0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Completely agree. Loud and proud. It wasn’t a perfect performance but, we were the better team. Hanlan, take a bow, did well today. Not finished article but this will help him. Starts above BS for me. Yes we should have scored but let’s keep positive
Quote from: Spilsby Red on November 22, 2025, 05:22:56 pmCompletely agree. Loud and proud. It wasn’t a perfect performance but, we were the better team. Hanlan, take a bow, did well today. Not finished article but this will help him. Starts above BS for me. Yes we should have scored but let’s keep positive Our very recent performances have been winnable and the only difference today was a centre forward who finally got his chance to put himself about . BUT ., the question I have is why has Hanlan only now been allowed to play his part when the damage is done placing more pressure on him to score . It’s bad enough that we have to loan a striker most seasons along with a goal keeper , two of the most important positions on the pitch, but to our own signing being sidelined without explanation for nearly 3 months of the season is perplexing!!
We were worse again after the subs. Going from a 3 man midfield to a 2 man midfield let them into the game a bit, although they don’t really look a threat. I would say for this bid strong squad we have, the treat from the bench tends to be nonexistent.
I believe Clifton should have stayed on, he didn’t seem to be tiring and was actively involved in the game.Correct to take Gibson off, because he was losing the ball too easy and had gone quiet with his involvement.Yet again the team worked very hard agin today and realistically it should have been a good win, so only inquest from today is again, why have we not managed to score with a performance like that!
If Stevenage win their games in hand, they'll be clear League 1 leaders.That was an impressive away point today.
Quote from: GazLaz on November 22, 2025, 07:56:04 pmWe were worse again after the subs. Going from a 3 man midfield to a 2 man midfield let them into the game a bit, although they don’t really look a threat. I would say for this bid strong squad we have, the treat from the bench tends to be nonexistent. we didn’t really go to a 2 man midfield as sharp come on and played deeper role rather than a striker
Quote from: donnievic on November 22, 2025, 08:23:10 pmQuote from: GazLaz on November 22, 2025, 07:56:04 pmWe were worse again after the subs. Going from a 3 man midfield to a 2 man midfield let them into the game a bit, although they don’t really look a threat. I would say for this bid strong squad we have, the treat from the bench tends to be nonexistent. we didn’t really go to a 2 man midfield as sharp come on and played deeper role rather than a striker Sharp came on as a No10. He did drop a bit deeper but contributed absolutely zero from a midfield perspective.
Quote from: scawsby steve on November 22, 2025, 08:51:59 pmIf Stevenage win their games in hand, they'll be clear League 1 leaders.That was an impressive away point today.Exactly Steve.
Quote from: Pancho Regan on November 22, 2025, 08:54:17 pmQuote from: scawsby steve on November 22, 2025, 08:51:59 pmIf Stevenage win their games in hand, they'll be clear League 1 leaders.That was an impressive away point today.Exactly Steve.There were times when we made them look very much second best. Played with real determination & as a collective. It's coming.
Quote from: donnievic on November 22, 2025, 08:23:10 pmQuote from: GazLaz on November 22, 2025, 07:56:04 pmWe were worse again after the subs. Going from a 3 man midfield to a 2 man midfield let them into the game a bit, although they don’t really look a threat. I would say for this bid strong squad we have, the treat from the bench tends to be nonexistent. we didn’t really go to a 2 man midfield as sharp come on and played deeper role rather than a striker Perhaps that’s because he’s not a midfielder…..doh.Sharp came on as a No10. He did drop a bit deeper but contributed absolutely zero from a midfield perspective.
Quote from: GazLaz on November 22, 2025, 09:05:39 pmQuote from: donnievic on November 22, 2025, 08:23:10 pmQuote from: GazLaz on November 22, 2025, 07:56:04 pmWe were worse again after the subs. Going from a 3 man midfield to a 2 man midfield let them into the game a bit, although they don’t really look a threat. I would say for this bid strong squad we have, the treat from the bench tends to be nonexistent. we didn’t really go to a 2 man midfield as sharp come on and played deeper role rather than a striker Sharp came on as a No10. He did drop a bit deeper but contributed absolutely zero from a midfield perspective.Perhaps that’s because he’s not a midfielder…..doh.
Thought Crew might have come on for Clifton. His ability to break lines may have made the difference
Quote from: 5minstogo on November 22, 2025, 10:47:53 pmThought Crew might have come on for Clifton. His ability to break lines may have made the differenceThat isn’t Crew’s position though.Then if you take Bailey off there’s a loss of goal threat.And then if you take Broadbent off, there’s a loss of size, durability and defensive nous that could leave us wide open.I don’t think he’s the best use of a loan spot at the moment. Josh Stokes at Bristol City, an attacking midfielder is a terrific player. He might get loaned out to this level again because he’s been out with injury.