Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
December 21, 2025, 11:46:16 pm

Login with username, password and session length

Links


Join the VSC


FSA logo

Author Topic: Maxwell  (Read 4961 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Padge_DRFC

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 5915
Maxwell
« on April 12, 2025, 05:15:32 pm by Padge_DRFC »
Broke a toe, then played, now out again, any news what's up and if ever back?



(want to hide these ads? Join the VSC today!)

GazLaz

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 14890
Re: Maxwell
« Reply #1 on April 12, 2025, 05:16:24 pm by GazLaz »
Broke a toe, then played, now out again, any news what's up and if ever back?

Fit to play according to GM.

ChrisBx

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 1497
Re: Maxwell
« Reply #2 on April 12, 2025, 05:17:12 pm by ChrisBx »
We could do with him. Senior is pretty good defensively, but we really lack attacking width with him and Sterry.

Padge_DRFC

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 5915
Re: Maxwell
« Reply #3 on April 12, 2025, 05:31:56 pm by Padge_DRFC »
Broke a toe, then played, now out again, any news what's up and if ever back?

Fit to play according to GM.

Wow if true shocking he's not playing

i_ateallthepies

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 5753
Re: Maxwell
« Reply #4 on April 12, 2025, 05:32:55 pm by i_ateallthepies »
Senior is a trier but he's anything but good defensively.

oggycompton

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 510
Re: Maxwell
« Reply #5 on April 12, 2025, 05:34:35 pm by oggycompton »
Maxwell should be playing and crew should be playing. I’m sorry but if Clifton and Wood are the answer we have absolutely no chance. Crew as bewildered as I was when I asked him if he was injured and he said no, just not picked.

Ian Nimmo

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 595
Re: Maxwell
« Reply #6 on April 12, 2025, 05:37:34 pm by Ian Nimmo »
Senior improved second half, but thought he was poor in the first due to too many mistakes.

DonnyOsmond

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 12453
Re: Maxwell
« Reply #7 on April 12, 2025, 05:39:32 pm by DonnyOsmond »
Senior isn't a wing back.

Barmby Rover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 5420
Re: Maxwell
« Reply #8 on April 12, 2025, 06:19:57 pm by Barmby Rover »
Senior was transformed in the second half, after GM had spoken to him, he began running down the wing and trying to add into attacks.

redarmi66

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 483
Re: Maxwell
« Reply #9 on April 12, 2025, 06:26:52 pm by redarmi66 »
Broke a toe, then played, now out again, any news what's up and if ever back?

Fit to play according to GM.

Wow if true shocking he's not playing
Well we have 3 games in 7 days coming up. If fit im sure we will see him. This is where the squad needs to be utilised. we have some players who should be fresh for this time of the season!
« Last Edit: April 12, 2025, 06:29:03 pm by redarmi66 »

Goole Rover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 902
Re: Maxwell
« Reply #10 on April 12, 2025, 06:38:58 pm by Goole Rover »
Senior is a trier but he's anything but good defensively.
I agree with I just can’t understand where Chrisbx gets his opinion from.

Usher wide.

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 1119
Re: Maxwell
« Reply #11 on April 12, 2025, 10:17:45 pm by Usher wide. »
Senior was transformed in the second half, after GM had spoken to him, he began running down the wing and trying to add into attacks.

Too little too late given Senior was over on GM’s side of the pitch first half, why wasn’t he given those instructions by GM while the sending off & ‘injury’ to Wombles keeper (which took up all of THREE minutes added on time) were being attended to?

Move DRFC

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 1185
Re: Maxwell
« Reply #12 on April 12, 2025, 11:56:44 pm by Move DRFC »
Maxwell was absolutely levels above league two during that run last season. Him returning as a starter was as important as TLT, Craig, Adelakun etc.

He’s streets ahead of Senior and has to play if he’s fit.

rtid88

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 1490
Re: Maxwell
« Reply #13 on April 13, 2025, 02:01:21 am by rtid88 »
Senior is terrible as a full back. Not sure i have seen him stop a cross. Reasonable going forward but have no idea why he was given a new deal. Very average league 2 player like the vast majority of our squad.

Ryaldinhio

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 1118
Re: Maxwell
« Reply #14 on April 13, 2025, 02:04:24 am by Ryaldinhio »
Senior is terrible as a full back. Not sure i have seen him stop a cross. Reasonable going forward but have no idea why he was given a new deal. Very average league 2 player like the vast majority of our squad.

Versatility? He was signed as a LCB. We will have McGrath next season, Wood likely gone. So Senior becomes back up LCB amd back up LB?

He isn't first choice but we need a squad.

rtid88

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 1490
Re: Maxwell
« Reply #15 on April 13, 2025, 02:07:37 am by rtid88 »
A decision made on us not going up to League 1? As he certainly isn't League 1 quality?

