Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
December 21, 2025, 04:20:36 am

Login with username, password and session length

Links


Join the VSC


FSA logo

Author Topic: Carlisle  (Read 3174 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

roversdude

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 14005
Carlisle
« on May 20, 2023, 05:49:17 pm by roversdude »
Congratulations to them probably best team I saw this season
Poor old Bradford I’m sure Hughes will have someone to blame



(want to hide these ads? Join the VSC today!)

Thorney

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 1242
Re: Carlisle
« Reply #1 on May 20, 2023, 06:02:22 pm by Thorney »
Congratulations to them probably best team I saw this season
Poor old Bradford I’m sure Hughes will have someone to blame

And it was probably the best I seen us play this season when we beat them on new-year day.

How different our paths went after that day

roversdude

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 14005
Re: Carlisle
« Reply #2 on May 20, 2023, 06:08:35 pm by roversdude »
Never a truer word Thorney

Thorney

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 1242
Re: Carlisle
« Reply #3 on May 20, 2023, 08:23:17 pm by Thorney »
Should of been the catalyst for us to kick on, and it should of showed the manager that we could actually play a bit if allowed ro get the ball forward quicker, but no he wouldn't let that happen.
At one point I thought it was like watching barasi bringing the ball out of defence and not ro-shaun

EasyforDennis

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 2960
Re: Carlisle
« Reply #4 on May 20, 2023, 09:10:30 pm by EasyforDennis »
I see Brad Halliday set Carlisle on their way with an og.

mushRTID

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 8215
Re: Carlisle
« Reply #5 on May 20, 2023, 09:13:52 pm by mushRTID »
Just seen a comment on Twitter from a Bradford.m fan about Clayton;

“Too slow and can’t run”

We tried to tell you!’

GazLaz

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 14866
Re: Carlisle
« Reply #6 on May 20, 2023, 10:29:59 pm by GazLaz »
Just seen a comment on Twitter from a Bradford.m fan about Clayton;

“Too slow and can’t run”

We tried to tell you!’

He’s been ok for them as he was ok for us.

roversdude

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 14005
Re: Carlisle
« Reply #7 on May 20, 2023, 10:41:31 pm by roversdude »
Bradford fan who works for me says Clayton has been outstanding for them

Prez

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 1763
Re: Carlisle
« Reply #8 on May 20, 2023, 10:47:55 pm by Prez »
I actually thought they were one of the worst teams to visit the eco power this season. Can’t believe how much space they gave us

mushRTID

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 8215
Re: Carlisle
« Reply #9 on May 21, 2023, 12:36:06 am by mushRTID »
Just seen a comment on Twitter from a Bradford.m fan about Clayton;

“Too slow and can’t run”

We tried to tell you!’

He’s been ok for them as he was ok for us.

I’m aware he has done ok for them.
This doesn’t change my opinion he’s slow and cant run and that the Bradford fan I’m referring to mentioned this too.

bobbymax

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 2450
Re: Carlisle
« Reply #10 on May 21, 2023, 08:40:54 am by bobbymax »
Promotion was a must for Bradford this season. Not difficult to see it all falling apart very quickly.

idler

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 11493
Re: Carlisle
« Reply #11 on May 21, 2023, 09:02:19 am by idler »
Just seen a comment on Twitter from a Bradford.m fan about Clayton;

“Too slow and can’t run”

We tried to tell you!’

He’s been ok for them as he was ok for us.

I’m aware he has done ok for them.
This doesn’t change my opinion he’s slow and cant run and that the Bradford fan I’m referring to mentioned this too.

The idea in the Bradford team was that other players had the legs and he sat deep and used the ball.
It worked in most games and he fitted in well.

Bessie Red

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 2668
Re: Carlisle
« Reply #12 on May 21, 2023, 02:16:44 pm by Bessie Red »
Carlisle are the best of the 4 play off teams. I hope they (& think they will) beat Stockport.

ncRover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 5423
Re: Carlisle
« Reply #13 on May 21, 2023, 02:27:23 pm by ncRover »
Just seen a comment on Twitter from a Bradford.m fan about Clayton;

“Too slow and can’t run”

We tried to tell you!’

He’s been ok for them as he was ok for us.

I’m aware he has done ok for them.
This doesn’t change my opinion he’s slow and cant run and that the Bradford fan I’m referring to mentioned this too.

Bradford and Mark Hughes are a step behind us and many others now in thinking you can get away with having a slow and leggy midfield in this league.

BillyStubbsTears

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 40689
Re: Carlisle
« Reply #14 on May 21, 2023, 02:34:39 pm by BillyStubbsTears »
Just seen a comment on Twitter from a Bradford.m fan about Clayton;

“Too slow and can’t run”

We tried to tell you!’

He’s been ok for them as he was ok for us.

