Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
December 21, 2025, 10:36:37 am

Login with username, password and session length

Links


Join the VSC


FSA logo

Author Topic: That was a hard watch  (Read 6931 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Lesonthewest

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 3766
Re: That was a hard watch
« Reply #60 on January 01, 2025, 08:55:18 pm by Lesonthewest »
The lack of quality in any of our play today was palpable, we "escaped" from that game with all the points after given them a leg up with their goal. two half's of virtually 45 mins of abject numbness with 60secs of relief tagged onto each end.

For a team with pretensions of being champions i'm just not seeing it.

For all the talk of being in 2nd gear and when we get it together, the lack of any semblance of a game plan that will worry the better teams in this league is stark.

We played a team today who were every limited and they managed to make us stink the ground out. Just remember this the next time we play a team who played like Chesterfield did for example, we rode our luck today and got away with it.

It won't happen too many more times this season. I'm happy to except any win but my concerns grow stronger, we are disjointed and our "quality players" have become as weak and wasteful as little boys, if we don't inject some quality into our side then expect the rest of the season to resemble games like this, only without the injury time winner to bail us out again.

Nothings we are currently attempting to do gives me any assurance.

Top post, I agree entirely.



(want to hide these ads? Join the VSC today!)

Ryaldinhio

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 1118
Re: That was a hard watch
« Reply #61 on January 01, 2025, 08:55:34 pm by Ryaldinhio »
If that's the best you can come up, with you boring lot, then it's time to do what you threatened did you think that was a classic game of football? At times it was like watching both teams play Sunday morning football after a New Years eve on the p!ss

It is getting boring listening to the negativity

I didn't 'threaten' anything

No I don't think it was a classic game of football, but I'm also not expecting to see lots of quality classic football in League 2, I'm a realist.
 :byebye:

Padge_DRFC

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 5909
Re: That was a hard watch
« Reply #62 on January 01, 2025, 09:08:08 pm by Padge_DRFC »
TSL is better on crosses than TLT. Distribution better too. Going to be a very good keeper for sure

colincramb

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 2558
Re: That was a hard watch
« Reply #63 on January 01, 2025, 09:12:16 pm by colincramb »
The thing that bothers me on this forum is the utter reluctance of the constantly positive ones refusing to accept any criticism of the performances by posters that can see the weaknesses. It’s almost as if people cant be objective anymore and the only view that rules is ‘we are second’… ‘look where we were last season’ etc.

Well it’s not last season, we gave it the big’un about winning the league in pre-season and so far we aren’t delivering. Big improvement needed because that was utter dross today.

Lesonthewest

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 3766
Re: That was a hard watch
« Reply #64 on January 01, 2025, 09:14:28 pm by Lesonthewest »
The negativity is unbelievable on here,
New Year’s Day and 2nd in the table, we would’ve  been over the moon with that in July
True to form your 'negativity' word comes out again. You really seem to struggle with posters having opinions & concerns  regarding performances. Everyone seems to be happy with the league position & the 3 points today I for one am chuffed to bits, the performance however was truly awful.

Ryaldinhio

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 1118
Re: That was a hard watch
« Reply #65 on January 01, 2025, 09:17:18 pm by Ryaldinhio »
TSL is better on crosses than TLT. Distribution better too. Going to be a very good keeper for sure

As much as I would love TLT back as a permenant signing TSL is out of contract in summer aswell.

I just want a good permanent keeper, not searching for the next loanee every time.
« Last Edit: January 01, 2025, 09:24:06 pm by Ryaldinhio »

Lesonthewest

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 3766
Re: That was a hard watch
« Reply #66 on January 01, 2025, 09:22:03 pm by Lesonthewest »
The thing that bothers me on this forum is the utter reluctance of the constantly positive ones refusing to accept any criticism of the performances by posters that can see the weaknesses. It’s almost as if people cant be objective anymore and the only view that rules is ‘we are second’… ‘look where we were last season’ etc.

Well it’s not last season, we gave it the big’un about winning the league in pre-season and so far we aren’t delivering. Big improvement needed because that was utter dross today.
Another top post, performances need to improve, don't really care what the positive police come out with, yes but where we're we, back in the SOD days, Saunders, blah blah blah.

