Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
January 25, 2025, 09:25:12 am

Login with username, password and session length

Links


FSA logo

Author Topic: McGrath  (Read 21864 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

NickDRFC

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 6595
Re: McGrath
« Reply #90 on January 06, 2024, 10:53:30 am by NickDRFC »
I’d say the club’s ’recruitment system’ has quite a task on its hands, due to limited finances.

We seem to be working with one hand tied behind our backs, constantly. Trying to find good quality, robust players for next to nothing must be a bit of a headache, at times.

You could say the same about most clubs in League One & League Two. Our recruitment (amongst other things) has seen us tumble from League One play-off hopefuls to bottom half League Two in the space of two and a half years, it’s very difficult to argue that it hasn’t been shambolic in that period. The recruitment of the summer has shown more positive signs but if that’s solely down to McCann then there are still structural improvements that we need to make to ensure it doesn’t return to the shambles of before when he leaves (and these may already be in place, or being set up).



(want to hide these ads? Join the VSC today!)

DonnyBazR0ver

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 18839
Re: McGrath
« Reply #91 on January 06, 2024, 12:10:12 pm by DonnyBazR0ver »
Does he se McGrath and Bailey as the first choice pair then? That means Bobby is well down the pecking order. Do we need 6 centre halves!?

Do you mean we shouldn’t have signed McGrath GazLaz?
Have we made another mistake?



If he’s better than what we already have, yes we should have signed him. If not, we shouldn’t! Is there a plan to get rid of some of the other lads? Wood, Anderson, Olowu, Bobby, Bailey, Long, McGrath, that’s actually 7 sorry. No man on the planet can tell me the team 19th in the 4th division should have 7 centre halves on the payroll. Does that scream good recruitment/ planning to you? Screams one guess after another to me.

Grant must think that a fair few of the lads aren’t good enough even though Wood, Anderson, Olowu and Bailey have been given contracts in the last 12months ish and Long and Bobby within the last 18 months.

It’s impossible to be confident with any signing we make of this ilk. “Trust Grant” will be the cry, and he did bring in some good players in his previous stint, but for every Sadlier, Herbie Kane and Wilks there was a Paul Taylor, Shaun Cummings and Rian McLean.

McCann hasn’t signed the 7 centre halves though, he’s maybe signed 2 of them. So if you were manager and had the opportunity to bring in players you thought were better would you say, oh no I can’t do that as I already have 6 centre halves who are shite that the last manager signed.

And every manager on the planet makes good and bad signings, so yes of course he made bad signings even the best managers on the planet do that.


No he hasn’t signed them all but it’s certainly not a positive sign for the clubs recruitment system when you have to say “we’ve got 6 centre halves, 5 arent good enough, let’s sign another”. 

You're missing the context of how we've ended up in this position.

Looking at who signed, when and by whom, considering the injuries we had at the time, it's not difficult to understand there's some mitigating circumstances.

BillyStubbsTears

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 38872
Re: McGrath
« Reply #92 on January 06, 2024, 03:21:02 pm by BillyStubbsTears »
When the best defender at the club is a midfielder, some really pointed questions need to be asked about our recruitment strategy.

dickos1

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 17361
Re: McGrath
« Reply #93 on January 06, 2024, 03:24:49 pm by dickos1 »
Does he se McGrath and Bailey as the first choice pair then? That means Bobby is well down the pecking order. Do we need 6 centre halves!?

Do you mean we shouldn’t have signed McGrath GazLaz?
Have we made another mistake?



If he’s better than what we already have, yes we should have signed him. If not, we shouldn’t! Is there a plan to get rid of some of the other lads? Wood, Anderson, Olowu, Bobby, Bailey, Long, McGrath, that’s actually 7 sorry. No man on the planet can tell me the team 19th in the 4th division should have 7 centre halves on the payroll. Does that scream good recruitment/ planning to you? Screams one guess after another to me.

Grant must think that a fair few of the lads aren’t good enough even though Wood, Anderson, Olowu and Bailey have been given contracts in the last 12months ish and Long and Bobby within the last 18 months.

It’s impossible to be confident with any signing we make of this ilk. “Trust Grant” will be the cry, and he did bring in some good players in his previous stint, but for every Sadlier, Herbie Kane and Wilks there was a Paul Taylor, Shaun Cummings and Rian McLean.

