Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
October 15, 2025, 01:40:31 pm

Login with username, password and session length

Links


Join the VSC


FSA logo

Author Topic: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care  (Read 5249 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Iberian Red

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 2236
Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
« Reply #30 on June 08, 2024, 03:59:56 pm by Iberian Red »
So, obviously you haven't ever thought of doing everybody a favour and f**king off. You are an undefendable, obnoxious sad sack who should keep your hate-filled, poisoned, unbalanced opinions to yourself.

You are one very disturbed individual.

Hmm.

I'm getting a bit of a hypocritical vibe coming thro here.

Nothing to say about child abuse?

Take a long,deep breath.

Then hold it.



For a week or two.
I think paedo's should imprisoned and have their b*llocks removed.

I also think you should be banned from this forum thus having your b*llocks removed.

Why not post that in the first place,rather than just attack me.

You appear to have some very serious anger management issues.

I can sense you getting redder and redder in the face.

Be careful with that, it can't be good for your blood pressure or health.



(want to hide these ads? Join the VSC today!)

Bentley Bullet

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 21724
Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
« Reply #31 on June 08, 2024, 04:08:34 pm by Bentley Bullet »
I attack you because you're an undefendable, obnoxious sad sack who should have treatment to help keep your hate-filled, poisoned, unbalanced opinions to yourself. You are one very disturbed individual who needs to be told the truth.

 No one is doing you any favours by ignoring your input when it is obvious you need professional help.

Who knows, you might thank me one day.



Iberian Red

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 2236
Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
« Reply #32 on June 08, 2024, 04:13:59 pm by Iberian Red »
Oh dear!

I sincerely hope you feel better after your rants.
Don't kick the dog or missus BB please.

Bentley Bullet

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 21724
Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
« Reply #33 on June 08, 2024, 04:24:20 pm by Bentley Bullet »
Oh dear!

I sincerely hope you feel better after your rants.
Don't kick the dog or missus BB please.
You see, that's my point. What might be a normal reaction for you is not the reaction of normal folk.

Iberian Red

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 2236
Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
« Reply #34 on June 08, 2024, 04:30:14 pm by Iberian Red »
A far more appropriate acronym for BB would be bye bye.

redwine

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 784
Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
« Reply #35 on June 08, 2024, 04:36:04 pm by redwine »
Checking in to see who will have the last word.

 ;)

Iberian Red

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 2236
Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
« Reply #36 on June 08, 2024, 04:42:49 pm by Iberian Red »
Checking in to see who will have the last word.

 ;)

You! :lol:

Padge_DRFC

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 5781
Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
« Reply #37 on June 08, 2024, 04:55:07 pm by Padge_DRFC »
where is this thread going?

How many in the uk have had consensual sex before the age of 16 of either sex?

Not sure you've grasped what has happened. Or what the OP is about! Well hopefully anyway.

Iberian Red

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 2236
Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
« Reply #38 on June 08, 2024, 04:58:59 pm by Iberian Red »
where is this thread going?

How many in the uk have had consensual sex before the age of 16 of either sex?

Not sure you've grasped what has happened. Or what the OP is about! Well hopefully anyway.

Did you read Wilts post above?

SydneyRover

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 17487
Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
« Reply #39 on June 08, 2024, 05:59:32 pm by SydneyRover »
where is this thread going?

How many in the uk have had consensual sex before the age of 16 of either sex?

Not sure you've grasped what has happened. Or what the OP is about! Well hopefully anyway.

I've grasped over time that sprot spends his time picking out those with differing values to make some sort of weird point Padge and possibly and tenuously hoping that some would agree and support the far right of politics as he appears to do.

hope that answers some or all of your enquiry.

Padge_DRFC

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 5781
Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
« Reply #40 on June 08, 2024, 07:47:09 pm by Padge_DRFC »
where is this thread going?

How many in the uk have had consensual sex before the age of 16 of either sex?

Not sure you've grasped what has happened. Or what the OP is about! Well hopefully anyway.

I've grasped over time that sprot spends his time picking out those with differing values to make some sort of weird point Padge and possibly and tenuously hoping that some would agree and support the far right of politics as he appears to do.

hope that answers some or all of your enquiry.

Say you're a hypocrite without saying your hypocrite in one post

SydneyRover

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 17487
Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
« Reply #41 on June 08, 2024, 08:56:34 pm by SydneyRover »
Say what you wish Padge I'd not want to spend time with anyone that lives by the credo of religious books written a couple of thousand years ago.