Ryaldinhio

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 1118
Re: That was a hard watch
« Reply #67 on January 01, 2025, 09:23:35 pm by Ryaldinhio »
The thing that bothers me on this forum is the utter reluctance of the constantly positive ones refusing to accept any criticism of the performances by posters that can see the weaknesses. It’s almost as if people cant be objective anymore and the only view that rules is ‘we are second’… ‘look where we were last season’ etc.

Well it’s not last season, we gave it the big’un about winning the league in pre-season and so far we aren’t delivering. Big improvement needed because that was utter dross today.
Another top post, performances need to improve, don't really care what the positive police come out with, yes but where we're we, back in the SOD days, Saunders, blah blah blah.

It's a beautiful language Patrick  :laugh:

Ryaldinhio

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 1118
Re: That was a hard watch
« Reply #68 on January 01, 2025, 09:37:50 pm by Ryaldinhio »
The thing that bothers me on this forum is the utter reluctance of the constantly positive ones refusing to accept any criticism of the performances by posters that can see the weaknesses. It’s almost as if people cant be objective anymore and the only view that rules is ‘we are second’… ‘look where we were last season’ etc.

Well it’s not last season, we gave it the big’un about winning the league in pre-season and so far we aren’t delivering. Big improvement needed because that was utter dross today.

It wasn't a great performance, we aren't a great team and we aren't in a great league.

I have no issue with detailed intelligent and knowledgeable critique of any performance, which in fairness CC you normally give. What does my nut in is the mindless negative drivel from a number on here.

redarmi66

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 480
Re: That was a hard watch
« Reply #69 on January 01, 2025, 09:38:01 pm by redarmi66 »
The thing that bothers me on this forum is the utter reluctance of the constantly positive ones refusing to accept any criticism of the performances by posters that can see the weaknesses. It’s almost as if people cant be objective anymore and the only view that rules is ‘we are second’… ‘look where we were last season’ etc.

Well it’s not last season, we gave it the big’un about winning the league in pre-season and so far we aren’t delivering. Big improvement needed because that was utter dross today.
Another top post, performances need to improve, don't really care what the positive police come out with, yes but where we're we, back in the SOD days, Saunders, blah blah blah.
You can be both! You can be constructively critical of performances but still positive that improvement will come. Or you can type negative unhelpful stuff that is detrimental to the team confidence. Stay positive and support the club/team

dickos1

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 17804
Re: That was a hard watch
« Reply #70 on January 01, 2025, 09:42:10 pm by dickos1 »
The negativity is unbelievable on here,
New Year’s Day and 2nd in the table, we would’ve  been over the moon with that in July
True to form your 'negativity' word comes out again. You really seem to struggle with posters having opinions & concerns  regarding performances. Everyone seems to be happy with the league position & the 3 points today I for one am chuffed to bits, the performance however was truly awful.

If you don’t think this thread is negative then I don’t know what else to say,
I didn’t bring up sod, it was more negative drivel regarding performances that brought it up.

Performances are nowhere near as bad as you’re making out, Tranmere was a good performance, first half against Walsall we were good and the first half against Colchester we were very good,
We’ve got 7 points from 4 games.

dickos1

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 17804
Re: That was a hard watch
« Reply #71 on January 01, 2025, 09:46:02 pm by dickos1 »
Agreed it’s another really poor performance masked by Billy Sharp doing what Billy Sharp does best. McCann did say he had a team that will go to the very end and that was proven today. A couple of new faces and a win on Saturday could really kickstart the season.

We’re sat in 2nd, the season doesn’t need kickstarting
How many threads do you wanna post on til you realise the performances won’t keep us the? Happy clapper.

You keep saying that, but we’ve got 7 points from 4 games over Xmas.
You keeping hoping it won’t keep us there and let’s just wait and see, we’re nowhere near as bad as you’re making out, nowhere near

Why on earth would I hope we don't stay where we are? Just because we disagree does not mean I want us to fail. You are actually more ridiculous than I thought you were. The fact is we are very likely to not be in the top 3 IF performances remain as they have been for quite some time now. And yes we are actually playing THAT bad. Happy clapper.

No, they actually aren’t playing that bad.
Nowhere near as bad as you’re making out.

sf9944

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 353
Re: That was a hard watch
« Reply #72 on January 01, 2025, 09:53:21 pm by sf9944 »
I agree that the performance wasn't the best but some of the words used to describe it on this thread.....woeful, hopeless, abject etc are a bit over the top....surely?