McCann hasn’t signed the 7 centre halves though, he’s maybe signed 2 of them. So if you were manager and had the opportunity to bring in players you thought were better would you say, oh no I can’t do that as I already have 6 centre halves who are shite that the last manager signed.

And every manager on the planet makes good and bad signings, so yes of course he made bad signings even the best managers on the planet do that.


No he hasn’t signed them all but it’s certainly not a positive sign for the clubs recruitment system when you have to say “we’ve got 6 centre halves, 5 arent good enough, let’s sign another”. 

I agree
We’ve made some dreadful signings, mainly when we were shopping with no cash.
Now we’ve got some cash I don’t think it’s unreasonable to replace the poor signings we made earlier.
It’s certainly not McCanns fault, and if you or I were him you’d be doing exactly the same if you were able to do so

GazLaz

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 13404
Re: McGrath
« Reply #94 on January 06, 2024, 05:57:12 pm by GazLaz »
Does he se McGrath and Bailey as the first choice pair then? That means Bobby is well down the pecking order. Do we need 6 centre halves!?

Do you mean we shouldn’t have signed McGrath GazLaz?
Have we made another mistake?



If he’s better than what we already have, yes we should have signed him. If not, we shouldn’t! Is there a plan to get rid of some of the other lads? Wood, Anderson, Olowu, Bobby, Bailey, Long, McGrath, that’s actually 7 sorry. No man on the planet can tell me the team 19th in the 4th division should have 7 centre halves on the payroll. Does that scream good recruitment/ planning to you? Screams one guess after another to me.

Grant must think that a fair few of the lads aren’t good enough even though Wood, Anderson, Olowu and Bailey have been given contracts in the last 12months ish and Long and Bobby within the last 18 months.

It’s impossible to be confident with any signing we make of this ilk. “Trust Grant” will be the cry, and he did bring in some good players in his previous stint, but for every Sadlier, Herbie Kane and Wilks there was a Paul Taylor, Shaun Cummings and Rian McLean.

McCann hasn’t signed the 7 centre halves though, he’s maybe signed 2 of them. So if you were manager and had the opportunity to bring in players you thought were better would you say, oh no I can’t do that as I already have 6 centre halves who are shite that the last manager signed.

And every manager on the planet makes good and bad signings, so yes of course he made bad signings even the best managers on the planet do that.


No he hasn’t signed them all but it’s certainly not a positive sign for the clubs recruitment system when you have to say “we’ve got 6 centre halves, 5 arent good enough, let’s sign another”. 

I agree
We’ve made some dreadful signings, mainly when we were shopping with no cash.
Now we’ve got some cash I don’t think it’s unreasonable to replace the poor signings we made earlier.
It’s certainly not McCanns fault, and if you or I were him you’d be doing exactly the same if you were able to do so

McGrath doesn’t look like the signing of a team with cash.

dickos1

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 17361
Re: McGrath
« Reply #95 on January 06, 2024, 06:02:42 pm by dickos1 »
Does he se McGrath and Bailey as the first choice pair then? That means Bobby is well down the pecking order. Do we need 6 centre halves!?

Do you mean we shouldn’t have signed McGrath GazLaz?
Have we made another mistake?



If he’s better than what we already have, yes we should have signed him. If not, we shouldn’t! Is there a plan to get rid of some of the other lads? Wood, Anderson, Olowu, Bobby, Bailey, Long, McGrath, that’s actually 7 sorry. No man on the planet can tell me the team 19th in the 4th division should have 7 centre halves on the payroll. Does that scream good recruitment/ planning to you? Screams one guess after another to me.

Grant must think that a fair few of the lads aren’t good enough even though Wood, Anderson, Olowu and Bailey have been given contracts in the last 12months ish and Long and Bobby within the last 18 months.

It’s impossible to be confident with any signing we make of this ilk. “Trust Grant” will be the cry, and he did bring in some good players in his previous stint, but for every Sadlier, Herbie Kane and Wilks there was a Paul Taylor, Shaun Cummings and Rian McLean.

McCann hasn’t signed the 7 centre halves though, he’s maybe signed 2 of them. So if you were manager and had the opportunity to bring in players you thought were better would you say, oh no I can’t do that as I already have 6 centre halves who are shite that the last manager signed.

And every manager on the planet makes good and bad signings, so yes of course he made bad signings even the best managers on the planet do that.


