Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
October 15, 2025, 01:40:29 pm

Login with username, password and session length

Links


Join the VSC


FSA logo

Author Topic: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care  (Read 5248 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Sprotyrover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 6096
Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
« Reply #60 on June 09, 2024, 07:51:28 pm by Sprotyrover »
Exactly. I'm taking the p*** out the left who'll constantly point out catholic priest whenever someone mentions Muslim grooming gangs. A specific group of people specifically targeted a specific group of people (white girls) it's the very definition of "usual suspects" doing the usual thing. But if you point that out you're the bad guy. Meanwhile laughs and jokes and constant pointing out what catholic priests did. Pointing out one is socally acceptable even joked about,  the other is terrible and you a fascist. Guess which is which

You DO know that by far the greatest amount of sexual abuse in this country is committed by white men?

If Sproty and you meant "sex criminals" when you said "the usual suspects", there'd be nothing to argue about and we'd all be in agreement.

But you don't mean that do you?

WIND YOUR NECKIN! When did I say usual suspects?

Err. I MIGHT be wrong but I think it was possibly when you said "it's the very definition of "usual suspects" doing the usual thing."
YOU ARE VERY WRONG MUPPET !



(want to hide these ads? Join the VSC today!)

BillyStubbsTears

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 40147
Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
« Reply #61 on June 09, 2024, 07:57:33 pm by BillyStubbsTears »
My apologies Sproty, I didn't check it was you replying. And on checking back, I was wrong. It wasn't you who said that. I apologise.

Bentley Bullet

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 21724
Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
« Reply #62 on June 09, 2024, 07:58:21 pm by Bentley Bullet »
Exactly. I'm taking the p*** out the left who'll constantly point out catholic priest whenever someone mentions Muslim grooming gangs. A specific group of people specifically targeted a specific group of people (white girls) it's the very definition of "usual suspects" doing the usual thing. But if you point that out you're the bad guy. Meanwhile laughs and jokes and constant pointing out what catholic priests did. Pointing out one is socally acceptable even joked about,  the other is terrible and you a fascist. Guess which is which

You DO know that by far the greatest amount of sexual abuse in this country is committed by white men?

If Sproty and you meant "sex criminals" when you said "the usual suspects", there'd be nothing to argue about and we'd all be in agreement.

But you don't mean that do you?

I did try to point that out earlier in this thread,only a have bile spewed my way the the forums resident f@ck wit,who not until pressed offered any kind of opinion on child abuse.
I've been thinking, regarding my comments to you yesterday. Perhaps I was wrong to suggest you got professional help for your state of mind.

Maybe if you don't like getting professional help for your state of mind conventionally, why not try a different approach? It is often said that to become what you want to be you have to get rid of what you are now.

Have you considered a penectomy?

Sprotyrover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 6096
Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
« Reply #63 on June 09, 2024, 07:58:46 pm by Sprotyrover »
By the way for avoidance of doubt I don't believe sproty is a racist. I don't ever remembering him posting anything explicitly racist (whilst other posters have).

I think he is badly advised where he gets his information from - and has not really thought through what he posts. And what he doesn't. Maybe now he will be more thoughtful in future.
Well if you can’t post an article on here off of the BBC News site what can you post? Is  Nanny Wilts alleging that the BBC is Racist?
Nanny Wilts seems to like chucking the ‘Racist ‘ allegation about when somebody posts something that doesn’t fit in nicely with their Woke agenda! Typical of the Libertine lefty posters on here!

Ah well,at least you tried Wilts.
Some people just can't help themselves even when offered help.
If Wilts listens to your advice he is even sadder than I thought!

Iberian Red

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 2236
Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
« Reply #64 on June 09, 2024, 08:13:37 pm by Iberian Red »
Exactly. I'm taking the p*** out the left who'll constantly point out catholic priest whenever someone mentions Muslim grooming gangs. A specific group of people specifically targeted a specific group of people (white girls) it's the very definition of "usual suspects" doing the usual thing. But if you point that out you're the bad guy. Meanwhile laughs and jokes and constant pointing out what catholic priests did. Pointing out one is socally acceptable even joked about,  the other is terrible and you a fascist. Guess which is which

You DO know that by far the greatest amount of sexual abuse in this country is committed by white men?

If Sproty and you meant "sex criminals" when you said "the usual suspects", there'd be nothing to argue about and we'd all be in agreement.

But you don't mean that do you?

I did try to point that out earlier in this thread,only a have bile spewed my way the the forums resident f@ck wit,who not until pressed offered any kind of opinion on child abuse.
I've been thinking, regarding my comments to you yesterday. Perhaps I was wrong to suggest you got professional help for your state of mind.