I think we look strong defensively.  Most of the goals we have conceded recently have been down to mistakes.  We are not as fluid as we were at the back end of last season and start of this but I think a big part of this is that opponents recognise that the best way to beat us is to stop us playing.  I do think we need a bit more quality in midfield though and this is the biggest concern for me at present.

StocksArmy

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 1956
Re: That was a hard watch
« Reply #73 on January 01, 2025, 09:55:33 pm by StocksArmy »
Agreed it’s another really poor performance masked by Billy Sharp doing what Billy Sharp does best. McCann did say he had a team that will go to the very end and that was proven today. A couple of new faces and a win on Saturday could really kickstart the season.

We’re sat in 2nd, the season doesn’t need kickstarting
How many threads do you wanna post on til you realise the performances won’t keep us the? Happy clapper.

You keep saying that, but we’ve got 7 points from 4 games over Xmas.
You keeping hoping it won’t keep us there and let’s just wait and see, we’re nowhere near as bad as you’re making out, nowhere near

Why on earth would I hope we don't stay where we are? Just because we disagree does not mean I want us to fail. You are actually more ridiculous than I thought you were. The fact is we are very likely to not be in the top 3 IF performances remain as they have been for quite some time now. And yes we are actually playing THAT bad. Happy clapper.

No, they actually aren’t playing that bad.
Nowhere near as bad as you’re making out.


The fact that you have just said Tranmere and Walsall was a good perfomance just sums up to me that i will never agree with whatever it is you think you are watching and for that, I will leave you to live in that world you are living in. And i just know you are about to say Im ridiculous because we won.
« Last Edit: January 01, 2025, 09:57:45 pm by StocksArmy »

Ryaldinhio

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 1118
Re: That was a hard watch
« Reply #74 on January 01, 2025, 10:00:40 pm by Ryaldinhio »
I agree that the performance wasn't the best but some of the words used to describe it on this thread.....woeful, hopeless, abject etc are a bit over the top....surely?

I think we look strong defensively.  Most of the goals we have conceded recently have been down to mistakes.  We are not as fluid as we were at the back end of last season and start of this but I think a big part of this is that opponents recognise that the best way to beat us is to stop us playing.  I do think we need a bit more quality in midfield though and this is the biggest concern for me at present.

Steady on pal, all the divvies in here will throw you in the "happy clappers" club  :chair:

Lesonthewest

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 3766
Re: That was a hard watch
« Reply #75 on January 01, 2025, 10:15:20 pm by Lesonthewest »
The negativity is unbelievable on here,
New Year’s Day and 2nd in the table, we would’ve  been over the moon with that in July
True to form your 'negativity' word comes out again. You really seem to struggle with posters having opinions & concerns  regarding performances. Everyone seems to be happy with the league position & the 3 points today I for one am chuffed to bits, the performance however was truly awful.

If you don’t think this thread is negative then I don’t know what else to say,
I didn’t bring up sod, it was more negative drivel regarding performances that brought it up.

Performances are nowhere near as bad as you’re making out, Tranmere was a good performance, first half against Walsall we were good and the first half against Colchester we were very good,
We’ve got 7 points from 4 games.

Exactly, as I said you have trouble understanding other posters concerns & opinions without using the negative slant. I have read nothing on this thread that is negative. Just posters opinions on what they have witnessed, they are allowed, it's a forum.

Performances at home have been below par since September. That performance today was rubbish.


dickos1

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 17804
Re: That was a hard watch
« Reply #76 on January 01, 2025, 10:15:56 pm by dickos1 »
Agreed it’s another really poor performance masked by Billy Sharp doing what Billy Sharp does best. McCann did say he had a team that will go to the very end and that was proven today. A couple of new faces and a win on Saturday could really kickstart the season.

We’re sat in 2nd, the season doesn’t need kickstarting
How many threads do you wanna post on til you realise the performances won’t keep us the? Happy clapper.

You keep saying that, but we’ve got 7 points from 4 games over Xmas.
You keeping hoping it won’t keep us there and let’s just wait and see, we’re nowhere near as bad as you’re making out, nowhere near

Why on earth would I hope we don't stay where we are? Just because we disagree does not mean I want us to fail. You are actually more ridiculous than I thought you were. The fact is we are very likely to not be in the top 3 IF performances remain as they have been for quite some time now. And yes we are actually playing THAT bad. Happy clapper.

No, they actually aren’t playing that bad.
Nowhere near as bad as you’re making out.