No he hasn’t signed them all but it’s certainly not a positive sign for the clubs recruitment system when you have to say “we’ve got 6 centre halves, 5 arent good enough, let’s sign another”. 

I agree
We’ve made some dreadful signings, mainly when we were shopping with no cash.
Now we’ve got some cash I don’t think it’s unreasonable to replace the poor signings we made earlier.
It’s certainly not McCanns fault, and if you or I were him you’d be doing exactly the same if you were able to do so

McGrath doesn’t look like the signing of a team with cash.

Does it not?

GazLaz

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 13404
Re: McGrath
« Reply #96 on January 06, 2024, 06:04:22 pm by GazLaz »
Does he se McGrath and Bailey as the first choice pair then? That means Bobby is well down the pecking order. Do we need 6 centre halves!?

Do you mean we shouldn’t have signed McGrath GazLaz?
Have we made another mistake?



If he’s better than what we already have, yes we should have signed him. If not, we shouldn’t! Is there a plan to get rid of some of the other lads? Wood, Anderson, Olowu, Bobby, Bailey, Long, McGrath, that’s actually 7 sorry. No man on the planet can tell me the team 19th in the 4th division should have 7 centre halves on the payroll. Does that scream good recruitment/ planning to you? Screams one guess after another to me.

Grant must think that a fair few of the lads aren’t good enough even though Wood, Anderson, Olowu and Bailey have been given contracts in the last 12months ish and Long and Bobby within the last 18 months.

It’s impossible to be confident with any signing we make of this ilk. “Trust Grant” will be the cry, and he did bring in some good players in his previous stint, but for every Sadlier, Herbie Kane and Wilks there was a Paul Taylor, Shaun Cummings and Rian McLean.

McCann hasn’t signed the 7 centre halves though, he’s maybe signed 2 of them. So if you were manager and had the opportunity to bring in players you thought were better would you say, oh no I can’t do that as I already have 6 centre halves who are shite that the last manager signed.

And every manager on the planet makes good and bad signings, so yes of course he made bad signings even the best managers on the planet do that.


No he hasn’t signed them all but it’s certainly not a positive sign for the clubs recruitment system when you have to say “we’ve got 6 centre halves, 5 arent good enough, let’s sign another”. 

I agree
We’ve made some dreadful signings, mainly when we were shopping with no cash.
Now we’ve got some cash I don’t think it’s unreasonable to replace the poor signings we made earlier.
It’s certainly not McCanns fault, and if you or I were him you’d be doing exactly the same if you were able to do so

McGrath doesn’t look like the signing of a team with cash.

Does it not?

No, he will be on below average for a L2 centre half.

dickos1

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 17361
Re: McGrath
« Reply #97 on January 06, 2024, 06:10:13 pm by dickos1 »
If you have cash you can still sign players who are good that don’t cost a fortune.

wilts rover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 10321
Re: McGrath
« Reply #98 on January 06, 2024, 06:18:03 pm by wilts rover »
Does he se McGrath and Bailey as the first choice pair then? That means Bobby is well down the pecking order. Do we need 6 centre halves!?

Do you mean we shouldn’t have signed McGrath GazLaz?
Have we made another mistake?



If he’s better than what we already have, yes we should have signed him. If not, we shouldn’t! Is there a plan to get rid of some of the other lads? Wood, Anderson, Olowu, Bobby, Bailey, Long, McGrath, that’s actually 7 sorry. No man on the planet can tell me the team 19th in the 4th division should have 7 centre halves on the payroll. Does that scream good recruitment/ planning to you? Screams one guess after another to me.

Grant must think that a fair few of the lads aren’t good enough even though Wood, Anderson, Olowu and Bailey have been given contracts in the last 12months ish and Long and Bobby within the last 18 months.

It’s impossible to be confident with any signing we make of this ilk. “Trust Grant” will be the cry, and he did bring in some good players in his previous stint, but for every Sadlier, Herbie Kane and Wilks there was a Paul Taylor, Shaun Cummings and Rian McLean.

McCann hasn’t signed the 7 centre halves though, he’s maybe signed 2 of them. So if you were manager and had the opportunity to bring in players you thought were better would you say, oh no I can’t do that as I already have 6 centre halves who are shite that the last manager signed.

