Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 16, 2024, 02:06:41 am

Login with username, password and session length

Links


FSA logo

Author Topic: King Billy  (Read 3045 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

watto-drfc

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 927
King Billy
« on May 18, 2010, 05:22:12 pm by watto-drfc »
at the end of the day it's upto sheffield united who they give permission to to talk to King Billy as he is under contract.
if as the bookies see it leeds are up there in the betting it wouldn't be good for blackwell if he sold King Billy to leeds and he scored shed loads of goals and they finished higher than them, but i think sheff u would be confident of finishing above us (very foolish)

thoughts anyone



(want to hide these ads? Join the VSC today!)

kybone

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 57
Re:King Billy
« Reply #1 on May 18, 2010, 05:35:25 pm by kybone »
So your point is that you think sheff u will only sell billy to a club that they think they will finish above next season? Im not sure that clubs think that way when selling players to be honest. Im also quite sure that billy will have the final say in where he goes and although he liked it here he would struggle to turn down the likes of leeds who could realistically be in the prem in a couple of years. I think were clutching at straws now if this is the logic were using to suggest that he will be here next season.

jw2

  • Newbie
Re:King Billy
« Reply #2 on May 18, 2010, 06:25:56 pm by jw2 »
Sheff utd will accept the highest bidder. SIMPLE!    :dry:

watto-drfc

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 927
Re:King Billy
« Reply #3 on May 18, 2010, 07:54:11 pm by watto-drfc »
what happens if the highest bid comes from QPR and he dosn't want to play there.

jw2

  • Newbie
Re:King Billy
« Reply #4 on May 18, 2010, 09:22:30 pm by jw2 »
then he wont pen that contract and will either be sold to the second highest bidder or kept at sheff utd.

Herman Hessian

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 837
Re:King Billy
« Reply #5 on May 20, 2010, 09:05:54 am by Herman Hessian »
point of order: in a rovers context, the name King Billy refers to Mr Bremner - no-one else

thirty odd games on loan, albeit with a decent goalscoring return, does not equate to the contribution to the cause over nine seasons as (player and) manager !

Smeg

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 67
Re:King Billy
« Reply #6 on May 20, 2010, 09:33:28 am by Smeg »
Point of order seconded. As you were.

BillyStubbsTears

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 37372
Re:King Billy
« Reply #7 on May 20, 2010, 10:27:40 am by BillyStubbsTears »
Herman is almost right. There are several epithets which are legal protected at DRFC, and must not, under pain of prosecution, be used in relation to anyone else.

These include:

King Alick
Pancho
Kitch
Bren
Windy
Snod
Animal
Bruno
Legless

King Billy is, unfortunately, in a grey area.

For example, on more than one occasion the phrase, \"Oh for f**k's sake, not that 'king Billy Stubbs again\" was heard to echo around BV as the teams emerged from the tunnel.

Herman Hessian

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 837
Re:King Billy
« Reply #8 on May 20, 2010, 10:35:08 am by Herman Hessian »
hmmm - and on a similar tack didn't the tea lady with he damaged accoutrements at Plymouth also refer to \"that 'king Billy Whitehurst\" ?

oh - and while we're about the sanctity of certain names - i don't want to hear anyone being referred to as \"the monkey god\" or \"clownshoes\" other than the original bearers of the title, either....

BillyStubbsTears

  • VSC Member
  • Posts: 37372
Re:King Billy
« Reply #9 on May 20, 2010, 10:41:53 am by BillyStubbsTears »
Jesus wept. The thought of Billy Whitehurst damaging a lady's acoutrements. That raises mental images that I'd prefer not to have to deal with.

turnbull for england

  • Forum Member
  • Posts: 2030
Re:King Billy
« Reply #10 on May 20, 2010, 12:13:57 pm by turnbull for england »
easy for dennis?

 

TinyPortal © 2005-2012