Angela Rayner thread

[Filo]

Why can’t I view any update on that thread, I can’t even see my latest post on there

[Bentley Bullet]

Me neither.

[SydneyRover]

I thought it was just me and reported it in the forum issues, where I see filo's post.

[ravenrover]

And me
If you click on a post to quote it as if in a message you can dee the latest posts

[SydneyRover]

I can see the posts if not logged in, they disappear when I login

[SydneyRover]

It's probably a sign that Angela Is Innocent

[Filo]

It’s the deep state, the very deep state

[drfchound]

The last one I can see on there is by sproty on 28th March.

[Sprotyrover]

I know…Nothing!!! It wasn’t me!

[selby]

  It's them old lucky legs

[Iberian Red]

  It's them old lucky legs

You old misogynistic t**t.

[SydneyRover]

Hey Steve I can see you posted on the AR thread there's a few of us that can't

[scawsby steve]

I reckon the mods have derailed the thread because we're all drooling over Angela's legs, which is detracting from the political substance of the subject.

I still reckon she flashed Boris though.

[scawsby steve]

Hey Steve I can see you posted on the AR thread there's a few of us that can't

Yes, I posted it, Syd, but nothing happened. Is this the start of Putin's cyber attacks?

[SydneyRover]

I'll just point out that most of those getting stuck into AR are the ones that pronounced Starmer guilty of beergate before the fact and and that johson was innocent of partygate, just saying like.

[SydneyRover]

Hey Steve I can see you posted on the AR thread there's a few of us that can't

Yes, I posted it, Syd, but nothing happened. Is this the start of Putin's cyber attacks?

Logged out I can read the 'missing' posts

[scawsby steve]

I'll just point out that most of those getting stuck into AR are the ones that pronounced Starmer guilty of beergate before the fact and and that johson was innocent of partygate, just saying like.

I can't recall one person on here saying that Johnson was innocent of Partygate.

[Iberian Red]

I'll just point out that most of those getting stuck into AR are the ones that pronounced Starmer guilty of beergate before the fact and and that johson was innocent of partygate, just saying like.

I can't recall one person on here saying that Johnson was innocent of Partygate.

Ha,ha,ha,ha








































I can't express enough ha,ha without filling up all the pages on the off topic on that one.
Must be an age thing SS,like your band of friends keep hilariously joking about.

[scawsby steve]

I'll just point out that most of those getting stuck into AR are the ones that pronounced Starmer guilty of beergate before the fact and and that johson was innocent of partygate, just saying like.

I can't recall one person on here saying that Johnson was innocent of Partygate.

Ha,ha,ha,ha








































I can't express enough ha,ha without filling up all the pages on the off topic on that one.
Must be an age thing SS,like your band of friends keep hilariously joking about.

Show me the evidence, and I'll hold my hand up, as I always do.

As regards having lots of friends, especially in the South Stand, that's what happens when you're a good guy.

[SydneyRover]

You're maybe right Steve, on the 'Talk your way out of this one johnson' thread around 250 pages about partygate I cannot see you saying johnson is innocent, but I cannot see any criticism of him from you either.

There is the usual flannelling of course ............

''Thing is, everyone in their right mind knows that this partying inquest has blown over any form of reasonable proportion simply for political reasons, and it has been amplified for the simple reason that the opposition has absolutely nothing going for it and can only raise its own popularity by lowering the oppositions.

Put it this way, how many of you Labour lot would have condemned a Labour government so vehemently for doing the same thing?''

[scawsby steve]

You're maybe right Steve, on the 'Talk your way out of this one johnson' thread around 250 pages about partygate I cannot see you saying johnson is innocent, but I cannot see any criticism of him from you either.

There is the usual flannelling of course ............

''Thing is, everyone in their right mind knows that this partying inquest has blown over any form of reasonable proportion simply for political reasons, and it has been amplified for the simple reason that the opposition has absolutely nothing going for it and can only raise its own popularity by lowering the oppositions.

Put it this way, how many of you Labour lot would have condemned a Labour government so vehemently for doing the same thing?''

You've not quoted a name. You could have made that up yourself.

[SydneyRover]

Just accept that it is genuine, I don't deliberately mislead Steve unless it is just a bit of banter then of course I may give someone a poke

[drfchound]

You're maybe right Steve, on the 'Talk your way out of this one johnson' thread around 250 pages about partygate I cannot see you saying johnson is innocent, but I cannot see any criticism of him from you either.

There is the usual flannelling of course ............

''Thing is, everyone in their right mind knows that this partying inquest has blown over any form of reasonable proportion simply for political reasons, and it has been amplified for the simple reason that the opposition has absolutely nothing going for it and can only raise its own popularity by lowering the oppositions.

Put it this way, how many of you Labour lot would have condemned a Labour government so vehemently for doing the same thing?''

You've not quoted a name. You could have made that up yourself.

SS, it says much about Syd that he spent around two hours scanning 250 pages of a thread looking for something to prove your statement wrong.
If he has found something he should do what he asked me to do when accusing me of deleting a post, SHOW THE POST AS IT APPEARED ON THIS FORUM.
Just show it as a quote.
If he can do that we can see that it isn’t something else that he has made up.

[SydneyRover]

You're maybe right Steve, on the 'Talk your way out of this one johnson' thread around 250 pages about partygate I cannot see you saying johnson is innocent, but I cannot see any criticism of him from you either.

There is the usual flannelling of course ............

''Thing is, everyone in their right mind knows that this partying inquest has blown over any form of reasonable proportion simply for political reasons, and it has been amplified for the simple reason that the opposition has absolutely nothing going for it and can only raise its own popularity by lowering the oppositions.

Put it this way, how many of you Labour lot would have condemned a Labour government so vehemently for doing the same thing?''

You've not quoted a name. You could have made that up yourself.

With word search it takes a couple of minutes or less Steve, it's not difficult.

[drfchound]

Just show the post Syd, as it appears on the forum.
If it’s easy why don’t you do it?

[SydneyRover]

You're maybe right Steve, on the 'Talk your way out of this one johnson' thread around 250 pages about partygate I cannot see you saying johnson is innocent, but I cannot see any criticism of him from you either.

There is the usual flannelling of course ............

''Thing is, everyone in their right mind knows that this partying inquest has blown over any form of reasonable proportion simply for political reasons, and it has been amplified for the simple reason that the opposition has absolutely nothing going for it and can only raise its own popularity by lowering the oppositions.

Put it this way, how many of you Labour lot would have condemned a Labour government so vehemently for doing the same thing?''

You've not quoted a name. You could have made that up yourself.

And ...... if you ever want to find who posted anything just copy and paste it into the word search box and voila there it is.

[Sprotyrover]

You're maybe right Steve, on the 'Talk your way out of this one johnson' thread around 250 pages about partygate I cannot see you saying johnson is innocent, but I cannot see any criticism of him from you either.

There is the usual flannelling of course ............

''Thing is, everyone in their right mind knows that this partying inquest has blown over any form of reasonable proportion simply for political reasons, and it has been amplified for the simple reason that the opposition has absolutely nothing going for it and can only raise its own popularity by lowering the oppositions.

Put it this way, how many of you Labour lot would have condemned a Labour government so vehemently for doing the same thing?''

You've not quoted a name. You could have made that up yourself.

And ...... if you ever want to find who posted anything just copy and paste it into the word search box and voila there it is.

Slandersome Syd strikes again!

[SydneyRover]

sue me spotty?

[drfchound]

Did someone mention sue?

[scawsby steve]

Did someone mention sue?

As I've said before, mate; Rita, Sue, and Sydney too.