Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 10, 2026, 05:13:50 am

Login with username, password and session length

Links


Join the VSC


FSA logo

Author Topic: Ian Huntley  (Read 725 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

scawsby steve

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 10095
Ian Huntley
« on February 26, 2026, 09:13:00 pm by scawsby steve »
I reckon someone has done us all a massive favour and looked the other way.



(want to hide these ads? Join the VSC today!)

Nudga

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 6849
Re: Ian Huntley
« Reply #1 on February 26, 2026, 09:19:41 pm by Nudga »
I hope he makes a full and speedy recovery.










And then someone smashes the Kitson in again to within an inch of his life.

IDM

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 21500
Re: Ian Huntley
« Reply #2 on February 26, 2026, 09:31:10 pm by IDM »
I’m surprised it’s taken this long.

Whilst I wouldn’t encourage such violence, I can understand it.

mugnapper

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 3445
Re: Ian Huntley
« Reply #3 on February 27, 2026, 10:53:15 am by mugnapper »
I just hope the metal pole didn't get damaged in the attack.

i_ateallthepies

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 5888
Re: Ian Huntley
« Reply #4 on February 27, 2026, 12:53:54 pm by i_ateallthepies »
I hope he makes a full and speedy recovery.










And then someone smashes the Kitson in again to within an inch of his life.

And again, and again, and again...

Prez

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 1823
Re: Ian Huntley
« Reply #5 on March 07, 2026, 10:43:20 am by Prez »
Confirmed the scumbag is dead. Good start to the day.

scawsby steve

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 10095
Re: Ian Huntley
« Reply #6 on March 07, 2026, 08:06:30 pm by scawsby steve »
Justice has finally been done.

drfchound

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 35153
Re: Ian Huntley
« Reply #7 on March 07, 2026, 08:41:49 pm by drfchound »
I reckon that the bloke who did the damage will be a hero in that nick.

ChrisBx

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 1585
Re: Ian Huntley
« Reply #8 on March 08, 2026, 01:24:27 am by ChrisBx »
I reckon that the bloke who did the damage will be a hero in that nick.

He's no better.

BobG

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 11437
Re: Ian Huntley
« Reply #9 on March 08, 2026, 02:11:16 am by BobG »
Vigilantism on the march....
« Last Edit: March 08, 2026, 10:51:54 pm by BobG »

SydneyRover

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 18928
Re: Ian Huntley
« Reply #10 on March 08, 2026, 04:38:54 am by SydneyRover »
And what happens when an innocent person is jailed, that never happens aye?

Rules based order or ..........

drfchound

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 35153
Re: Ian Huntley
« Reply #11 on March 08, 2026, 08:10:44 am by drfchound »
I reckon that the bloke who did the damage will be a hero in that nick.

He's no better.

I’m not condoning it, just saying what might be.
They are some of the most dangerous prisoners in the UK in there so who knows what their mindsets might be.

drfchound

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 35153
Re: Ian Huntley
« Reply #12 on March 08, 2026, 08:21:29 am by drfchound »
And what happens when an innocent person is jailed, that never happens aye?

Just for interest, Huntley admitted to the murders in this case and to the burning of the bodies of those two young innocent girls.

scawsby steve

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 10095
Re: Ian Huntley
« Reply #13 on March 08, 2026, 07:43:07 pm by scawsby steve »
Vigilanteism on the march....

Well done, Bob. If you want to show empathy and compassion to scumbags who murder innocent little children, then dip your bread. Me, I'm just glad that the taxpayer no longer has to fund 3 meals a day for the worthless b*st*rd.

My only regret is that I wasn't able to do the job myself.

Just as an addendum, vigilanteism happens when your law and order system is crap, and people don't feel protected.

BobG

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 11437
Re: Ian Huntley
« Reply #14 on March 08, 2026, 10:51:31 pm by BobG »
Thanks Steve. I thought a bit of rules based thinking would get your full support. Thanks again


BobG

SydneyRover

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 18928
Re: Ian Huntley
« Reply #15 on March 08, 2026, 11:28:39 pm by SydneyRover »
A summary of the Bichard Inquiry, in light of mistakes made before the murders.

https://pdf4pro.com/fullscreen/the-bichard-inquiry-report-a-summary-reconstruct-68e3b7.html

For those advocating an 'eye for an eye' (Sharia Law) style justice please read and give a response.



