0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I want Billy to sign again and he wants to extend his stay too as I guess most fans do. But the counter argument also needs airing which is, can it be right to put a League One contract offer out to a player who because of old father tune is only likely to be utilised as an impact player/bench option? Then again and I’m contradicting myself again here Billy’s a proven goal getter and their signatures tend to cost more in salary. The other logical question is would Billy accept a lesser contract to reflect his potential game time as he’s a senior pro now. I’m quite sure at this stage of his career he’s well set financially and may well sign a lesser monetary contract to play on as he’s has stated wants to continue into his 40’s.
I remember a comment by the Accrington manager back in August in a post match interview talking about his team trying to get back into the game in the second half and he said “…..and then they bring on Billy Sharp”.Billy coming off the bench for us must be horrible for opposition teams.
I think the real elephant in the room is will we have the budget to compete the way Grant has already said (in public) we will.He’s already said we don’t have one of the top budgets this season in the league below.And gut feeling is L1 is probably a lot stronger than when we were last there.I really hope we can match his ambitions. I believe he took a step back into L2 as a short term risk, he will want to kick on now and has said so.Probably discussion for another day, we’ve a league title to win.
Quote from: drfchound on April 28, 2025, 08:20:26 pmI remember a comment by the Accrington manager back in August in a post match interview talking about his team trying to get back into the game in the second half and he said “…..and then they bring on Billy Sharp”.Billy coming off the bench for us must be horrible for opposition teams.We’ll be playing better teams than Accrington and 10 man Bradford.Ironside is under contract. If Sharp signs then that’s only space for one other main striker.If that new main striker gets injured we’re potentially (depending on other business) having the same attacking problems we’ve had this year but in a harder league.Need 2 new strikers.
Quote from: mushRTID on April 28, 2025, 08:22:10 pmI think the real elephant in the room is will we have the budget to compete the way Grant has already said (in public) we will.He’s already said we don’t have one of the top budgets this season in the league below.And gut feeling is L1 is probably a lot stronger than when we were last there.I really hope we can match his ambitions. I believe he took a step back into L2 as a short term risk, he will want to kick on now and has said so.Probably discussion for another day, we’ve a league title to win.Fair point Mush, but i remember Gavin at one of the recent MTO saying how we would be much better off financially if we were in League 1. Im sure we will have a decent budget to compete with.
Quote from: ncRover on April 28, 2025, 08:25:17 pmQuote from: drfchound on April 28, 2025, 08:20:26 pmI remember a comment by the Accrington manager back in August in a post match interview talking about his team trying to get back into the game in the second half and he said “…..and then they bring on Billy Sharp”.Billy coming off the bench for us must be horrible for opposition teams.We’ll be playing better teams than Accrington and 10 man Bradford.Ironside is under contract. If Sharp signs then that’s only space for one other main striker.If that new main striker gets injured we’re potentially (depending on other business) having the same attacking problems we’ve had this year but in a harder league.Need 2 new strikers.We'll be playing better teams than Accrington and 10-man Bradford BECAUSE of Billy Sharp.
Probably an unpopular opinion but I'd be letting Ironside go.
Quote from: Nudga on April 28, 2025, 08:49:17 pmProbably an unpopular opinion but I'd be letting Ironside go.Absolutely not, play him regularly and he will provide the goods.Don’t forget he has proved he can score goals in L1, playing in a relatively poor side.
Joe Ironside doesn’t have Rob Street’s pace & mobility however, he does hold the ball up better (he’s strong & ‘clever’ with the ball at his feet & back to goal) & with ‘a runner’ close by he would be a very effective No.9 still in Lg1 in my opinion.Let’s remember Rob Street, as much as we might love him to be, is not our player and given the successful period he’s had with us this season I fully expect him to be turning out against us next season in Lincoln colours.So that leaves us with Joe & possibly Billy as one pairing up front (should we ever play two up under GM) & on that note I would look to offer Sharp a deal AND keep Joe. Surely ‘we can afford’ that while still looking for other options up front in the ‘Rob Street vain’?Anything is possible between now & next August. I’m only looking at the ‘here & now’.