The fact that you have just said Tranmere and Walsall was a good perfomance just sums up to me that i will never agree with whatever it is you think you are watching and for that, I will leave you to live in that world you are living in. And i just know you are about to say Im ridiculous because we won.

Most on here also thought Tranmere was a good performance and the first half at Walsall.
You’re pissing and whining about two home games where we won 3-1 and 2-1. It’s astounding

dickos1

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 17804
Re: That was a hard watch
« Reply #77 on January 01, 2025, 10:19:14 pm by dickos1 »
The negativity is unbelievable on here,
New Year’s Day and 2nd in the table, we would’ve  been over the moon with that in July
True to form your 'negativity' word comes out again. You really seem to struggle with posters having opinions & concerns  regarding performances. Everyone seems to be happy with the league position & the 3 points today I for one am chuffed to bits, the performance however was truly awful.

If you don’t think this thread is negative then I don’t know what else to say,
I didn’t bring up sod, it was more negative drivel regarding performances that brought it up.

Performances are nowhere near as bad as you’re making out, Tranmere was a good performance, first half against Walsall we were good and the first half against Colchester we were very good,
We’ve got 7 points from 4 games.

Exactly, as I said you have trouble understanding other posters concerns & opinions without using the negative slant. I have read nothing on this thread that is negative. Just posters opinions on what they have witnessed, they are allowed, it's a forum.

Performances at home have been below par since September. That performance today was rubbish.



As I said previously if you don’t think threads like this are negative then there’s not much else to say.

StocksArmy

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 1956
Re: That was a hard watch
« Reply #78 on January 01, 2025, 10:19:32 pm by StocksArmy »
Agreed it’s another really poor performance masked by Billy Sharp doing what Billy Sharp does best. McCann did say he had a team that will go to the very end and that was proven today. A couple of new faces and a win on Saturday could really kickstart the season.

We’re sat in 2nd, the season doesn’t need kickstarting
How many threads do you wanna post on til you realise the performances won’t keep us the? Happy clapper.

You keep saying that, but we’ve got 7 points from 4 games over Xmas.
You keeping hoping it won’t keep us there and let’s just wait and see, we’re nowhere near as bad as you’re making out, nowhere near

Why on earth would I hope we don't stay where we are? Just because we disagree does not mean I want us to fail. You are actually more ridiculous than I thought you were. The fact is we are very likely to not be in the top 3 IF performances remain as they have been for quite some time now. And yes we are actually playing THAT bad. Happy clapper.

No, they actually aren’t playing that bad.
Nowhere near as bad as you’re making out.


The fact that you have just said Tranmere and Walsall was a good perfomance just sums up to me that i will never agree with whatever it is you think you are watching and for that, I will leave you to live in that world you are living in. And i just know you are about to say Im ridiculous because we won.

Most on here also thought Tranmere was a good performance and the first half at Walsall.
You’re pissing and whining about two home games where we won 3-1 and 2-1. It’s astounding

Do yourself a favour and scroll back through all the posts throughout the season since we lost to Chesterfield before you continue to spout rubbish.

Lesonthewest

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 3766
Re: That was a hard watch
« Reply #79 on January 01, 2025, 10:35:52 pm by Lesonthewest »
Agreed it’s another really poor performance masked by Billy Sharp doing what Billy Sharp does best. McCann did say he had a team that will go to the very end and that was proven today. A couple of new faces and a win on Saturday could really kickstart the season.

We’re sat in 2nd, the season doesn’t need kickstarting
How many threads do you wanna post on til you realise the performances won’t keep us the? Happy clapper.

You keep saying that, but we’ve got 7 points from 4 games over Xmas.
You keeping hoping it won’t keep us there and let’s just wait and see, we’re nowhere near as bad as you’re making out, nowhere near

Why on earth would I hope we don't stay where we are? Just because we disagree does not mean I want us to fail. You are actually more ridiculous than I thought you were. The fact is we are very likely to not be in the top 3 IF performances remain as they have been for quite some time now. And yes we are actually playing THAT bad. Happy clapper.

No, they actually aren’t playing that bad.
Nowhere near as bad as you’re making out.


The fact that you have just said Tranmere and Walsall was a good perfomance just sums up to me that i will never agree with whatever it is you think you are watching and for that, I will leave you to live in that world you are living in. And i just know you are about to say Im ridiculous because we won.

