0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: mushRTID on November 08, 2025, 11:59:25 pmQuote from: Sammy Chung was King on November 08, 2025, 09:24:38 pmHamlin looked good for the time he was on. He looked a bit of a nuisance, hard to knock off the ball. Probably needs longer on the pitch.Is this a wind up?He’s absolutely useless.The more the weeks go by the more pissed off I’m getting about our strikers recruitment. It’s not good enough. Get rid of Lasagne and Hanlan in January. Both offering us nothing.He’s played 252 mins of league football and started 2 games. Massively extreme opinions on him are probably slightly premature.
Quote from: Sammy Chung was King on November 08, 2025, 09:24:38 pmHamlin looked good for the time he was on. He looked a bit of a nuisance, hard to knock off the ball. Probably needs longer on the pitch.Is this a wind up?He’s absolutely useless.The more the weeks go by the more pissed off I’m getting about our strikers recruitment. It’s not good enough. Get rid of Lasagne and Hanlan in January. Both offering us nothing.
Hamlin looked good for the time he was on. He looked a bit of a nuisance, hard to knock off the ball. Probably needs longer on the pitch.
When it comes to criticising the attacking recruitment, I guess the Hanlan business is an easier target than the Sharp business - who also signed a new contract in the summer and has played far more minutes.Had we not offered Billy one, we would have had another option to fill a striking slot with someone more appropriate.Middleton has also not scored a goal yet and doesn’t have a five page thread. Just feels like Hanlan is getting ganged up on.
I'm in the give Hanlan a chance group, he needs games and a system which allows him to flourish. There's a player in there for me, he's strong and fast, can compete and seems to want to work at it. Going from bench to not even in the squad from week to week can't be helping him, and if we had Rob Street in last seasons form, plus Sharp on the bench then you couldn't argue with that. Sharp is working his nuts off every game but not getting the chances / goals, so surely it's time to try something else. While I'm making a rod for my own back, I also don't think Olusanya is as bad as being made out. Any two of those three, in a team which plays through / over teams would work well, rather than a deep lying team which breaks slowly and puts all it's attacking focus on playing round teams with wide players that can't cross.
Give him the full 90 mins next time v Bradford and then we will see if it’s lack of game time and if his critics are right.
If he signs someone else then maybe the oruginal person misses out. He hasnt really binned them. It gives options if injuries hut and creates competition and it generally enables a big enough squad to have a decent cup run to being the monies in.People are asking him to pick a settlrd team, which means people will be left out and the ones he thinks will play play. Its common with squads, i dont get what you are moaning at, or is it just something else to moan about
Quote from: goalkick on November 09, 2025, 06:22:08 pmGive him the full 90 mins next time v Bradford and then we will see if it’s lack of game time and if his critics are right.Agreed it’s a good chance for the fringe players to show us what they’ve got on Tuesday, give them a start and let’s see who will stand up and be counted, a great opportunity.
All comps...Sharp 4 goals in 1270 mins- A goal every 317minsHanlan- 2 goals on 538 mins- A goal every 269mins
Can't be many on here who actually saw him play on Tuesday night. He was getting into good positions but the end product was woeful. Had a bad first half, and second half wasn't looking much better for him individually. But he kept making runs and getting into good positions. And finally, he took a chance and scored a good goal. Very glad he did!I feel there is a player in there somewhere. But he still looked like he'd need 15 chances to score 1 goal.
Quote from: GazLaz on November 13, 2025, 01:40:35 pmAll comps...Sharp 4 goals in 1270 mins- A goal every 317minsHanlan- 2 goals on 538 mins- A goal every 269minsWOW, those stats really make you sit up don’t they & give a true picture of, of, err…..stuff.So based on those figures, it would only take Hanlan 1076 minutes to score the same number of goals than Billy & he would STILL have 194 minutes in which to score, err……(half of 269 is 134.5, = 0.5 of a goal)…some more!We’ve got a goal machine sat on the bench or in the stands here. What on earth is Grant thinking of!!Thanks for sharing.
Quote from: Usher wide. on November 13, 2025, 04:44:48 pmQuote from: GazLaz on November 13, 2025, 01:40:35 pmAll comps...Sharp 4 goals in 1270 mins- A goal every 317minsHanlan- 2 goals on 538 mins- A goal every 269minsWOW, those stats really make you sit up don’t they & give a true picture of, of, err…..stuff.So based on those figures, it would only take Hanlan 1076 minutes to score the same number of goals than Billy & he would STILL have 194 minutes in which to score, err……(half of 269 is 134.5, = 0.5 of a goal)…some more!We’ve got a goal machine sat on the bench or in the stands here. What on earth is Grant thinking of!!Thanks for sharing.You are a very strange gentleman. I’m not saying BH is good, bad or indifferent. Not saying he should play or shouldn’t play.
Banjo Brandon's air shot on Tuesday night rather endorsed the nick name but he was a right handful in the 2nd half and a defender's nightmare. His delightful redeeming goal should have given him confidence. A player with his strength in possession of the ball is an asset we have lacked since we lost Ironside.
One league goal so far this season for Tranmere. Subbed off in his last two league appearances. Have won 1 in last 10 league games so he has joined a sinking ship there. Hard yards.