« Last Edit: March 08, 2026, 11:34:42 pm by SydneyRover »

SydneyRover

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 18928
Re: Ian Huntley
« Reply #16 on March 09, 2026, 12:29:11 am by SydneyRover »
More footnotes ...

The last persons to be hanged in the UK was 1964, one of whom had 'serious psychological problems'

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_John_Alan_West#Aftermath

Hanging was suspended for murder in 1965. (an unfortunate description)

Abolition of hanging 1969.

Flogging was abolished in the British army in 1881.

Flogging was abolished for criminal offenses in 1948.

''The last birching sentence in Guernsey was carried out in 1968. The Corporal Punishment (Guernsey) Law, 1957 was finally repealed by the Criminal Justice (Miscellaneous Provisions) (Bailiwick of Guernsey) Law, 2006''

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judicial_corporal_punishment#United_Kingdom

''Corporal punishment in British state schools, and also in private schools receiving any element of public funding, was banned by parliament in 1987. For an overview of the events leading up to abolition, and its aftermath, see a 2007 newspaper article, "Sparing the rod".

 In the remaining private schools it was banned in 1999 in England and Wales, 2000 in Scotland, and 2003 in Northern Ireland. Most had anticipated the legislation and abandoned CP voluntarily several years earlier. A few Christian private schools held out, and fought the ban through the courts, ultimately without success''

https://www.corpun.com/counuks.htm

The good old days, hmmm

SydneyRover

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 18928
Re: Ian Huntley
« Reply #17 on March 09, 2026, 12:47:22 am by SydneyRover »
And more ...

''This article examines the abolition of corporal punishment in British state schools as a case study in the impact of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) on campaigning for law reform and social change. In a case supported by the National Council for Civil Liberties and the anti-corporal punishment organisation STOPP, the European Court of Human Rights ruled that the administration of corporal punishment in Scottish schools did not respect parents’ rights to ensure that their children were educated in a way that reflected their values. The decision, and the Thatcher government’s attempts at minimal compliance with it, fractured support for corporal punishment among teachers’ unions and re-framed the contest between activist groups and the state. The article sets corporal punishment in the context of contests over progressive education and conceptions of childhood in the wake of the ‘permissive society’, and uses the case of Campbell and Cosans v United Kingdom to show how the use of litigation in international courts changed the dynamics of domestic contests. The imperative to remain a member of the Council of Europe overrode the Thatcher government’s ideological, and affective, investments in traditional discipline.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13619462.2025.2597771#abstract

scawsby steve

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 10095
Re: Ian Huntley
« Reply #18 on March 09, 2026, 06:28:51 pm by scawsby steve »
Thanks Steve. I thought a bit of rules based thinking would get your full support. Thanks again


BobG

No problem, Bob. My mate was a prison warden for 20 years at Wakefield, where all the human scum of the world are kept, and they had a lot of rules based thinking when it came to nonces; they looked the other way.

That's when real justice happens, not 3 meals a day, pool tables, and wide screen TV.

drfchound

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 35153
Re: Ian Huntley
« Reply #19 on March 09, 2026, 06:43:45 pm by drfchound »
A summary of the Bichard Inquiry, in light of mistakes made before the murders.

https://pdf4pro.com/fullscreen/the-bichard-inquiry-report-a-summary-reconstruct-68e3b7.html

For those advocating an 'eye for an eye' (Sharia Law) style justice please read and give a response.

More footnotes ...

The last persons to be hanged in the UK was 1964, one of whom had 'serious psychological problems'

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_John_Alan_West#Aftermath

Hanging was suspended for murder in 1965. (an unfortunate description)

Abolition of hanging 1969.

Flogging was abolished in the British army in 1881.

Flogging was abolished for criminal offenses in 1948.

''The last birching sentence in Guernsey was carried out in 1968. The Corporal Punishment (Guernsey) Law, 1957 was finally repealed by the Criminal Justice (Miscellaneous Provisions) (Bailiwick of Guernsey) Law, 2006''

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judicial_corporal_punishment#United_Kingdom

''Corporal punishment in British state schools, and also in private schools receiving any element of public funding, was banned by parliament in 1987. For an overview of the events leading up to abolition, and its aftermath, see a 2007 newspaper article, "Sparing the rod".