Most on here also thought Tranmere was a good performance and the first half at Walsall.
You’re pissing and whining about two home games where we won 3-1 and 2-1. It’s astounding

Here we go with the play with words like 'astounding' & summising quoting 'most people on here', total supposition. I'll say it again, posters on this thread are happy with the win today & the league position, but are questioning performances, what's 'astounding' about that.

dickos1

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 17804
Re: That was a hard watch
« Reply #80 on January 01, 2025, 10:39:00 pm by dickos1 »
Agreed it’s another really poor performance masked by Billy Sharp doing what Billy Sharp does best. McCann did say he had a team that will go to the very end and that was proven today. A couple of new faces and a win on Saturday could really kickstart the season.

We’re sat in 2nd, the season doesn’t need kickstarting
How many threads do you wanna post on til you realise the performances won’t keep us the? Happy clapper.

You keep saying that, but we’ve got 7 points from 4 games over Xmas.
You keeping hoping it won’t keep us there and let’s just wait and see, we’re nowhere near as bad as you’re making out, nowhere near

Why on earth would I hope we don't stay where we are? Just because we disagree does not mean I want us to fail. You are actually more ridiculous than I thought you were. The fact is we are very likely to not be in the top 3 IF performances remain as they have been for quite some time now. And yes we are actually playing THAT bad. Happy clapper.

No, they actually aren’t playing that bad.
Nowhere near as bad as you’re making out.


The fact that you have just said Tranmere and Walsall was a good perfomance just sums up to me that i will never agree with whatever it is you think you are watching and for that, I will leave you to live in that world you are living in. And i just know you are about to say Im ridiculous because we won.

Most on here also thought Tranmere was a good performance and the first half at Walsall.
You’re pissing and whining about two home games where we won 3-1 and 2-1. It’s astounding

Do yourself a favour and scroll back through all the posts throughout the season since we lost to Chesterfield before you continue to spout rubbish.
Bradford away, notts county, Fleetwood away, all good performances in addition to the ones I mentioned earlier

dickos1

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 17804
Re: That was a hard watch
« Reply #81 on January 01, 2025, 10:42:45 pm by dickos1 »
Agreed it’s another really poor performance masked by Billy Sharp doing what Billy Sharp does best. McCann did say he had a team that will go to the very end and that was proven today. A couple of new faces and a win on Saturday could really kickstart the season.

We’re sat in 2nd, the season doesn’t need kickstarting
How many threads do you wanna post on til you realise the performances won’t keep us the? Happy clapper.

You keep saying that, but we’ve got 7 points from 4 games over Xmas.
You keeping hoping it won’t keep us there and let’s just wait and see, we’re nowhere near as bad as you’re making out, nowhere near

Why on earth would I hope we don't stay where we are? Just because we disagree does not mean I want us to fail. You are actually more ridiculous than I thought you were. The fact is we are very likely to not be in the top 3 IF performances remain as they have been for quite some time now. And yes we are actually playing THAT bad. Happy clapper.

No, they actually aren’t playing that bad.
Nowhere near as bad as you’re making out.


The fact that you have just said Tranmere and Walsall was a good perfomance just sums up to me that i will never agree with whatever it is you think you are watching and for that, I will leave you to live in that world you are living in. And i just know you are about to say Im ridiculous because we won.

Most on here also thought Tranmere was a good performance and the first half at Walsall.
You’re pissing and whining about two home games where we won 3-1 and 2-1. It’s astounding

Here we go with the play with words like 'astounding' & summising quoting 'most people on here', total supposition. I'll say it again, posters on this thread are happy with the win today & the league position, but are questioning performances, what's 'astounding' about that.

Of course they’re happy, you can’t pretend to support a football club and then portray yourself as being unhappy with a win.
But the fact it’s the same old people year in year out being negative, even after the 5th best calendar year in the clubs entire history. Then it becomes pretty evident that they’re only happy when they’re being negative

Lesonthewest

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 3766
Re: That was a hard watch
« Reply #82 on January 01, 2025, 10:54:07 pm by Lesonthewest »
Agreed it’s another really poor performance masked by Billy Sharp doing what Billy Sharp does best. McCann did say he had a team that will go to the very end and that was proven today. A couple of new faces and a win on Saturday could really kickstart the season.

We’re sat in 2nd, the season doesn’t need kickstarting
How many threads do you wanna post on til you realise the performances won’t keep us the? Happy clapper.