If you think that your comment about it adds to the thread that's fine by me.

« Last Edit: June 08, 2024, 08:59:10 pm by SydneyRover »

wilts rover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 10354
Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
« Reply #42 on June 08, 2024, 10:15:31 pm by wilts rover »
Wilts 1) the article is 15 months old, I seem to recall it being mentioned on here. Over a year ago!
2) the post was from the BBC news feed and operation STOVEWOOD was incepted to investigate some 1000 plus,complaints by English Heritage women who alleged that they had been groomed and Sexually abused by Pakistani Heritage men from South Yorks mainly Rotherham.

https://www.nationalcrimeagency.gov.uk/what-we-do/crime-threats/operation-stovewood-rotherham-child-sexual-abuse-investigation

3) also locally this week. a Doncaster man was sentenced to 18 years imprisonment for befriending 2 underage girls on the internet and subsequently Blackmailing them into post lewd pictures of themselves performing sexual acts on each other, I applaud the sentence.

4) Moderators please note the post no 15  in the thread from Wilts he is accusing me of being a racist and I find that vey offensive!

I also note that ChrisBx and Hounslow rover have liked his very offensive post!

Yes you would remember it being posted on here - I posted it then.

I read what you post sproty - so does everyone else. I also see what's in the news that you don't post - so does everyone else.

If you don't like what I post tough. Here's some dots to join....

Sprotyrover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 6096
Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
« Reply #43 on June 08, 2024, 11:04:52 pm by Sprotyrover »
Wilts 1) the article is 15 months old, I seem to recall it being mentioned on here. Over a year ago!
2) the post was from the BBC news feed and operation STOVEWOOD was incepted to investigate some 1000 plus,complaints by English Heritage women who alleged that they had been groomed and Sexually abused by Pakistani Heritage men from South Yorks mainly Rotherham.

https://www.nationalcrimeagency.gov.uk/what-we-do/crime-threats/operation-stovewood-rotherham-child-sexual-abuse-investigation

3) also locally this week. a Doncaster man was sentenced to 18 years imprisonment for befriending 2 underage girls on the internet and subsequently Blackmailing them into post lewd pictures of themselves performing sexual acts on each other, I applaud the sentence.

4) Moderators please note the post no 15  in the thread from Wilts he is accusing me of being a racist and I find that vey offensive!

I also note that ChrisBx and Hounslow rover have liked his very offensive post!

Yes you would remember it being posted on here - I posted it then.

I read what you post sproty - so does everyone else. I also see what's in the news that you don't post - so does everyone else.

If you don't like what I post tough. Here's some dots to join....
I am surprised with you Wilts I thought you were a decent person but just lately you have shown yourself up!

Herbert Anchovy

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 2438
Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
« Reply #44 on June 09, 2024, 01:54:04 am by Herbert Anchovy »
Please. Don’t use these horrific crimes as a way to score points as part of a petty squabble.

Bump

Lads, please. Take these arguments to another topic eh? All of us, whatever your political view point, must surely agree that these are horrendous crimes. Let’s all agree on that point and not belittle the horrors these kids have gone through with our petty squabbling.

wilts rover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 10354
Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
« Reply #45 on June 09, 2024, 08:24:01 am by wilts rover »
Herbert - it is the horrific nature of crimes like these that makes it even MORE important that people who attempt to use them for political point scoring and to reinforce a particular political point of view are called out for it.


Bentley Bullet

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 21724
Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
« Reply #46 on June 09, 2024, 08:37:45 am by Bentley Bullet »
Can someone explain to me what these horrific crimes have to do with politics? Surely all political parties are repulsed by them?

DRFC_AjA

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 656
Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
« Reply #47 on June 09, 2024, 11:14:55 am by DRFC_AjA »
Now how dare you. Despite it being proven that there was a fear of being accused of pointing out it was a certain 'group' despite it being proven that this 'group' specifically targeted white females, you're still not allowed to point that out. You damn fascist. The left will still do exactly the same, they'll point out child abuse is rife in Catholicism, comedians will still make jokes about it, but that's fine FYI....because they're scared of that 'group' and their religion

Sprotyrover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 6096
Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
« Reply #48 on June 09, 2024, 12:16:11 pm by Sprotyrover »
Now how dare you. Despite it being proven that there was a fear of being accused of pointing out it was a certain 'group' despite it being proven that this 'group' specifically targeted white females, you're still not allowed to point that out. You damn fascist. The left will still do exactly the same, they'll point out child abuse is rife in Catholicism, comedians will still make jokes about it, but that's fine FYI....because they're scared of that 'group' and their religion
You mean like Facist Syd did on this thread ?
And worst still he is or was Catholic!

drfchound

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 34093
Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
« Reply #49 on June 09, 2024, 05:06:25 pm by drfchound »
I don’t even know why Syd felt the need to even mention the catholic thing.

