0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I'll give you my two pennirth. There's an overwhelming reason to believe that Johnson wasn't faking it. It's called "Dominic Cummings"Cummings was Johnson's right hand man at the time. It is inconceivable that he wouldn't have known if the illness was a scam. Since he was booted out, Cummings has thrown everything he has at Johnson. It's been brutal. But he still holds to the line that Johnson was very seriously ill. That makes it very, very likely that Johnson's illness was genuine.
Quote from: BillyStubbsTears on November 02, 2023, 06:50:19 pmI'll give you my two pennirth. There's an overwhelming reason to believe that Johnson wasn't faking it. It's called "Dominic Cummings"Cummings was Johnson's right hand man at the time. It is inconceivable that he wouldn't have known if the illness was a scam. Since he was booted out, Cummings has thrown everything he has at Johnson. It's been brutal. But he still holds to the line that Johnson was very seriously ill. That makes it very, very likely that Johnson's illness was genuine.That's a decent argument but the fact that we're even having the discussion about whether the Prime Minister of the UK pretended to have a life-threatening illness as a PR stunt shows what a pitiful state the government of our country is in.
I'll give you my two pennirth. There's an overwhelming reason to believe that Johnson wasn't faking it. It's called "Dominic Cummings"Cummings was Johnson's right hand man at the time. It is inconceivable that he wouldn't have known if the illness was a scam. Since he was booted out, Cummings has thrown everything he has at Johnson. It's been brutal. But he still holds to the line that Johnson was very seriously ill. That makes it very, very likely that Johnson's illness was genuine.
No one spends one night in intensive care, and no one gets discharged a couple of days later
That, Nudga, is just about the best one liner in a decade. You've both made me smile and voiced a veritable truth in the space of 8 pungent words.Cracking!BobG
To think. This woman used to be the Political Editor of the BBC.https://twitter.com/Zero_4/status/1720230694897488124Here she is today, uncritically repeating one of THE most egregious lies that Johnson regularly pushed.She is an utter disgrace to the profession. Either deliberately deceiving, or too thick to realise how thick she is.
It appears that anyone with a modicum of common sense was in the same boat. I didn't believe it for a second.
Quote from: BillyStubbsTears on November 03, 2023, 06:16:16 pmTo think. This woman used to be the Political Editor of the BBC.https://twitter.com/Zero_4/status/1720230694897488124Here she is today, uncritically repeating one of THE most egregious lies that Johnson regularly pushed.She is an utter disgrace to the profession. Either deliberately deceiving, or too thick to realise how thick she is.A respected, experienced, professional journalist; thick?You really do need to sort out your descriptive narratives, BST, because that one is just bordering on silliness.
BillySee below extract from www.france24.com/en/europe/20210206-how-the-eu-s-covid-19-vaccine-rollout-became-an-advert-for-brexitPlease point out which bit is outrageous or false"Brussels took charge of vaccine procurement in the summer of 2020, as part of what Von der Leyen called a “European Health Union” in her September “State of the Union” address.Member states were free to opt out of this supranational scheme, but none did so. Brexit made it “easy” for the UK to go its own way on vaccines, Bouzoua [political scientist at Washington DC’s Hudson Institute and former Portuguese Europe minister] observed.“The EU Commission is very good at negotiating things like trade deals, but traditionally it hasn’t had competence in such matters as vaccines and contract negotiations, which were left to member states,” Wooldridge [political editor of The Economist] pointed out.“The commission decided to aggrandise its competence and it wasn’t up to the job – it didn’t have the right people or the right skills,” he continued.By contrast, Britain put a successful venture capitalist specialising in biosciences, Kate Bingham, in charge of its vaccine procurement programme."
Quote from: Mike_F on November 03, 2023, 10:57:44 amQuote from: BillyStubbsTears on November 02, 2023, 06:50:19 pmI'll give you my two pennirth. There's an overwhelming reason to believe that Johnson wasn't faking it. It's called "Dominic Cummings"Cummings was Johnson's right hand man at the time. It is inconceivable that he wouldn't have known if the illness was a scam. Since he was booted out, Cummings has thrown everything he has at Johnson. It's been brutal. But he still holds to the line that Johnson was very seriously ill. That makes it very, very likely that Johnson's illness was genuine.That's a decent argument but the fact that we're even having the discussion about whether the Prime Minister of the UK pretended to have a life-threatening illness as a PR stunt shows what a pitiful state the government of our country is in.Couldn't agree more. Johnson should never have got within a million miles of No 10.
Quote from: BillyStubbsTears on November 02, 2023, 06:50:19 pmI'll give you my two pennirth. There's an overwhelming reason to believe that Johnson wasn't faking it. It's called "Dominic Cummings"Cummings was Johnson's right hand man at the time. It is inconceivable that he wouldn't have known if the illness was a scam. Since he was booted out, Cummings has thrown everything he has at Johnson. It's been brutal. But he still holds to the line that Johnson was very seriously ill. That makes it very, very likely that Johnson's illness was genuine.That's a decent argument but the fact that we're even having the discussion about whether the Prime Minister of the UK pretended to have a life-threatening illness as a PR stunt shows what a pitiful state the government of our country is in.
I'll give you my two pennirth. There's an overwhelming reason to believe that Johnson wasn't faking it. It's called "Dominic Cummings"Cummings was Johnson's right hand man at the time. It is inconceivable that he wouldn't have known if the illness was a scam. Since he was booted out, Cummings has thrown everything he has at Johnson. It's been brutal. But he still holds to the line that Johnson was very seriously ill. That makes it very, very likely that Johnson's illness was genuine.
BillyWith genuine respect you're conflating two separate issues: The procurement of vaccines (an EU competency); and The administration of the vaccine rollout (a member state competency).The UK were fast out of the blocks in vaccinating as the UK was significantly more successful in it's procurement program than the EU.Meaning we crucially vaccinated the elderly and vulnerable much earlier. Thanks to Brexit and not participating in the EU procurement scheme. Which we beyond reasonable doubt would have done if still in the EU.Once the supply issues in the EU were overcome several EU countries administered their vaccine program more efficiently than the UK. This meant by mid/late 2021 they had overtaken the UK and vaccinated fit and healthy 20 and 30 somethings sooner. This has nothing to do with Brexit.On deaths we need to compare statistics by country pre and post vaccine to identify the relevant successes of each countries vaccine program. Looking at total deaths, as you have done, brings in many other variables: ageing of population, obesity levels, population density, Government attitude to lockdown/controls (not an EU competency), societal attitudes to controls, method of recording Covid deaths esp re co-morbidity, levels of testing etc etcSo Covid Year 1 deaths y/e 28/2/21 vs Covid Year 2 deaths y/e 28/2/22. www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/#countriesUK - Year1: 147,340 deaths; Year 2: 40,199. Fall of 73%France - Year 1: 85,414; Year 2: 52,721. Fall of 38%Germany - Year 1: 70,675; Year 2: 52,653. Fall of 26%Italy - Year 1: 97,338; Year 2: 57,222. Fall of 41%Spain - Year 1: 69,142; Year 2: 30,504. Fall of 56%.Pretty stark. Why did deaths in the UK fall so much more significantly between these periods?Simple. By the end of February 2021 a significant proportion of the most likely people to die from Covid had been fully or partially vaccinated. This was not the case in the EU.Why? Because the EU ballsed up their vaccination procurement program. Whilst on that score the UK did well.How many lives did this save? Applying the average % fall of the EU countries above to the UK's Year 1 stats - approximately 48,000 lives.48,000 lives.There's a Brexit benefit for you right there.Res ipsa loquitur