You keep saying that, but we’ve got 7 points from 4 games over Xmas.
You keeping hoping it won’t keep us there and let’s just wait and see, we’re nowhere near as bad as you’re making out, nowhere near

Why on earth would I hope we don't stay where we are? Just because we disagree does not mean I want us to fail. You are actually more ridiculous than I thought you were. The fact is we are very likely to not be in the top 3 IF performances remain as they have been for quite some time now. And yes we are actually playing THAT bad. Happy clapper.

No, they actually aren’t playing that bad.
Nowhere near as bad as you’re making out.


The fact that you have just said Tranmere and Walsall was a good perfomance just sums up to me that i will never agree with whatever it is you think you are watching and for that, I will leave you to live in that world you are living in. And i just know you are about to say Im ridiculous because we won.

Most on here also thought Tranmere was a good performance and the first half at Walsall.
You’re pissing and whining about two home games where we won 3-1 and 2-1. It’s astounding

Do yourself a favour and scroll back through all the posts throughout the season since we lost to Chesterfield before you continue to spout rubbish.
Bradford away, notts county, Fleetwood away, all good performances in addition to the ones I mentioned earlier

The home games since September?

Lesonthewest

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 3766
Re: That was a hard watch
« Reply #83 on January 01, 2025, 11:03:53 pm by Lesonthewest »
Agreed it’s another really poor performance masked by Billy Sharp doing what Billy Sharp does best. McCann did say he had a team that will go to the very end and that was proven today. A couple of new faces and a win on Saturday could really kickstart the season.

We’re sat in 2nd, the season doesn’t need kickstarting
How many threads do you wanna post on til you realise the performances won’t keep us the? Happy clapper.

You keep saying that, but we’ve got 7 points from 4 games over Xmas.
You keeping hoping it won’t keep us there and let’s just wait and see, we’re nowhere near as bad as you’re making out, nowhere near

Why on earth would I hope we don't stay where we are? Just because we disagree does not mean I want us to fail. You are actually more ridiculous than I thought you were. The fact is we are very likely to not be in the top 3 IF performances remain as they have been for quite some time now. And yes we are actually playing THAT bad. Happy clapper.

No, they actually aren’t playing that bad.
Nowhere near as bad as you’re making out.


The fact that you have just said Tranmere and Walsall was a good perfomance just sums up to me that i will never agree with whatever it is you think you are watching and for that, I will leave you to live in that world you are living in. And i just know you are about to say Im ridiculous because we won.

Most on here also thought Tranmere was a good performance and the first half at Walsall.
You’re pissing and whining about two home games where we won 3-1 and 2-1. It’s astounding

Here we go with the play with words like 'astounding' & summising quoting 'most people on here', total supposition. I'll say it again, posters on this thread are happy with the win today & the league position, but are questioning performances, what's 'astounding' about that.

Of course they’re happy, you can’t pretend to support a football club and then portray yourself as being unhappy with a win.
But the fact it’s the same old people year in year out being negative, even after the 5th best calendar year in the clubs entire history. Then it becomes pretty evident that they’re only happy when they’re being negative

Nope wrong again, it's not about your favourite word 'negativity', it's about posters views on what they have witnessed, that's it. It's a forum. I bet a pound to a penny these 'negative' posters will be there on Saturday fully behind their team again.

dickos1

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 17804
Re: That was a hard watch
« Reply #84 on January 01, 2025, 11:05:52 pm by dickos1 »
Agreed it’s another really poor performance masked by Billy Sharp doing what Billy Sharp does best. McCann did say he had a team that will go to the very end and that was proven today. A couple of new faces and a win on Saturday could really kickstart the season.

We’re sat in 2nd, the season doesn’t need kickstarting
How many threads do you wanna post on til you realise the performances won’t keep us the? Happy clapper.

You keep saying that, but we’ve got 7 points from 4 games over Xmas.
You keeping hoping it won’t keep us there and let’s just wait and see, we’re nowhere near as bad as you’re making out, nowhere near

Why on earth would I hope we don't stay where we are? Just because we disagree does not mean I want us to fail. You are actually more ridiculous than I thought you were. The fact is we are very likely to not be in the top 3 IF performances remain as they have been for quite some time now. And yes we are actually playing THAT bad. Happy clapper.

No, they actually aren’t playing that bad.
Nowhere near as bad as you’re making out.


The fact that you have just said Tranmere and Walsall was a good perfomance just sums up to me that i will never agree with whatever it is you think you are watching and for that, I will leave you to live in that world you are living in. And i just know you are about to say Im ridiculous because we won.