DRFC_AjA

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 656
Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
« Reply #50 on June 09, 2024, 05:19:59 pm by DRFC_AjA »
Exactly. I'm taking the p*** out the left who'll constantly point out catholic priest whenever someone mentions Muslim grooming gangs. A specific group of people specifically targeted a specific group of people (white girls) it's the very definition of "usual suspects" doing the usual thing. But if you point that out you're the bad guy. Meanwhile laughs and jokes and constant pointing out what catholic priests did. Pointing out one is socally acceptable even joked about,  the other is terrible and you a fascist. Guess which is which
« Last Edit: June 09, 2024, 05:26:56 pm by DRFC_AjA »

wilts rover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 10354
Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
« Reply #51 on June 09, 2024, 06:30:28 pm by wilts rover »
Now how dare you. Despite it being proven that there was a fear of being accused of pointing out it was a certain 'group' despite it being proven that this 'group' specifically targeted white females, you're still not allowed to point that out. You damn fascist. The left will still do exactly the same, they'll point out child abuse is rife in Catholicism, comedians will still make jokes about it, but that's fine FYI....because they're scared of that 'group' and their religion

Yes mate, most child abusers are white men. Is that what you mean? Because some people seem to have a problem with that:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-65174096

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/dec/15/child-sexual-abuse-gangs-white-men-home-office-report

https://fullfact.org/crime/what-do-we-know-about-ethnicity-people-involved-sexual-offences-against-children/

It is actually prevelent in the far-right community. A fascist from Barnsley was jailed last week for amnong other things - 900 indecent images of children. Why has no-one pubished this:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c84418eq2n2o

And why are the far-right so keen on attempting to make paedophlia a race issue. Have a search for what they also do - that might tell you what they are attempting to hide/cover up:

https://bylinetimes.com/2024/06/01/special-investigation-the-network-of-far-right-groups-exploiting-the-survivors-of-child-sexual-exploitation/

https://www.vice.com/en/article/3akvbw/why-do-neo-nazis-keep-getting-arrested-for-child-porn

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/neo-nazi-child-abuse-prison-sentence-porn-sonnenkrieg-division-a9632636.html

https://hopenothate.org.uk/2022/01/11/tommy-robinson-is-a-hypocrite-when-it-comes-to-opposing-child-sexual-exploitation/

wilts rover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 10354
Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
« Reply #52 on June 09, 2024, 06:36:06 pm by wilts rover »
By the way for avoidance of doubt I don't believe sproty is a racist. I don't ever remembering him posting anything explicitly racist (whilst other posters have).

I think he is badly advised where he gets his information from - and has not really thought through what he posts. And what he doesn't. Maybe now he will be more thoughtful in future.

Bentley Bullet

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 21724
Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
« Reply #53 on June 09, 2024, 06:54:41 pm by Bentley Bullet »
Wilts.

Can you explain what these horrific crimes have to do with politics? Surely all political parties are repulsed by them?

BillyStubbsTears

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 40147
Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
« Reply #54 on June 09, 2024, 07:12:11 pm by BillyStubbsTears »
Exactly. I'm taking the p*** out the left who'll constantly point out catholic priest whenever someone mentions Muslim grooming gangs. A specific group of people specifically targeted a specific group of people (white girls) it's the very definition of "usual suspects" doing the usual thing. But if you point that out you're the bad guy. Meanwhile laughs and jokes and constant pointing out what catholic priests did. Pointing out one is socally acceptable even joked about,  the other is terrible and you a fascist. Guess which is which

You DO know that by far the greatest amount of sexual abuse in this country is committed by white men?

If Sproty and you meant "sex criminals" when you said "the usual suspects", there'd be nothing to argue about and we'd all be in agreement.

But you don't mean that do you?