And every manager on the planet makes good and bad signings, so yes of course he made bad signings even the best managers on the planet do that.


No he hasn’t signed them all but it’s certainly not a positive sign for the clubs recruitment system when you have to say “we’ve got 6 centre halves, 5 arent good enough, let’s sign another”. 

I agree
We’ve made some dreadful signings, mainly when we were shopping with no cash.
Now we’ve got some cash I don’t think it’s unreasonable to replace the poor signings we made earlier.
It’s certainly not McCanns fault, and if you or I were him you’d be doing exactly the same if you were able to do so

McGrath doesn’t look like the signing of a team with cash.

So when McCann said that the board had given him money to get the players he wanted was he lying? Or a bad judge of player? Or so poor a manager he can't see what we need?

https://www.drfc-vsc.co.uk/index.php?topic=289718.msg1279816#msg1279816

ncRover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 4474
Re: McGrath
« Reply #99 on January 06, 2024, 06:44:59 pm by ncRover »
Does he se McGrath and Bailey as the first choice pair then? That means Bobby is well down the pecking order. Do we need 6 centre halves!?

Do you mean we shouldn’t have signed McGrath GazLaz?
Have we made another mistake?



If he’s better than what we already have, yes we should have signed him. If not, we shouldn’t! Is there a plan to get rid of some of the other lads? Wood, Anderson, Olowu, Bobby, Bailey, Long, McGrath, that’s actually 7 sorry. No man on the planet can tell me the team 19th in the 4th division should have 7 centre halves on the payroll. Does that scream good recruitment/ planning to you? Screams one guess after another to me.

Grant must think that a fair few of the lads aren’t good enough even though Wood, Anderson, Olowu and Bailey have been given contracts in the last 12months ish and Long and Bobby within the last 18 months.

It’s impossible to be confident with any signing we make of this ilk. “Trust Grant” will be the cry, and he did bring in some good players in his previous stint, but for every Sadlier, Herbie Kane and Wilks there was a Paul Taylor, Shaun Cummings and Rian McLean.

McCann hasn’t signed the 7 centre halves though, he’s maybe signed 2 of them. So if you were manager and had the opportunity to bring in players you thought were better would you say, oh no I can’t do that as I already have 6 centre halves who are shite that the last manager signed.

And every manager on the planet makes good and bad signings, so yes of course he made bad signings even the best managers on the planet do that.


No he hasn’t signed them all but it’s certainly not a positive sign for the clubs recruitment system when you have to say “we’ve got 6 centre halves, 5 arent good enough, let’s sign another”. 

I agree
We’ve made some dreadful signings, mainly when we were shopping with no cash.
Now we’ve got some cash I don’t think it’s unreasonable to replace the poor signings we made earlier.
It’s certainly not McCanns fault, and if you or I were him you’d be doing exactly the same if you were able to do so

McGrath doesn’t look like the signing of a team with cash.

Does it not?

No, he will be on below average for a L2 centre half.

He’s 20?

In the box

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 540
Re: McGrath
« Reply #100 on January 06, 2024, 06:46:14 pm by In the box »
Does he se McGrath and Bailey as the first choice pair then? That means Bobby is well down the pecking order. Do we need 6 centre halves!?

Do you mean we shouldn’t have signed McGrath GazLaz?
Have we made another mistake?



If he’s better than what we already have, yes we should have signed him. If not, we shouldn’t! Is there a plan to get rid of some of the other lads? Wood, Anderson, Olowu, Bobby, Bailey, Long, McGrath, that’s actually 7 sorry. No man on the planet can tell me the team 19th in the 4th division should have 7 centre halves on the payroll. Does that scream good recruitment/ planning to you? Screams one guess after another to me.

Grant must think that a fair few of the lads aren’t good enough even though Wood, Anderson, Olowu and Bailey have been given contracts in the last 12months ish and Long and Bobby within the last 18 months.

It’s impossible to be confident with any signing we make of this ilk. “Trust Grant” will be the cry, and he did bring in some good players in his previous stint, but for every Sadlier, Herbie Kane and Wilks there was a Paul Taylor, Shaun Cummings and Rian McLean.

McCann hasn’t signed the 7 centre halves though, he’s maybe signed 2 of them. So if you were manager and had the opportunity to bring in players you thought were better would you say, oh no I can’t do that as I already have 6 centre halves who are shite that the last manager signed.

