Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
January 24, 2026, 11:29:30 pm

Login with username, password and session length

Links


Join the VSC


FSA logo

Author Topic: Mitchell  (Read 7653 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

ncRover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 5538
Re: Mitchell
« Reply #30 on January 28, 2023, 07:54:06 pm by ncRover »
Mitchell, Anderson, Ro Shaun and Seaman all horrific today.

All thankfully out of contract at the end of this season. Unless the club takes further leave of it’s senses.



(want to hide these ads? Join the VSC today!)

ravenrover

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 11358
Re: Mitchell
« Reply #31 on January 28, 2023, 08:06:31 pm by ravenrover »
Much better when Lavery came on and as for the miss.... well least said about that but a clear penalty but not clear enough to the lino!

ncRover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 5538
Re: Mitchell
« Reply #32 on January 28, 2023, 08:11:18 pm by ncRover »
Much better when Lavery came on and as for the miss.... well least said about that but a clear penalty but not clear enough to the lino!

Shocking miss. Miller is very short on confidence. He should have shot in the first half but laid it off to Charlie f*****g Seaman.

Anderson been a good player for us in general but his performance today reminded me of that container ship that got stuck in the Suez Canal. Time to go.

Branton Red

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 1295
Re: Mitchell
« Reply #33 on January 28, 2023, 08:11:54 pm by Branton Red »
I don't think Mitchell is terrible, far from it, but the number of goals we concede plus the number he has been, at least partly, culpable of recently mean it's beyond time for him to be taken out of the firing line, and to give our other senior goalkeeper a chance.

donnievic

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 4013
Re: Mitchell
« Reply #34 on January 28, 2023, 08:16:41 pm by donnievic »
Yeah 3rd goal got caught too fair out in no man’s land but Anderson shouldn’t have been beaten easily like he did,Akins bullied our defenders all game

donnievic

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 4013
Re: Mitchell
« Reply #35 on January 28, 2023, 08:28:01 pm by donnievic »
Mitchell could have claimed the cross for the first goal but dithered
wow there is blaming a player and then there is just coming out with blaming sumone for sake of it

donnievic

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 4013
Re: Mitchell
« Reply #36 on January 28, 2023, 08:29:04 pm by donnievic »
Mitchell, Anderson, Ro Shaun and Seaman all horrific today.

All thankfully out of contract at the end of this season. Unless the club takes further leave of it’s senses.
you also missed molyneux out

Filo

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 31814
Re: Mitchell
« Reply #37 on January 28, 2023, 08:32:16 pm by Filo »
Mitchell could have claimed the cross for the first goal but dithered
wow there is blaming a player and then there is just coming out with blaming sumone for sake of it

Watch it back and tell me why you disagree

ncRover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 5538
Re: Mitchell
« Reply #38 on January 28, 2023, 08:37:50 pm by ncRover »
We need some proper leaders, defenders and players who will set high standards and ensure the others properly get stuck in. Too many nice lads.

steve@dcfd

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 10136
Re: Mitchell
« Reply #39 on January 28, 2023, 08:47:26 pm by steve@dcfd »
Mitchell, Anderson, Ro Shaun and Seaman all horrific today.

All thankfully out of contract at the end of this season. Unless the club takes further leave of it’s senses.
But we have to replace them with better in the summer and our signings over the last two years are getting worse so what makes you think we can get better. We can only get value for the money we have which appears to be declining year on year especially when it comes to permanent signings

ncRover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 5538
Re: Mitchell
« Reply #40 on January 28, 2023, 09:03:16 pm by ncRover »
Mitchell, Anderson, Ro Shaun and Seaman all horrific today.

All thankfully out of contract at the end of this season. Unless the club takes further leave of it’s senses.
But we have to replace them with better in the summer and our signings over the last two years are getting worse so what makes you think we can get better. We can only get value for the money we have which appears to be declining year on year especially when it comes to permanent signings

Hard to argue with that. I don’t know where our wage budget ranks in the division.