Sprotyrover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 6096
Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
« Reply #55 on June 09, 2024, 07:16:36 pm by Sprotyrover »
By the way for avoidance of doubt I don't believe sproty is a racist. I don't ever remembering him posting anything explicitly racist (whilst other posters have).

I think he is badly advised where he gets his information from - and has not really thought through what he posts. And what he doesn't. Maybe now he will be more thoughtful in future.
Well if you can’t post an article on here off of the BBC News site what can you post? Is  Nanny Wilts alleging that the BBC is Racist?
Nanny Wilts seems to like chucking the ‘Racist ‘ allegation about when somebody posts something that doesn’t fit in nicely with their Woke agenda! Typical of the Libertine lefty posters on here!

Sprotyrover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 6096
Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
« Reply #56 on June 09, 2024, 07:18:11 pm by Sprotyrover »
Exactly. I'm taking the p*** out the left who'll constantly point out catholic priest whenever someone mentions Muslim grooming gangs. A specific group of people specifically targeted a specific group of people (white girls) it's the very definition of "usual suspects" doing the usual thing. But if you point that out you're the bad guy. Meanwhile laughs and jokes and constant pointing out what catholic priests did. Pointing out one is socally acceptable even joked about,  the other is terrible and you a fascist. Guess which is which

You DO know that by far the greatest amount of sexual abuse in this country is committed by white men?

If Sproty and you meant "sex criminals" when you said "the usual suspects", there'd be nothing to argue about and we'd all be in agreement.

But you don't mean that do you?

WIND YOUR NECKIN! When did I say usual suspects?

Iberian Red

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 2236
Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
« Reply #57 on June 09, 2024, 07:21:48 pm by Iberian Red »
Exactly. I'm taking the p*** out the left who'll constantly point out catholic priest whenever someone mentions Muslim grooming gangs. A specific group of people specifically targeted a specific group of people (white girls) it's the very definition of "usual suspects" doing the usual thing. But if you point that out you're the bad guy. Meanwhile laughs and jokes and constant pointing out what catholic priests did. Pointing out one is socally acceptable even joked about,  the other is terrible and you a fascist. Guess which is which

You DO know that by far the greatest amount of sexual abuse in this country is committed by white men?

If Sproty and you meant "sex criminals" when you said "the usual suspects", there'd be nothing to argue about and we'd all be in agreement.

But you don't mean that do you?

I did try to point that out earlier in this thread,only a have bile spewed my way the the forums resident f@ck wit,who not until pressed offered any kind of opinion on child abuse.

BillyStubbsTears

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 40147
Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
« Reply #58 on June 09, 2024, 07:37:47 pm by BillyStubbsTears »
Exactly. I'm taking the p*** out the left who'll constantly point out catholic priest whenever someone mentions Muslim grooming gangs. A specific group of people specifically targeted a specific group of people (white girls) it's the very definition of "usual suspects" doing the usual thing. But if you point that out you're the bad guy. Meanwhile laughs and jokes and constant pointing out what catholic priests did. Pointing out one is socally acceptable even joked about,  the other is terrible and you a fascist. Guess which is which

You DO know that by far the greatest amount of sexual abuse in this country is committed by white men?

If Sproty and you meant "sex criminals" when you said "the usual suspects", there'd be nothing to argue about and we'd all be in agreement.

But you don't mean that do you?

WIND YOUR NECKIN! When did I say usual suspects?

Err. I MIGHT be wrong but I think it was possibly when you said "it's the very definition of "usual suspects" doing the usual thing."

Iberian Red

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 2236
Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
« Reply #59 on June 09, 2024, 07:41:57 pm by Iberian Red »
By the way for avoidance of doubt I don't believe sproty is a racist. I don't ever remembering him posting anything explicitly racist (whilst other posters have).

I think he is badly advised where he gets his information from - and has not really thought through what he posts. And what he doesn't. Maybe now he will be more thoughtful in future.
Well if you can’t post an article on here off of the BBC News site what can you post? Is  Nanny Wilts alleging that the BBC is Racist?
Nanny Wilts seems to like chucking the ‘Racist ‘ allegation about when somebody posts something that doesn’t fit in nicely with their Woke agenda! Typical of the Libertine lefty posters on here!

Ah well,at least you tried Wilts.
Some people just can't help themselves even when offered help.

 

TinyPortal © 2005-2012