Most on here also thought Tranmere was a good performance and the first half at Walsall.
You’re pissing and whining about two home games where we won 3-1 and 2-1. It’s astounding

Do yourself a favour and scroll back through all the posts throughout the season since we lost to Chesterfield before you continue to spout rubbish.
Bradford away, notts county, Fleetwood away, all good performances in addition to the ones I mentioned earlier

The home games since September?

Your man never mentioned home games, I also missed the Grimsby game out. So in actual fact there have been some very good performances since the chesterfield game.

dickos1

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 17804
Re: That was a hard watch
« Reply #85 on January 01, 2025, 11:06:45 pm by dickos1 »
Agreed it’s another really poor performance masked by Billy Sharp doing what Billy Sharp does best. McCann did say he had a team that will go to the very end and that was proven today. A couple of new faces and a win on Saturday could really kickstart the season.

We’re sat in 2nd, the season doesn’t need kickstarting
How many threads do you wanna post on til you realise the performances won’t keep us the? Happy clapper.

You keep saying that, but we’ve got 7 points from 4 games over Xmas.
You keeping hoping it won’t keep us there and let’s just wait and see, we’re nowhere near as bad as you’re making out, nowhere near

Why on earth would I hope we don't stay where we are? Just because we disagree does not mean I want us to fail. You are actually more ridiculous than I thought you were. The fact is we are very likely to not be in the top 3 IF performances remain as they have been for quite some time now. And yes we are actually playing THAT bad. Happy clapper.

No, they actually aren’t playing that bad.
Nowhere near as bad as you’re making out.


The fact that you have just said Tranmere and Walsall was a good perfomance just sums up to me that i will never agree with whatever it is you think you are watching and for that, I will leave you to live in that world you are living in. And i just know you are about to say Im ridiculous because we won.

Most on here also thought Tranmere was a good performance and the first half at Walsall.
You’re pissing and whining about two home games where we won 3-1 and 2-1. It’s astounding

Here we go with the play with words like 'astounding' & summising quoting 'most people on here', total supposition. I'll say it again, posters on this thread are happy with the win today & the league position, but are questioning performances, what's 'astounding' about that.

Of course they’re happy, you can’t pretend to support a football club and then portray yourself as being unhappy with a win.
But the fact it’s the same old people year in year out being negative, even after the 5th best calendar year in the clubs entire history. Then it becomes pretty evident that they’re only happy when they’re being negative

Nope wrong again, it's not about your favourite word 'negativity', it's about posters views on what they have witnessed, that's it. It's a forum. I bet a pound to a penny these 'negative' posters will be there on Saturday fully behind their team again.


Yep some of them will be and come win, lose or draw you’ll be back here moaning about it

Lesonthewest

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 3766
Re: That was a hard watch
« Reply #86 on January 01, 2025, 11:13:58 pm by Lesonthewest »
Nope, no moaning from me, just commenting on games as I see them, & praising us when we play well.

Ryaldinhio

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 1118
Re: That was a hard watch
« Reply #87 on January 01, 2025, 11:22:09 pm by Ryaldinhio »
Nope, no moaning from me, just commenting on games as I see them, & praising us when we play well.

If we play sh*t all season but get promoted would you be praising us????

StocksArmy

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 1956
Re: That was a hard watch
« Reply #88 on January 01, 2025, 11:27:19 pm by StocksArmy »
I will say it again, I invite you to look back through the entirity of the forum and you will not find me being continually critical or "negative" throughout every post regardless of the result and performance. Just speaking of this season I have maintained that since the Chesterfield defeat a large portion of our home performances have been below what I believe standards should be for a team with ambitions of winning the league and McCann sets us up better away as performances have been really good. If anybody can look at our away performances and say they are not pleased then I would agree with you that they are negative. But you cant argue that home form we have fell short and dropped too many points. Some posters will say when they think weve played well, when weve played sh!t and be even more disgruntled when the team have performed poorly over a period of time. But yet again you just cant hack that.

StocksArmy

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 1956
Re: That was a hard watch
« Reply #89 on January 01, 2025, 11:29:54 pm by StocksArmy »
Nope, no moaning from me, just commenting on games as I see them, & praising us when we play well.

If we play sh*t all season but get promoted would you be praising us????


Thats not even possible.

 

TinyPortal © 2005-2012