo

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 31681
Re: If there were no ‘nukes’.
« Reply #3 on March 01, 2022, 05:57:45 pm by Filo »
  That column of armour rolling down that road would not exist. The Yanks love a Turkey shoot.

That column apparently has n’t moved in the last 24 hours, running out of supplies, or not really wanting  to go into battle?

drfchound

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 34627
Re: If there were no ‘nukes’.
« Reply #4 on March 01, 2022, 07:23:14 pm by drfchound »
  That column of armour rolling down that road would not exist. The Yanks love a Turkey shoot.

That column apparently has n’t moved in the last 24 hours, running out of supplies, or not really wanting  to go into battle?

Both, you would hope.

normal rules

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 8459
Re: If there were no ‘nukes’.
« Reply #5 on March 01, 2022, 07:29:59 pm by normal rules »
Or they have been placed on standby pending an artillery and missile pounding of Kyiv, prior to going in to sweep through with ground troops.
The Russians have an MLRS system not dissimilar to one Uk forces have.
It deploys a barrage of rockets that quite literally obliterates a whole square kilometre at a time.

BobG

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 11359
Re: If there were no ‘nukes’.
« Reply #6 on March 07, 2022, 11:03:57 am by BobG »
Jesús Christ... tell me that ain't true. Please?

We don't  deserve this planet.

BobG

BillyStubbsTears

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 40560
Re: If there were no ‘nukes’.
« Reply #7 on March 07, 2022, 11:30:17 am by BillyStubbsTears »
Why should we be surprised?

He's obliterated Grozny.

He's obliterated Aleppo.

There's a fascist in here who applauded those acts by the way.

Why shouldn't we expect Putin to obliterate Kyiv?

He has only one redeeming feature to the Russian people. He shows how strong Russia is and how it can smack down weaker upstarts. Of course he's going to do this to Kyiv and Kharkhiv. 

SydneyRover

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 18109
Re: If there were no ‘nukes’.
« Reply #8 on March 07, 2022, 11:33:49 am by SydneyRover »
there's is a flickering light ................ although this war maybe easier due to it's proximity the world didn't really punish russia for previous wars, not like this.

 

TinyPortal © 2005-2012