I wonder if Coppinger has a plan for summer and a list of potential targets? Or some sort of proactive method for identifying targets? Would be nice to hear from him.

Red wizard

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 2162
Re: Mitchell
« Reply #41 on January 28, 2023, 10:51:06 pm by Red wizard »
It's a manager we need to set us up better. We look all over the place at times. What are we working on all week? We need a proven league one league two manager. We have to stop the decline before it's to late or we will be another chesterfield and other side that have dropped like a stone from league one to the national league. Get some belief and confidence in our players and I'm sure most will do well in l2. I look at managers like Paul cook at chessi. How they got him yet we get someone with a handful of games in management or promoted from the youth team. It's not worked and will continue to not work.

donnievic

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 4013
Re: Mitchell
« Reply #42 on January 28, 2023, 11:59:27 pm by donnievic »
Mitchell could have claimed the cross for the first goal but dithered
wow there is blaming a player and then there is just coming out with blaming sumone for sake of it

Watch it back and tell me why you disagree
because if he came he wouldn’t of reached it

Filo

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 31814
Re: Mitchell
« Reply #43 on January 29, 2023, 06:36:12 am by Filo »
Mitchell could have claimed the cross for the first goal but dithered
wow there is blaming a player and then there is just coming out with blaming sumone for sake of it

Watch it back and tell me why you disagree
because if he came he wouldn’t of reached it

I disagree he had plenty of time and space to reach it, unlike the 3rd goal where he came and got nowhere near reaching it

Padge_DRFC

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 5965
Re: Mitchell
« Reply #44 on January 29, 2023, 08:41:35 am by Padge_DRFC »
The frustration with Mitchell. Is at 2v1 we looked like we were going to come back but then he gives them a goal like that and kills everything

steve@dcfd

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 10136
Re: Mitchell
« Reply #45 on January 29, 2023, 09:10:30 am by steve@dcfd »
We need a better keeper now and Mitchell at No 2 Jones can go on loan. He may be cost effective money wise but  he is costing us points the defence have their problems but he is one of them. The third goal was a joke coming off his line again .

donnievic

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 4013
Re: Mitchell
« Reply #46 on January 29, 2023, 09:16:13 am by donnievic »
Mitchell could have claimed the cross for the first goal but dithered
wow there is blaming a player and then there is just coming out with blaming sumone for sake of it

Watch it back and tell me why you disagree
because if he came he wouldn’t of reached it

I disagree he had plenty of time and space to reach it, unlike the 3rd goal where he came and got nowhere near reaching it
I agree on 3rd as if he is coming he has to get there and is caught in no man’s land and can’t even get back unlike not being at fault for orient and Rochdales goals,but fault can also lay with Anderson aswell with it being poor defending by Anderson for letting Akins get into that position from a kick from their keeper

ravenrover

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 11358
Re: Mitchell
« Reply #47 on January 29, 2023, 09:41:40 am by ravenrover »
Not having watched thr highlights my reaction for the 3rd was Mitchel came expecting the ball to be played back to him by whichever CB, when they didn't play it back that left him stranded

Spud

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 2543
Re: Mitchell
« Reply #48 on January 29, 2023, 10:07:10 am by Spud »
Not having watched thr highlights my reaction for the 3rd was Mitchel came expecting the ball to be played back to him by whichever CB, when they didn't play it back that left him stranded

I've just watched em Raven, he shouldn't have been where he was but the defence again got beat by a simple punt upfield by their keeper.
Not sure why I watched tbh, the goals get worse every viewing.

thumper

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 222
Re: Mitchell
« Reply #49 on January 29, 2023, 11:01:40 am by thumper »
We were right back in it at 2-1, 3rd goal defence was all over the place but Mitchell shouldn't have come that far out, no man's land

donnievic

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 4013
Re: Mitchell
« Reply #50 on January 29, 2023, 11:54:07 am by donnievic »
We were right back in it at 2-1, 3rd goal defence was all over the place but Mitchell shouldn't have come that far out, no man's land
no but it wasn’t just Mitchell’s fault,it was a simple punt upfield and just of been dealt with

roversdude

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 14074
Re: Mitchell
« Reply #51 on January 29, 2023, 12:00:38 pm by roversdude »
Can’t really see what Williams did wrong yesterday

