Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
January 12, 2026, 08:54:53 am

Login with username, password and session length

Links


Join the VSC


FSA logo

Author Topic: Portsmouth  (Read 2433 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.




(want to hide these ads? Join the VSC today!)

Glyn_Wigley

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 12576
Re: Portsmouth
« Reply #1 on January 16, 2023, 07:18:48 pm by Glyn_Wigley »
Sack the board!!

silent majority

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 17179
Re: Portsmouth
« Reply #2 on January 17, 2023, 11:05:51 am by silent majority »
There's a lot of clubs who are in this position, not just us.

Legislation over the years has been brought forward to stop clubs 'self harming' yet there is a mindset in amongst the fan bases that demand that clubs do this. It can't continue.

roversdude

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 14059
Re: Portsmouth
« Reply #3 on January 17, 2023, 12:16:50 pm by roversdude »
Totally agree SM if clubs/fans aren’t prepared to learn lessons from football then they need look no further than Rugby Union

Chris Black come back

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 16405
Re: Portsmouth
« Reply #4 on January 17, 2023, 12:55:47 pm by Chris Black come back »
Portsmouth don’t seem massively overexposed fundamentally. Total wage bill of £7.8m on gates of 18,000 seems fairly sensible gearing.

roversdude

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 14059
Re: Portsmouth
« Reply #5 on January 17, 2023, 12:59:53 pm by roversdude »
Would imagine with their “previous” they will be very wary about debt

DonnyBazR0ver

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 19995
Re: Portsmouth
« Reply #6 on January 17, 2023, 06:02:05 pm by DonnyBazR0ver »
Portsmouth don’t seem massively overexposed fundamentally. Total wage bill of £7.8m on gates of 18,000 seems fairly sensible gearing.

They're improving the stadium considerably and last time I heard their head honcho, he seemed to have his head screwed on how they intended to move the club forward.

BigH

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 1478
Re: Portsmouth
« Reply #7 on January 17, 2023, 06:23:55 pm by BigH »
Would imagine with their “previous” they will be very wary about debt
Wouldn’t be surprised if they’re still paying it off!

karldew

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 2215
Re: Portsmouth
« Reply #8 on January 20, 2023, 04:29:29 pm by karldew »
Director of Pompey Eric Eisner on Twitter:

“Just FYI, John was not picked because he was the cheap option; he was picked because we thought he is the best choice. Every time we talked to him, the more impressed we became by him. We are happy to welcome John and have him work with Rich to build and lead the first team. #pup”

Sounds like a reply to our fans :lol:

vaya

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 3017
Re: Portsmouth
« Reply #9 on January 20, 2023, 04:40:45 pm by vaya »
Director of Pompey Eric Eisner on Twitter:

“Just FYI, John was not picked because he was the cheap option; he was picked because we thought he is the best choice. Every time we talked to him, the more impressed we became by him. We are happy to welcome John and have him work with Rich to build and lead the first team. #pup”

Sounds like a reply to our fans :lol:

They've appointed the auto-complete Jose Mourinho:


https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/64335646

ForsolongaRover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 2103
Re: Portsmouth
« Reply #10 on January 20, 2023, 05:13:35 pm by ForsolongaRover »
I suppose that they have exhausted the second-hand market, generally playing safe in the past and it really hasn't delivered what they are after.

 

TinyPortal © 2005-2012