I’m aware he has done ok for them.
This doesn’t change my opinion he’s slow and cant run and that the Bradford fan I’m referring to mentioned this too.

The idea in the Bradford team was that other players had the legs and he sat deep and used the ball.
It worked in most games and he fitted in well.

I can see he would control matches if the rest of the side is set up to protect him and give him space.

It worked for about 4 matches for us this season. Then the opposition realised that if you play an aggressive press, he didn't have the physical reaction time to play how he wanted and he was overwhelmed.

And with him playing as the deepest midfielder, god help us if we lost possession high up the field and the opposing team broke quickly. His only response was a foul and a booking because he was three yards slower than a breaking midfielder/striker.

ncRover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 5423
Re: Carlisle
« Reply #15 on May 21, 2023, 02:48:03 pm by ncRover »
Just seen a comment on Twitter from a Bradford.m fan about Clayton;

“Too slow and can’t run”

We tried to tell you!’

He’s been ok for them as he was ok for us.

I’m aware he has done ok for them.
This doesn’t change my opinion he’s slow and cant run and that the Bradford fan I’m referring to mentioned this too.

The idea in the Bradford team was that other players had the legs and he sat deep and used the ball.
It worked in most games and he fitted in well.

I can see he would control matches if the rest of the side is set up to protect him and give him space.

It worked for about 4 matches for us this season. Then the opposition realised that if you play an aggressive press, he didn't have the physical reaction time to play how he wanted and he was overwhelmed.

And with him playing as the deepest midfielder, god help us if we lost possession high up the field and the opposing team broke quickly. His only response was a foul and a booking because he was three yards slower than a breaking midfielder/striker.

Bang on Billy. Good guy and obviously a much better player in his prime but he looked ready to retire to me.

Idler they do have options with more legs but played him with Smallwood, another ageing midfielder. A club with those resources should be blowing the league away.
« Last Edit: May 21, 2023, 02:51:20 pm by ncRover »

Jonathan

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 4869
Re: Carlisle
« Reply #16 on May 21, 2023, 03:03:00 pm by Jonathan »
Clayton’s flaws are obvious given his age / previous wear and tear. However we’re a more solid and effective team with him in it than we were without him. Offloading him was fine if we’d had a more dynamic midfielder to come in and replace him. However we didn’t, so we ended up missing his leadership and experience.

BillyStubbsTears

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 40689
Re: Carlisle
« Reply #17 on May 21, 2023, 03:21:05 pm by BillyStubbsTears »
We did have a more dynamic midfielder who replaced him.

Lakin.

He ended up having to play out of position because of injuries and loss of form from other players, then got a season-ender himself.

Admittedly there was a gap between losing one and signing the other.
« Last Edit: May 21, 2023, 03:24:08 pm by BillyStubbsTears »

roversdude

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 14005
Re: Carlisle
« Reply #18 on May 21, 2023, 03:29:51 pm by roversdude »
If Clayton got booked early on as BST alluded to he was basically a passenger anyway

pib

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 3634
Re: Carlisle
« Reply #19 on May 22, 2023, 10:24:56 am by pib »
If Carlisle win the final it's going to make it an even tougher division than it is already next season.

Nothing against Carlisle as they're a good side and Simpson has done a great job, but I'd back Stockport to go again and strengthen next year with the financial backing they've got. Carlisle could go either way if they stay down.

You'd expect Bradford to be up there again, along with Wrexham, Notts Co., MK D*ns, and possibly Mansfield, Salford, Gillingham.

roversdude

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 14005
Re: Carlisle
« Reply #20 on May 22, 2023, 10:29:26 am by roversdude »
Whoever is in our league I fancy our chances much more than I did whilst watching theWalsall game

big fat yorkshire pudding

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 14498
Re: Carlisle
« Reply #21 on May 22, 2023, 10:36:33 am by big fat yorkshire pudding »
Bradford like many teams in this league were bang average last year footballing wise but they did have a stable, strong core who physically were stronger than us.  We combatted that well under Mcsheffrey in very difficult circumstances and us fans loved it.  Under Schofield we were soft and collapsed easily.

Look at those sides that made the top 7, physical, solid and not particularly spectacular.  As we saw under Ferguson, get a half decent side together and you can get promotion quite comfortably.  That has to be the aim this year.

DMnumber4

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 1277
Re: Carlisle
« Reply #22 on May 22, 2023, 02:24:25 pm by DMnumber4 »
If Clayton got booked early on as BST alluded to he was basically a passenger anyway

Got booked v Rovers after 11 minutes and still ran the game...

roversdude

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 14005
Re: Carlisle
« Reply #23 on May 22, 2023, 02:38:09 pm by roversdude »
Could have gone straight off and still run the show against us last season TBF

 

TinyPortal © 2005-2012