Maybe if you don't like getting professional help for your state of mind conventionally, why not try a different approach? It is often said that to become what you want to be you have to get rid of what you are now.

Have you considered a penectomy?

No fella,not going to try it.

Your failed attempt at your forehead surgery put me off.

Bentley Bullet

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 21724
Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
« Reply #65 on June 09, 2024, 09:22:52 pm by Bentley Bullet »
Exactly. I'm taking the p*** out the left who'll constantly point out catholic priest whenever someone mentions Muslim grooming gangs. A specific group of people specifically targeted a specific group of people (white girls) it's the very definition of "usual suspects" doing the usual thing. But if you point that out you're the bad guy. Meanwhile laughs and jokes and constant pointing out what catholic priests did. Pointing out one is socally acceptable even joked about,  the other is terrible and you a fascist. Guess which is which

You DO know that by far the greatest amount of sexual abuse in this country is committed by white men?

If Sproty and you meant "sex criminals" when you said "the usual suspects", there'd be nothing to argue about and we'd all be in agreement.

But you don't mean that do you?

I did try to point that out earlier in this thread,only a have bile spewed my way the the forums resident f@ck wit,who not until pressed offered any kind of opinion on child abuse.
I've been thinking, regarding my comments to you yesterday. Perhaps I was wrong to suggest you got professional help for your state of mind.

Maybe if you don't like getting professional help for your state of mind conventionally, why not try a different approach? It is often said that to become what you want to be you have to get rid of what you are now.

Have you considered a penectomy?

No fella,not going to try it.

Your failed attempt at your forehead surgery put me off.
Perhaps you're right.

Maybe a sense of humour transplant would be more beneficial and encourage others to tolerate you more.

wilts rover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 10354
Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
« Reply #66 on June 10, 2024, 05:47:26 pm by wilts rover »
Wilts.

Can you explain what these horrific crimes have to do with politics? Surely all political parties are repulsed by them?

Yes all political parties are repulsed by them. But an unusually high number of far-right supporters have committed them.

There are links in post #51 that look at why.

wilts rover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 10354
Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
« Reply #67 on June 10, 2024, 05:48:36 pm by wilts rover »
By the way for avoidance of doubt I don't believe sproty is a racist. I don't ever remembering him posting anything explicitly racist (whilst other posters have).

I think he is badly advised where he gets his information from - and has not really thought through what he posts. And what he doesn't. Maybe now he will be more thoughtful in future.
Well if you can’t post an article on here off of the BBC News site what can you post? Is  Nanny Wilts alleging that the BBC is Racist?
Nanny Wilts seems to like chucking the ‘Racist ‘ allegation about when somebody posts something that doesn’t fit in nicely with their Woke agenda! Typical of the Libertine lefty posters on here!

Ah well,at least you tried Wilts.
Some people just can't help themselves even when offered help.

And I am afraid only confirm what I have already said about them.

Bentley Bullet

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 21724
Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
« Reply #68 on June 10, 2024, 06:39:28 pm by Bentley Bullet »
 
Wilts.

Can you explain what these horrific crimes have to do with politics? Surely all political parties are repulsed by them?

Yes all political parties are repulsed by them. But an unusually high number of far-right supporters have committed them.

There are links in post #51 that look at why.
Compared to who?

wilts rover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 10354
Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
« Reply #69 on June 10, 2024, 07:05:01 pm by wilts rover »
Wilts.

Can you explain what these horrific crimes have to do with politics? Surely all political parties are repulsed by them?

Yes all political parties are repulsed by them. But an unusually high number of far-right supporters have committed them.

There are links in post #51 that look at why.
Compared to who?


What does it say in post #51?

Bentley Bullet

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 21724
Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
« Reply #70 on June 10, 2024, 07:17:33 pm by Bentley Bullet »
I can't see anywhere it says "an unusually high number."

Mind you, I couldn't access a couple of the links so maybe you can show me them.
« Last Edit: June 10, 2024, 07:19:45 pm by Bentley Bullet »

Iberian Red

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 2236
Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
« Reply #71 on June 10, 2024, 07:20:50 pm by Iberian Red »
I can't see.

Mind you, I couldn't access a couple of the links so maybe you can show me them.

Sprotyrover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 6096
Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
« Reply #72 on June 10, 2024, 07:31:30 pm by Sprotyrover »
My apologies Sproty, I didn't check it was you replying. And on checking back, I was wrong. It wasn't you who said that. I apologise.
Cheers no harm done!

Iberian Red

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 2236
Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
« Reply #73 on June 10, 2024, 07:36:23 pm by Iberian Red »
Isn't it near your bedtime, Thrush? I hope your mummy's remembered it's a school day.