And every manager on the planet makes good and bad signings, so yes of course he made bad signings even the best managers on the planet do that.


No he hasn’t signed them all but it’s certainly not a positive sign for the clubs recruitment system when you have to say “we’ve got 6 centre halves, 5 arent good enough, let’s sign another”. 

I agree
We’ve made some dreadful signings, mainly when we were shopping with no cash.
Now we’ve got some cash I don’t think it’s unreasonable to replace the poor signings we made earlier.
It’s certainly not McCanns fault, and if you or I were him you’d be doing exactly the same if you were able to do so

McGrath doesn’t look like the signing of a team with cash.

So when McCann said that the board had given him money to get the players he wanted was he lying? Or a bad judge of player? Or so poor a manager he can't see what we need?

https://www.drfc-vsc.co.uk/index.php?topic=289718.msg1279816#msg1279816
He was using his head and not doing a Ferguson by publicly criticising what he has available. But I very much doubt they the budged had changed by much if at all .

dickos1

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 17361
Re: McGrath
« Reply #101 on January 06, 2024, 06:52:11 pm by dickos1 »
Our wage bill must be amongst the biggest in the league. Purely on numbers, our squad is massive.
The budget isn’t the problem it’s how it’s been spent over last 3 years

StocksArmy

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 1859
Re: McGrath
« Reply #102 on January 06, 2024, 07:01:05 pm by StocksArmy »
If the club wanted to turn the season around and I mean REALLY wanted to turn the season around in this window they would.

knockers

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 1902
Re: McGrath
« Reply #103 on January 06, 2024, 07:06:51 pm by knockers »
The best thing to spend any money on in this window is to pay off the ten players that he’s never going to pick to play.
 Let’s start next year with a squad that he actually wants.

ncRover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 4474
Re: McGrath
« Reply #104 on January 06, 2024, 07:40:49 pm by ncRover »
Our wage bill must be amongst the biggest in the league. Purely on numbers, our squad is massive.
The budget isn’t the problem it’s how it’s been spent over last 3 years

The budget is good this season with the size of the squad and the signings made.

But last year and especially that Wellens / McSheffrey L1 relegation squad, the budget will have been pitiful.

This team is average this year, but it would easily still beat that season’s team in a game.

dickos1

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 17361
Re: McGrath
« Reply #105 on January 06, 2024, 08:04:33 pm by dickos1 »
Our wage bill must be amongst the biggest in the league. Purely on numbers, our squad is massive.
The budget isn’t the problem it’s how it’s been spent over last 3 years

The budget is good this season with the size of the squad and the signings made.

But last year and especially that Wellens / McSheffrey L1 relegation squad, the budget will have been pitiful.

This team is average this year, but it would easily still beat that season’s team in a game.

I agree and that’s the point I was making earlier when people were saying we had a load of. Enter halves, and we should t sign anymore.
We need to sign more, if we already got a load who aren’t good enough then even more so

sedwardsdrfc

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 4784
Re: McGrath
« Reply #106 on January 06, 2024, 08:34:54 pm by sedwardsdrfc »
We must have the biggest underperformance relative to budget this season in L2. Y a long way I’d imagine.

The fact we have 7 centre halves shows we have a decent budget we’re just choosing to spend it on poor signings.

dickos1

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 17361
Re: McGrath
« Reply #107 on January 06, 2024, 08:38:44 pm by dickos1 »
McCann had to do this though, he needs the summer to get rid of all the players that aren’t his.

sedwardsdrfc

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 4784
Re: McGrath
« Reply #108 on January 06, 2024, 08:45:26 pm by sedwardsdrfc »
McCann had to do this though, he needs the summer to get rid of all the players that aren’t his.


Agree. I’m not saying it’s all his fault, although we should be more consistent.

There were comments saying how we’ve poor players because of limited budget but that’s not true we’ve just wasted it and that pre dates McCann.

Hopefully next season we hire a better medical/ fitness team and allowing a smaller and better quality squad.

GazLaz

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 13404
Re: McGrath
« Reply #109 on January 06, 2024, 09:07:32 pm by GazLaz »
McCann had to do this though, he needs the summer to get rid of all the players that aren’t his.


Getting rid of players is something we are poor at. Obvious ones will be released but we have a bad habit of giving contracts to players when we shouldn’t and struggle moving players on that are under contract.

