0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
It can’t be a coincidence that the top division of womens football is almost a copy of the mens equivalent.
Quote from: drfchound on February 17, 2025, 10:53:14 amIt can’t be a coincidence that the top division of womens football is almost a copy of the mens equivalent.It isn't, it's been engineered as such by the FA, who massively weighted all their criteria for places in the Women's Super League in favour of the big name men's teams.It's great that such huge crowds are going to Arsenal games, but I wouldn't call the current broader structure of women's football a success at all as competitiveness at the top level is still wholly dependent on big investment by men's clubs. And whilst that's the case there's always the very real risk of women's teams being hung out to dry or closed down completely when the men's teams face difficulty/bad ownership – Reading are the latest example, but it's happened lots of times before, at Charlton, Notts County and Fulham.The crowd and the interest in women's football at the top level is brilliant; but there's still a vast amount to be done for the game to thrive outside that.
arksey ..did you not know that that women go to women’s football just like you go to watch the boys or do you live on your own patch of this world only .
Quote from: graingrover on February 17, 2025, 07:10:09 pmarksey ..did you not know that that women go to women’s football just like you go to watch the boys or do you live on your own patch of this world only .I think you're missing arkseyrover's point... and I'm the same as them when it comes to the WSL. I don't really tune into it either – nothing to do with the fact it's women playing football – but because I can't get over how the way it was implemented did for the Belles to be able to be in a position to get invested in it.
At the North London derby between Arsenal women and Quote from: scawsby steve on February 16, 2025, 10:17:07 pmAt the North London derby between Arsenal women and Spurs women.I never thought I'd see an attendance like that in WSL. What a long way women's football has come in the last decade.Well done to everyone involved. Tremendous achievement.The women's game started to get attendances as big as the men's before,the powers that be of the time felt threatened and put a stop to it,disgusting,just another injustice by powerful knobs within football , there is an excellent documentary about it all , if some smarter than me can find it and put a link up , very interesting.
At the North London derby between Arsenal women and Spurs women.I never thought I'd see an attendance like that in WSL. What a long way women's football has come in the last decade.Well done to everyone involved. Tremendous achievement.
Quote from: graingrover on February 17, 2025, 07:10:09 pmarksey ..did you not know that that women go to women’s football just like you go to watch the boys or do you live on your own patch of this world only .The crowd resembles more what you would hear at a sports day. High pitched screaming. The clubs don’t make themselves distinguishable from the men’s for obvious reasons but will always been in their shadow as a result. Rebrand as the Chelsea Chicks/ Arsenal Angels etc
Quote from: VivaRovers on February 17, 2025, 07:25:02 pmQuote from: graingrover on February 17, 2025, 07:10:09 pmarksey ..did you not know that that women go to women’s football just like you go to watch the boys or do you live on your own patch of this world only .I think you're missing arkseyrover's point... and I'm the same as them when it comes to the WSL. I don't really tune into it either – nothing to do with the fact it's women playing football – but because I can't get over how the way it was implemented did for the Belles to be able to be in a position to get invested in it.Sorry, Glen, but I don't think Arksey's point has anything to do with the valid points you quite rightly make.I think Arksey just finds women's football boring, which of course is his prerogative.