Jersey Rover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 485
Re: Maxwell
« Reply #16 on April 13, 2025, 02:17:38 pm by Jersey Rover »
Need to look at these positions next season. Maxwell to fragile, never available, Joe maybe/maybe not here next season, Woody coming to the end, TSL loan finished decisions around the other defensive squad players need to be addressed that’s before midfield and up front which also requires an overall. Depending on where we finish, could be a busy summer transfer window.

sedwardsdrfc

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 5056
Re: Maxwell
« Reply #17 on April 13, 2025, 04:39:49 pm by sedwardsdrfc »
Senior is a good squad player for L2. But if Maxwell is actually fit and available it’s stupidity not to play him imo. He’s obviously the better player. Can only hope it’s caution so he’s properly back fit before playing again.

As for Crew it’s just another weird decision with our midfielders. Sign up Close & Westbrooke and dump them immediately. Sign Kelly and eventually stop playing him. Drop Broadbent for the loanee but eventually realise he’s better. Sign an apparently prodigy in Crew, the way he was talked about, barely play him. TB must shudder when GM says he needs to sign a midfielder. How much money to someone who won’t play this time!?

GazLaz

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 14890
Re: Maxwell
« Reply #18 on April 13, 2025, 04:42:57 pm by GazLaz »
Senior is a good squad player for L2. But if Maxwell is actually fit and available it’s stupidity not to play him imo. He’s obviously the better player. Can only hope it’s caution so he’s properly back fit before playing again.

As for Crew it’s just another weird decision with our midfielders. Sign up Close & Westbrooke and dump them immediately. Sign Kelly and eventually stop playing him. Drop Broadbent for the loanee but eventually realise he’s better. Sign an apparently prodigy in Crew, the way he was talked about, barely play him. TB must shudder when GM says he needs to sign a midfielder. How much money to someone who won’t play this time!?

It’s like they don’t truly know how good the players they are signing are. Yeboah, Ennis, Crew… zero impact and all got bigged up massively.

ForsolongaRover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 2071
Re: Maxwell
« Reply #19 on April 13, 2025, 06:44:23 pm by ForsolongaRover »
Senior is a good squad player for L2. But if Maxwell is actually fit and available it’s stupidity not to play him imo. He’s obviously the better player. Can only hope it’s caution so he’s properly back fit before playing again.

As for Crew it’s just another weird decision with our midfielders. Sign up Close & Westbrooke and dump them immediately. Sign Kelly and eventually stop playing him. Drop Broadbent for the loanee but eventually realise he’s better. Sign an apparently prodigy in Crew, the way he was talked about, barely play him. TB must shudder when GM says he needs to sign a midfielder. How much money to someone who won’t play this time!?

It’s like they don’t truly know how good the players they are signing are. Yeboah, Ennis, Crew… zero impact and all got bigged up massively.

It’s another strange quirk of the McCann management system. You sign loanees knowing that they have little experience in men’s football. But the objective is to utilise potential talent which exceeds that of the players you already have in their positions. Surely it’s then a risk/reward situation. And you could interpret McCann’s lack of use of Crew and more recently of Kelly as a fear of taking a risk for a reward. When you think of the mediocrity that he tolerates from some of his regular “safe” substitutions, it is difficult to admire his style.

monkeytennis

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 629
Re: Maxwell
« Reply #20 on April 13, 2025, 08:47:14 pm by monkeytennis »
Senior is terrible as a full back. Not sure i have seen him stop a cross. Reasonable going forward but have no idea why he was given a new deal. Very average league 2 player like the vast majority of our squad.

Yes this, watched opposition players trot past him twice yesterday and put a cross in. Second half he made some great runs and has real pace too.

Goole Rover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 902
Re: Maxwell
« Reply #21 on April 13, 2025, 08:54:23 pm by Goole Rover »
Senior is terrible as a full back. Not sure i have seen him stop a cross. Reasonable going forward but have no idea why he was given a new deal. Very average league 2 player like the vast majority of our squad.

Yes this, watched opposition players trot past him twice yesterday and put a cross in. Second half he made some great runs and has real pace too.
Good going forward but a liability in defence.

drfchound

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 34715
Re: Maxwell
« Reply #22 on April 13, 2025, 08:57:03 pm by drfchound »
Senior is terrible as a full back. Not sure i have seen him stop a cross. Reasonable going forward but have no idea why he was given a new deal. Very average league 2 player like the vast majority of our squad.

Yes this, watched opposition players trot past him twice yesterday and put a cross in. Second half he made some great runs and has real pace too.

He did make some great runs down the left but invariably our lads hardly ever got themselves into good positions to receive a good ball from him which left him very few decent options and more often than not he had to play square or backwards.

dickos1

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 17804
Re: Maxwell
« Reply #23 on April 13, 2025, 09:54:13 pm by dickos1 »
Senior is a good squad player for L2. But if Maxwell is actually fit and available it’s stupidity not to play him imo. He’s obviously the better player. Can only hope it’s caution so he’s properly back fit before playing again.

As for Crew it’s just another weird decision with our midfielders. Sign up Close & Westbrooke and dump them immediately. Sign Kelly and eventually stop playing him. Drop Broadbent for the loanee but eventually realise he’s better. Sign an apparently prodigy in Crew, the way he was talked about, barely play him. TB must shudder when GM says he needs to sign a midfielder. How much money to someone who won’t play this time!?