DearneValleyRover

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 7810
Re: McGrath
« Reply #110 on January 06, 2024, 09:11:23 pm by DearneValleyRover »
I agree with that Gaz, we are too loyal to players, I’m unsure if the club believes this endears themselves but in reality it does little to attract the right players

sedwardsdrfc

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 4784
Re: McGrath
« Reply #111 on January 06, 2024, 09:18:51 pm by sedwardsdrfc »
McCann had to do this though, he needs the summer to get rid of all the players that aren’t his.


Getting rid of players is something we are poor at. Obvious ones will be released but we have a bad habit of giving contracts to players when we shouldn’t and struggle moving players on that are under contract.

The Anderson one was just bizarre. Cops was involved then because it was before McCann. Stinks of jobs for the boys or just rose tinted glasses on a player who’s been here a while.

« Last Edit: January 06, 2024, 09:38:05 pm by sedwardsdrfc »

Chris Black come back

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 15027
Re: McGrath
« Reply #112 on January 06, 2024, 09:26:52 pm by Chris Black come back »
McCann had to do this though, he needs the summer to get rid of all the players that aren’t his.


Getting rid of players is something we are poor at. Obvious ones will be released but we have a bad habit of giving contracts to players when we shouldn’t and struggle moving players on that are under contract.

The Anderson one was just bizarre. Cops was involved then because it was before McCann. Stinks of jobs for the jobs or just rose tinted glasses on a player who’s been here a while.



2.5 years for Anderson. 3 years for Taylor.

GazLaz

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 13404
Re: McGrath
« Reply #113 on January 06, 2024, 09:41:48 pm by GazLaz »
McCann had to do this though, he needs the summer to get rid of all the players that aren’t his.


Getting rid of players is something we are poor at. Obvious ones will be released but we have a bad habit of giving contracts to players when we shouldn’t and struggle moving players on that are under contract.

The Anderson one was just bizarre. Cops was involved then because it was before McCann. Stinks of jobs for the jobs or just rose tinted glasses on a player who’s been here a while.



2.5 years for Anderson. 3 years for Taylor.

Sentimental decisions. McGrath didn’t need to be 2.5 years either. 18months with an option seems more realistic for this type of player. Helps if your dad is the managers: “head of recruitments” mate though I suppose.

ncRover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 4474
Re: McGrath
« Reply #114 on January 07, 2024, 05:49:52 pm by ncRover »
Gaz is right on sentimental decisions.

But I also think there is a strange irrational fear from the club (and sometimes supporters) that if we let a player go and that player subsequently goes on to do semi-decent somewhere else then that is really bad.

As good as he’s been for us, I doubt Cambridge fans are debating whether they should have let Joe Ironside go. Because his time with them naturally came to an end and he was ready to drop a level.

GazLaz

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 13404
Re: McGrath
« Reply #115 on January 07, 2024, 05:57:46 pm by GazLaz »
Gaz is right on sentimental decisions.

But I also think there is a strange irrational fear from the club (and sometimes supporters) that if we let a player go and that player subsequently goes on to do semi-decent somewhere else then that is really bad.

As good as he’s been for us, I doubt Cambridge fans are debating whether they should have let Joe Ironside go. Because his time with them naturally came to an end and he was ready to drop a level.

There are so many traps/ biases that you can fall into around those situations. Thats just human nature. Eliminating it would be a net long term positive for us.

Chris Black come back

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 15027
Re: McGrath
« Reply #116 on January 07, 2024, 06:01:56 pm by Chris Black come back »
PNE fans now fretting that Whiteman won’t sign his deal and leaves for nowt in summer.  Very bad result for us.

mushRTID

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 7871
Re: McGrath
« Reply #117 on January 13, 2024, 05:39:47 pm by mushRTID »
Solid debut. Lovely left foot on him, big unit.
Not sure if he was at fault for the goal or not but looks an upgrade on Anderson and Olowu.

big fat yorkshire pudding

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 13987
Re: McGrath
« Reply #118 on January 13, 2024, 05:59:20 pm by big fat yorkshire pudding »
Very good debut I thought, impressed me.

vaya

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 2898
Re: McGrath
« Reply #119 on January 13, 2024, 06:01:06 pm by vaya »
Distribution pretty good as well.

 

TinyPortal © 2005-2012