Made me laugh so much.

BillyStubbsTears

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 40147
Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
« Reply #74 on June 10, 2024, 07:45:51 pm by BillyStubbsTears »
My apologies Sproty, I didn't check it was you replying. And on checking back, I was wrong. It wasn't you who said that. I apologise.
Cheers no harm done!

Thanks. I'll try and be more careful in future. No excuse for it.

wilts rover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 10354
Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
« Reply #75 on June 10, 2024, 08:25:36 pm by wilts rover »
I can't see anywhere it says "an unusually high number."

Mind you, I couldn't access a couple of the links so maybe you can show me them.

Which ones?

Here's another on Tommy Robinson and members of the EDL under him:

For all its talk of Muslim paedophiles, the EDL was a hotbed of sex offenders. Since its formation, there have been at least 20 members and supporters convicted of child sexual exploitation offences. At least 10 of these were active in the EDL while Lennon was still leading it, and we are yet to find a single condemnation from Lennon.

Each of the following cases are perpetrators who were active in the EDL while Lennon was still leader:

Perhaps the most shocking case is that of Robert Ewing, who murdered the schoolgirl Paige Chivers after developing an “inappropriate sexual interest” in her.[iii] He was later prosecuted for abusing two other children in the 1990s.[iv] It later emerged that in 2013, Ewing wrote on Facebook, “Iv taken an interest in the EDL and iv attended a couple of demo’s.”[v]

Leigh Mcmillan, a senior EDL figure during Lennon’s time as leader who was active in the Lee Rigby campaign, was sentenced to 17 years after abusing a 10 year-old schoolgirl 100 times in the mid-1990s.[vi]

In 2010, the EDL supporter Brett Moses was given a 12-month prison sentence, suspended for two years, after he plead guilty to sexual grooming.[vii]

In 2011 John Broomfield, an active EDL supporter, admitted 20 counts of making indecent images of children. After his arrest alongside six others for conspiracy to cause an explosion – charges that were later dropped – the police found 236 indecent images depicting children and babies on his computers.[viii]

Also in 2011, Michael Coates was charged with a series of sex offences, including two attempted rapes. At the time he was active in the EDL splinter group the North West Infidels (NWI). Their leader, John Shaw, confirmed he had been active in the EDL previously, writing: “He like the rest of us was edl first then NWI.”[ix]

In 2011, a gang of racists attacked Redbridge Islamic Centre. During the attack they hurled racist abuse at those inside, including repeatedly shouting “EDL”. Later it emerged that Elliot Jones, one of the attackers on that day, was convicted of trying to incite a child into sexual activity.


Mark “Archie” Sleman was an EDL supporter active in London and Exeter and was known for running the Church of the Templars, which was mainly made up of EDL members. It transpired that he had been imprisoned for nine years in 1994 for the kidnap and rape of a ten-year-old girl.[xi]

In 2012 the well-known EDL member and regular demonstration attender Matthew Woodward was charged with possession of images of children as young as ten years old, and a video recording of another child.[xii]

Michael Kinnear was active in the EDL and is known to have attended a demonstration in July 2013 at which Lennon spoke.[xiii] In 2015 he was jailed after police found images on his mobile of a primary school aged girl “performing a type of striptease” and in state of undress.[xiv]

Since Lennon left the EDL in 2013, the group continued to attract support from child abusers and sex offenders, such as Bradley Daniel Alford,[xv] Alan Boulter,[xvi] Pete Gillett,[xvii] Luke Atkinson,[xviii] Dean Chambers,[xix] Bruce Cordwell,[xx] and Paul Whiteside amongst numerous others. Again, we can find no condemnations of these offenders from Lennon.

More recently, Lennon once again found himself allied with a sex offender. In June 2017, he shared a stage with William Charlton at a rally in Sunderland at an event where the sexual abuse of children was the key theme of the speeches. Lennon praised Charlton, saying ““I wouldn’t have heard of this campaign if it wasn’t for Billy,” adding “That battle has to be fought through every avenue.”[xxi] It later transpired that Charlton was found guilty of distributing an indecent photograph of a child.[xxii]

https://hopenothate.org.uk/2022/01/11/tommy-robinson-is-a-hypocrite-when-it-comes-to-opposing-child-sexual-exploitation/

Bentley Bullet

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 21724
Re: 7 Guilty of Grooming girls under 16 who were in Care
« Reply #76 on June 10, 2024, 08:34:52 pm by Bentley Bullet »
Wilts, I asked you where the link says an unusually high number of far-right supporters have committed gang rape, and who is the unusual number being compared to?

I'm not saying you're wrong, I just can't find the link.

 

TinyPortal © 2005-2012