It’s like they don’t truly know how good the players they are signing are. Yeboah, Ennis, Crew… zero impact and all got bigged up massively.

It’s another strange quirk of the McCann management system. You sign loanees knowing that they have little experience in men’s football. But the objective is to utilise potential talent which exceeds that of the players you already have in their positions. Surely it’s then a risk/reward situation. And you could interpret McCann’s lack of use of Crew and more recently of Kelly as a fear of taking a risk for a reward. When you think of the mediocrity that he tolerates from some of his regular “safe” substitutions, it is difficult to admire his style.

You really don’t like McCann do you?
We’ve signed a few players over the years with little or no league experience,
Maxwell, McGrath, craig, Kane, Bailey, molyneux, hurst, Lo-Tutala, Wilks, Broadbent, being the best of them.
It’s definitely a risk worth taking if we get some of these along the way

Pancho Regan

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 4349
Re: Maxwell
« Reply #24 on April 13, 2025, 11:15:12 pm by Pancho Regan »
I hate to be a purveyor of doom but I seriously worry whether Maxwell will ever get back to his best.

He has a metal screw in his foot which pre-dates all his foot problems this season and is a legacy from his foot fracture last season.

I really hope I’m wrong but I’ve been worried about his fitness for months now.

steve@dcfd

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 10076
Re: Maxwell
« Reply #25 on April 14, 2025, 08:00:02 am by steve@dcfd »
The first half when Wimbledon had 11 men Senior had to stay further back as they had two men coming down the right side. Their goal came from Wood coming out to defend on the left but unfortunately Anderson came across to leave us open in the middle. The situation eased when they went to 10 men.
It also doesn’t help when Senior has Gibson infront of him as he goes inside and doesn’t come back often to double up.
Second half Senior was going forward more and it was him that put in the odd “left” foot cross because Gibson doesn’t or can’t.
So when Maxwell is fit and plays 100% then we look a better attacking force. The problem is we’ve not seen that from him this season either because of fitness or we don’t have a Craig or Adelulaken around him both players or their equivalent we have missed.
« Last Edit: April 14, 2025, 08:02:45 am by steve@dcfd »

ForsolongaRover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 2071
Re: Maxwell
« Reply #26 on April 14, 2025, 10:43:12 am by ForsolongaRover »
Senior is a good squad player for L2. But if Maxwell is actually fit and available it’s stupidity not to play him imo. He’s obviously the better player. Can only hope it’s caution so he’s properly back fit before playing again.

As for Crew it’s just another weird decision with our midfielders. Sign up Close & Westbrooke and dump them immediately. Sign Kelly and eventually stop playing him. Drop Broadbent for the loanee but eventually realise he’s better. Sign an apparently prodigy in Crew, the way he was talked about, barely play him. TB must shudder when GM says he needs to sign a midfielder. How much money to someone who won’t play this time!?

It’s like they don’t truly know how good the players they are signing are. Yeboah, Ennis, Crew… zero impact and all got bigged up massively.

It’s another strange quirk of the McCann management system. You sign loanees knowing that they have little experience in men’s football. But the objective is to utilise potential talent which exceeds that of the players you already have in their positions. Surely it’s then a risk/reward situation. And you could interpret McCann’s lack of use of Crew and more recently of Kelly as a fear of taking a risk for a reward. When you think of the mediocrity that he tolerates from some of his regular “safe” substitutions, it is difficult to admire his style.

You really don’t like McCann do you?
We’ve signed a few players over the years with little or no league experience,
Maxwell, McGrath, craig, Kane, Bailey, molyneux, hurst, Lo-Tutala, Wilks, Broadbent, being the best of them.
It’s definitely a risk worth taking if we get some of these along the way

Why suggest I do not like McCann? What bearing does that have on the point I am making? I can question someone’s decision-making or point of view irrespective of whether I like them or not. My point is about providing loanees with opportunities. I don’t understand how your comment relates to that.

dickos1

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 17804
Re: Maxwell
« Reply #27 on April 14, 2025, 11:09:19 am by dickos1 »
Because almost every post you have made over the last 20 months or so is tinged in negativity towards him.
It’s a pretty obvious observation

Alan Southstand

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 8482
Re: Maxwell
« Reply #28 on April 14, 2025, 11:52:12 am by Alan Southstand »
Steve@dcfd:

It also doesn’t help when Senior has Gibson infront of him as he goes inside and doesn’t come back often to double up.

Absolutely bang on the money, which is why some people have suggested Gibson as a 2nd striker, rather than a winger. GM would have to change to a 3-5-2 but we’ve only got 3 centre backs and 2 of them aren’t 100%. And, we’d need Maxwell back firing on all cylinders.

scawsby steve

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 9753
Re: Maxwell
« Reply #29 on April 14, 2025, 05:25:35 pm by scawsby steve »
Senior is better as a LCB, particularly in a back 3, as evidenced at Bradford.

He's excellent in the air.

 

TinyPortal © 2005-2012