Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
January 24, 2026, 11:28:42 pm

Login with username, password and session length

Links


Join the VSC


FSA logo

Author Topic: Mitchell  (Read 7652 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

mushRTID

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 8277
Mitchell
« on January 28, 2023, 04:27:19 pm by mushRTID »
No comment.



(want to hide these ads? Join the VSC today!)

Chris Black come back

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 16467
Re: Mitchell
« Reply #1 on January 28, 2023, 04:28:41 pm by Chris Black come back »
It’s not much use picking on any single player. The entire defensive unit has been terrible for two seasons now. Not just bad, but excruciatingly embarrassingly bad. All of them, terrible.

ChrisBx

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 1534
Re: Mitchell
« Reply #2 on January 28, 2023, 04:29:51 pm by ChrisBx »
He's not good enough I'm afraid. No idea why GK wasn't a priority in the summer.

since-1969

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 5219
Re: Mitchell
« Reply #3 on January 28, 2023, 04:30:36 pm by since-1969 »
We are very good at making a bad situation worse !!

rich1471

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 3226
Re: Mitchell
« Reply #4 on January 28, 2023, 04:30:42 pm by rich1471 »
Shocking totally his fault

keith79

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 2622
Re: Mitchell
« Reply #5 on January 28, 2023, 04:31:25 pm by keith79 »
It's all down to money.

andyst79

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 1877
Re: Mitchell
« Reply #6 on January 28, 2023, 04:37:55 pm by andyst79 »
It’s not much use picking on any single player. The entire defensive unit has been terrible for two seasons now. Not just bad, but excruciatingly embarrassingly bad. All of them, terrible.

Agree. Anderson let it bounce, Williams was too casual and Mitchell in no man's land. Maxwell is the only 1 I'd be looking at extending his contact

Chris Black come back

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 16467
Re: Mitchell
« Reply #7 on January 28, 2023, 04:40:41 pm by Chris Black come back »
It’s the same scenario most games now. Some piss poor defensive error early doors and then on the backfoot for rest of game. Before probably another defensive failure.

BillyStubbsTears

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 40893
Re: Mitchell
« Reply #8 on January 28, 2023, 04:42:24 pm by BillyStubbsTears »
It was like watching the f**king Marx Brothers trying to defend.

We are excruciatingly embarrassing.

andyst79

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 1877
Re: Mitchell
« Reply #9 on January 28, 2023, 05:00:57 pm by andyst79 »
I'm sorry but I've ran out of patience with Anderson. He's had a bad time with injuries and doesn't help that he's got that shit show Williams at the side of him ( don't get me started on him ffs ) but he's gone at the game. He show's glimpses of his former form but that's about it. Was lucky not to get sent off .As for Nelson , nearly cost us 2 goals with bad passes no better than Faulkner.

BillyStubbsTears

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 40893
Re: Mitchell
« Reply #10 on January 28, 2023, 05:02:39 pm by BillyStubbsTears »
Very lucky not to be sent off. It was a shocking challenge.

bpoolrover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 6202
Re: Mitchell
« Reply #11 on January 28, 2023, 05:03:01 pm by bpoolrover »
That is the worst I have seen Anderson play for us

EasyforDennis

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 2989
Re: Mitchell
« Reply #12 on January 28, 2023, 05:07:27 pm by EasyforDennis »
But we are a sustainable club  :chair: :chair:

vaya

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 3018
Re: Mitchell
« Reply #13 on January 28, 2023, 05:10:10 pm by vaya »
But we are a sustainable club  :chair: :chair:

No one is going to buy a financial basket case of a club.

Move DRFC

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 1195
Re: Mitchell
« Reply #14 on January 28, 2023, 05:16:02 pm by Move DRFC »
Anderson who apparently we want to tie down to a new contract. Seriously, what the hell?? He’s garbage and one of the first names we need to get shot of.

Padge_DRFC

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 5965
Re: Mitchell
« Reply #15 on January 28, 2023, 05:16:42 pm by Padge_DRFC »
Mitchell lobbed again shock horror.

jmt23

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 1973
Re: Mitchell
« Reply #16 on January 28, 2023, 05:17:09 pm by jmt23 »
Also let’s cut the cr.. on Mitchell, he may not be the best keeper we have had, but for this level and above he is more than ok. We have had some very, very good keepers on unsustainable loans!