Spud

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 2543
Re: Mitchell
« Reply #52 on January 29, 2023, 12:39:18 pm by Spud »
Can’t really see what Williams did wrong yesterday

Not too much, got done too easily for their fourth though, I think it was.

ravenrover

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 11358
Re: Mitchell
« Reply #53 on January 29, 2023, 01:01:29 pm by ravenrover »
Mindst you the time it took for their keeper to finally punt it long should have been an indirect free kick to us. But when was the last time you saw a ref penalise a keeoer for keeping it too long, is 6 seconds still the law?
Done now Filo :-]]
« Last Edit: January 29, 2023, 05:19:27 pm by ravenrover »

Filo

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 31814
Re: Mitchell
« Reply #54 on January 29, 2023, 01:07:32 pm by Filo »
Mindst you the time it took for theur keeoer to finally punt it long shoyld have been an indirect free kick to us. But when was the last time you saw a ref penakise a keeoer for keeping it too long, is 6 seconds still the law?

You on the pop raven? Lol!

roversdude

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 14074
Re: Mitchell
« Reply #55 on January 29, 2023, 01:08:26 pm by roversdude »
RR I have asked that question to the point I googled it and can’t see that it isn’t.
The ref spoke to their keeper early in the game about hurrying up then did nothing about it

drfchound

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 34862
Re: Mitchell
« Reply #56 on January 29, 2023, 01:24:41 pm by drfchound »
There is no way on Earth that the first goal is down to Mitchell.  The cross is delivered in such a way that it would tempt him to think about going for it but realising it is too high and too far away from him, and moving further away from him as well.  You could lay the blame on Seaman who lets their number 16 go past him and hit the ball across goal.
If Mitchell had gone for the cross and not got it he would have been stranded five yards wide of his post and people would have had a go at him for going for a ball he shouldn’t have gone for.

DonnyBazR0ver

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 20025
Re: Mitchell
« Reply #57 on January 29, 2023, 01:39:41 pm by DonnyBazR0ver »
There is no way on Earth that the first goal is down to Mitchell.  The cross is delivered in such a way that it would tempt him to think about going for it but realising it is too high and too far away from him, and moving further away from him as well.  You could lay the blame on Seaman who lets their number 16 go past him and hit the ball across goal.
If Mitchell had gone for the cross and not got it he would have been stranded five yards wide of his post and people would have had a go at him for going for a ball he shouldn’t have gone for.


25 secs on the clock, looping cross swinging away from him, I don't blame him for deciding not to go for it. Trouble was Seaman decided he wanted no part in the action and ran away from the ball.

Yes, he made a poor decision to come out for the third to narrow the angle but suffered one of those "oh sh*t" moments when he realised he'd over committed just asking to be lobbed. I've seen alot worse acts of stupidity.

Just a collective calamity from the defence when the wheels came off.

You wonder about the mental prep being in front of big crowd got got to them.

ravenrover

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 11358
Re: Mitchell
« Reply #58 on January 29, 2023, 03:26:22 pm by ravenrover »
Mindst you the time it took for theur keeoer to finally punt it long shoyld have been an indirect free kick to us. But when was the last time you saw a ref penakise a keeoer for keeping it too long, is 6 seconds still the law?

You on the pop raven? Lol!
Lost me on that one Filo

Filo

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 31814
Re: Mitchell
« Reply #59 on January 29, 2023, 03:33:10 pm by Filo »
Mindst you the time it took for theur keeoer to finally punt it long shoyld have been an indirect free kick to us. But when was the last time you saw a ref penakise a keeoer for keeping it too long, is 6 seconds still the law?

You on the pop raven? Lol!
Lost me on that one Filo

The spelling in that post

 

TinyPortal © 2005-2012