0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Think he’s look a good L1 player when he’s played as a 9. Not sure what the plan was with him been stuck out wide to start with was clearly a centre forward. Like us to play him and Ironside together been saying it since he signed but it won’t happen
For who to sign.??
We’ve played two strikers a few times this season and it simply hasn’t worked
What formation do we play to fit two strikers into the side? Probably has to be 352 and then you negate our to scorer and assist maker because he will end up playing wing back and wont get in to the good positions he does do as often.442?? we cant control midfield with three centrally, we would really struggle with 2 in there!
There’s not many strikers as well rounded as Street and Lincoln have him in contract for another 3 years.Good age too so would take a big offer.
Quote from: GazLaz on April 10, 2025, 09:09:57 amWhat formation do we play to fit two strikers into the side? Probably has to be 352 and then you negate our to scorer and assist maker because he will end up playing wing back and wont get in to the good positions he does do as often.442?? we cant control midfield with three centrally, we would really struggle with 2 in there!3-4-1-2 with Moly in the no.10 position or as a striker playing off someone.Could play Gibson 10 too.It’s a formation we could play more if Maxwell wasn’t made of poppadoms.
We really haven't seen the Ironside of last season although I hope that changes if his hernia was holding him back. Even then, Street gives us more options being more mobile covering alot more ground and alot quicker, so for me, I'd go with Street and Sharp as a front two if pushed. Can't see GM starting with two up top, so guessing we'll not see many changes in the starting XI. Maybe McGrath in for Wood. Should be pushing a near 10k attendance tomorrow if the folk of this City really want to get behind the team for the final push.
What formation do we play to fit two strikers into the side? Probably has to be 352 and then you negate our to scorer and assist maker because he will end up playing wing back and wont get in to the good positions he does do as often442?? we cant control midfield with three centrally, we would really struggle with 2 in there![What are you about? quote]
Quote from: GazLaz on April 10, 2025, 09:09:57 amWhat formation do we play to fit two strikers into the side? Probably has to be 352 and then you negate our to scorer and assist maker because he will end up playing wing back and wont get in to the good positions he does do as often.442?? we cant control midfield with three centrally, we would really struggle with 2 in there!I’d try it. Control is a bit overrated anyway. Often leads to more sideways passes than forwards in L2 players. Rather we control the game by scoring goals and playing in the opposition half.If Bailey played centrally next to Broadbent and sat in we’d be fine without the ball. Clifton could play off the left like he did for Grimsby too to tighten it up if needed and let Moly stay higher. The games changed from playing 5 in midfield and trying to keep the ball for the sake of it. The best teams to watch have bodies forward and play quickly. Give me some of that over control.
Being put forward as a credible target to sign when they get promotion by the Yorkshire Post along with Bristol City's Sam Bell and Will Davis from non league Sutton United.
Quote from: selby on April 09, 2025, 09:36:26 pm Being put forward as a credible target to sign when they get promotion by the Yorkshire Post along with Bristol City's Sam Bell and Will Davis from non league Sutton United.Which club are you talking about?Not for the first time, I’m struggling to understand your post.
Quote from: ncRover on April 10, 2025, 09:20:14 amQuote from: GazLaz on April 10, 2025, 09:09:57 amWhat formation do we play to fit two strikers into the side? Probably has to be 352 and then you negate our to scorer and assist maker because he will end up playing wing back and wont get in to the good positions he does do as often.442?? we cant control midfield with three centrally, we would really struggle with 2 in there!3-4-1-2 with Moly in the no.10 position or as a striker playing off someone.Could play Gibson 10 too.It’s a formation we could play more if Maxwell wasn’t made of poppadoms.We played that system at Bradford, NC, with Hurst at no 10.Ripped them apart; performance of the season.
Quote from: sedwardsdrfc on April 10, 2025, 09:06:47 pmQuote from: GazLaz on April 10, 2025, 09:09:57 amWhat formation do we play to fit two strikers into the side? Probably has to be 352 and then you negate our to scorer and assist maker because he will end up playing wing back and wont get in to the good positions he does do as often.442?? we cant control midfield with three centrally, we would really struggle with 2 in there!I’d try it. Control is a bit overrated anyway. Often leads to more sideways passes than forwards in L2 players. Rather we control the game by scoring goals and playing in the opposition half.If Bailey played centrally next to Broadbent and sat in we’d be fine without the ball. Clifton could play off the left like he did for Grimsby too to tighten it up if needed and let Moly stay higher. The games changed from playing 5 in midfield and trying to keep the ball for the sake of it. The best teams to watch have bodies forward and play quickly. Give me some of that over control. You don’t have to have possession to control midfield. You can do it with and without the ball.