The goal was not his fault, it was the defenders.

andyst79

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 1877
Re: Mitchell
« Reply #17 on January 28, 2023, 05:26:28 pm by andyst79 »
Also let’s cut the cr.. on Mitchell, he may not be the best keeper we have had, but for this level and above he is more than ok. We have had some very, very good keepers on unsustainable loans!

The goal was not his fault, it was the defenders.
Mitchell gets unfair criticism but was in no man's land for the goal. Anderson and Williams equally at fault. 

Filo

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 31814
Re: Mitchell
« Reply #18 on January 28, 2023, 05:27:29 pm by Filo »
Mitchell could have claimed the cross for the first goal but dithered

EasyforDennis

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 2989
Re: Mitchell
« Reply #19 on January 28, 2023, 05:31:42 pm by EasyforDennis »
Also let’s cut the cr.. on Mitchell, he may not be the best keeper we have had, but for this level and above he is more than ok. We have had some very, very good keepers on unsustainable loans!

The goal was not his fault, it was the defenders.
Mitchell gets unfair criticism but was in no man's land for the goal. Anderson and Williams equally at fault.

But why was he in no man's land? He should have been on his line not coming out for a ball he was never going to get.

mushRTID

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 8277
Re: Mitchell
« Reply #20 on January 28, 2023, 05:31:49 pm by mushRTID »
Let’s be honest he’s awful. Lots on here claim he’s good enough, that’s fine we are all entitled to an opinion.

I don’t see any way he isn’t released in the summer. He’s crap.

NickDRFC

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 7050
Re: Mitchell
« Reply #21 on January 28, 2023, 05:57:35 pm by NickDRFC »
He’s an average (below average) keeper for this league that’s made to look better than he is because we have a piss poor defence that allows him to make a half a dozen (easy) saves a game. He’s not a good enough goalkeeper by any stretch and after he’s finished with us he’ll drift down the leagues.

Pside

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 298
Re: Mitchell
« Reply #22 on January 28, 2023, 06:32:19 pm by Pside »
He needs doing under the trades description act. Absolute fraud

Sammy Chung was King

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 9762
Re: Mitchell
« Reply #23 on January 28, 2023, 06:36:04 pm by Sammy Chung was King »
Anderson should be allowed to leave, over many games he has proven to be a shadow of the player we signed. The goalkeeper has been decent overall but has no pressure on him for his place in the side.

Spud

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 2543
Re: Mitchell
« Reply #24 on January 28, 2023, 06:40:35 pm by Spud »
After that shitshow you blame Mitchell lol.
You don't rate him Mush, we get it.

elmsallrover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 1222
Re: Mitchell
« Reply #25 on January 28, 2023, 06:41:56 pm by elmsallrover »
Also let’s cut the cr.. on Mitchell, he may not be the best keeper we have had, but for this level and above he is more than ok. We have had some very, very good keepers on unsustainable loans!

The goal was not his fault, it was the defenders.
more like he's OK for the money which is what gm said when he signed him

dickos1

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 17857
Re: Mitchell
« Reply #26 on January 28, 2023, 07:15:46 pm by dickos1 »
May have been his fault for the goal but his save was unbelievable in the first half

Canadian Rover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 2168
Re: Mitchell
« Reply #27 on January 28, 2023, 07:16:27 pm by Canadian Rover »
Also let’s cut the cr.. on Mitchell, he may not be the best keeper we have had, but for this level and above he is more than ok. We have had some very, very good keepers on unsustainable loans!

The goal was not his fault, it was the defenders.
more like he's OK for the money which is what gm said when he signed him

We get what we pay for.

silent majority

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 17183
Re: Mitchell
« Reply #28 on January 28, 2023, 07:17:48 pm by silent majority »
Also let’s cut the cr.. on Mitchell, he may not be the best keeper we have had, but for this level and above he is more than ok. We have had some very, very good keepers on unsustainable loans!

The goal was not his fault, it was the defenders.
more like he's OK for the money which is what gm said when he signed him

That's not quite what he said. GM was talking about getting value for money when adding to the squad and suggested that the money would be better invested in other areas and didn't feel spending money on a keeper was a priority.

coventryrover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 2217
Re: Mitchell
« Reply #29 on January 28, 2023, 07:50:16 pm by coventryrover »
It was thenpin to deflate the balloon moment.   We were bloody great atbthebstart of that second half.    The manager really needs to rething just having George up front running everywhere.   How can he be effective doing that

 

TinyPortal © 2005-2012