 In the remaining private schools it was banned in 1999 in England and Wales, 2000 in Scotland, and 2003 in Northern Ireland. Most had anticipated the legislation and abandoned CP voluntarily several years earlier. A few Christian private schools held out, and fought the ban through the courts, ultimately without success''

https://www.corpun.com/counuks.htm

The good old days, hmmm

Good to see who’s side you are on Syd.
Don’t forget that Huntley admitted the murders, no doubting that he was guilty.
« Last Edit: March 09, 2026, 07:42:08 pm by drfchound »

tommy toes

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 5928
Re: Ian Huntley
« Reply #20 on March 09, 2026, 06:58:20 pm by tommy toes »
You might want to read the link before jumping in hound.
Huntley’s guilt is not what it’s about.

drfchound

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 35153
Re: Ian Huntley
« Reply #21 on March 09, 2026, 07:37:03 pm by drfchound »
You might want to read the link before jumping in hound.
Huntley’s guilt is not what it’s about.

Hi Tommy, I know how SydneyRover operates.

Sprotyrover

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 6468
Re: Ian Huntley
« Reply #22 on March 09, 2026, 07:49:55 pm by Sprotyrover »
We have come on in leaps and bounds since the cane was banned! Not!

scawsby steve

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 10095
Re: Ian Huntley
« Reply #23 on March 09, 2026, 08:14:01 pm by scawsby steve »
OK, guys, I'm obviously to the right on capital punishment, but not so on corporal punishment, the reason being that I was physically abused as a child by my dad and certain teachers.

If someone is bad tempered and aggressive by nature, the last thing they should be given is the legal right to hurt children.

SydneyRover

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 18928
Re: Ian Huntley
« Reply #24 on March 09, 2026, 08:40:19 pm by SydneyRover »
You're also the only right wing socialist I know of scawsby.

scawsby steve

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 10095
Re: Ian Huntley
« Reply #25 on March 09, 2026, 08:43:57 pm by scawsby steve »
You're also the only right wing socialist I know of scawsby.

What's that got to do with capital punishment or corporal punishment?

Stop being stupid.

SydneyRover

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 18928
Re: Ian Huntley
« Reply #26 on March 09, 2026, 09:01:25 pm by SydneyRover »
You're also the only right wing socialist I know of scawsby.

What's that got to do with capital punishment or corporal punishment?

Stop being stupid.

Your position on the political spectrum ... if you look at the links provided, there is evidence there that supports a view that it is the right wing of everything that supports capital and corporal punishment. Look at the countries, politics, religion, that's where support for it lies, not usually on the left, wouldn't you agree?

tommy toes

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 5928
Re: Ian Huntley
« Reply #27 on March 09, 2026, 10:31:38 pm by tommy toes »
When I was at PJGS, Mr Brookes the French teacher, whacked me from behind on the back of my head so hard that it knocked me off my chair and I banged my head on the floor.
I was seeing stars afterwards.
Not a thing was said about it.
Me dad told me to behave mi sen.

Glyn_Wigley

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 12658
Re: Ian Huntley
« Reply #28 on March 09, 2026, 11:52:27 pm by Glyn_Wigley »
And what happens when an innocent person is jailed, that never happens aye?

Just for interest, Huntley admitted to the murders in this case and to the burning of the bodies of those two young innocent girls.

Timothy Evans confessed too.

SydneyRover

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 18928
Re: Ian Huntley
« Reply #29 on Today at 01:43:21 am by SydneyRover »
And what happens when an innocent person is jailed, that never happens aye?

Just for interest, Huntley admitted to the murders in this case and to the burning of the bodies of those two young innocent girls.

Timothy Evans confessed too.


So he did Glyn

During his trial, Evans accused his downstairs neighbour, John Christie, who was the chief prosecution witness in the case against him, of committing the murders.

Three years after Evans's execution, Christie was found to be a serial killer who had murdered several other women in the same house, including his own wife Ethel. Christie was himself sentenced to death, and while awaiting execution, he confessed to having murdered Mrs. Evans. An official inquiry concluded in 1966 that Christie had murdered Evans's daughter Geraldine, and Evans was granted a posthumous pardon. The High Court dismissed proceedings to officially quash Evans's murder conviction in 2004 on the grounds of the cost and resources that would be involved, but acknowledged that Evans did not murder his wife or his daughter, 54 years after his wrongful execution. ...

...''Had the police conducted a thorough search of the garden and found the bones of two previous victims of Christie, the trial of Evans might not have occurred at all''

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timothy_Evans#Trial_and_execution

''The television journalist Ludovic Kennedy's book Ten Rillington Place criticised the police investigation and evidence submitted at the 1950 trial in which Evans was found guilty. This produced another Parliamentary debate in 1961 but still no second inquiry''











 

TinyPortal © 2005-2012