0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
The Burton thing is interesting, I worked out at a school in Staffordshire when I left college at a place called Barton-Under-Needwood perhaps 3 miles up the road from Burton on Trent and about 10 miles max, from the Burton development site, the whole area around there was ready for this development and it seemed to stand still for years as a simple piece of green ground that was disused - I don't know really how well things have moved on since then - in theory the idea was great, an Ajax style grass roots academy or a Clairefontayne (spelling/name) where the cream of the British kids could go and be taught and coached properly. But maybe that's the crux of the problem - this development has been in place on paper or whatever for around 10 years, and I ain't sure how it's progressing! No decisiveness - if as a previous poster said that night in Germany changed their mentality about kids and grass roots -why the hell hasn't it happened here?
I started it about two and a half years ago, the second I found out he got the job.My main concerns were that he didn't have the man management skills to work with a group of players when the World Cup came around and motivate them in the six weeks or so that they would be in South Africa. I predicted that their would be fall-outs and spats in the England camp, and by and large I think I've been proved right.I also said time and time again during the qualifiers and successful friendlies that England won, that we'd proved nothing and we wouldn't win the World Cup - or reach the semi-finals that were the target!Okay, my head's getting a bit big now, but you get the point. Think I've been proved right. The only thing that surprises me is just how shambolic the England team have been in their four games in the tournament. I'd say for at least 80%-85% of actual game time, we've been easily the second best team in our games. Pathetic.
I would like to hear O'Driscoll's views on England's failure in the World Cup. With his philosophies on football and how he likes the game to be played, I think he would have some intersting opinions.
Or how about chosing the England team from England-based players regardless of nationality? That appears to be what the Germans have done with their Turkish/Polish/Ghanaian army.
You have a far greater chance of succeeding as a footballer in this country if you happen to be born earlier in the school year. Those kids with a September birthday have grown more and are likely to be better athletically than kids with a late birthday. Our youth football is so concerned with results and physicality that the younger kids are simply barged out of the way. Smaller talented kids also tend to be ignored and lost to the game before they have chance to develop properly.And we just don't do enough to concentrate on the basic skills throughout kids football anyway. The problem is deep seated and I have very little faith in the FAs current approach to improving things.I'm all for initiatives such as footsal and small sided games. For instance I believe it's the Dutch don't allow young children to play in competitive leagues, they believe that kind of competition at a young age is actually detrimental.
River Don wrote:QuoteYou have a far greater chance of succeeding as a footballer in this country if you happen to be born earlier in the school year. Those kids with a September birthday have grown more and are likely to be better athletically than kids with a late birthday. Our youth football is so concerned with results and physicality that the younger kids are simply barged out of the way. Smaller talented kids also tend to be ignored and lost to the game before they have chance to develop properly.And we just don't do enough to concentrate on the basic skills throughout kids football anyway. The problem is deep seated and I have very little faith in the FAs current approach to improving things.I'm all for initiatives such as footsal and small sided games. For instance I believe it's the Dutch don't allow young children to play in competitive leagues, they believe that kind of competition at a young age is actually detrimental.I agree totally with this, RD.I'm a coach of an U7s side, the youngest that kids can play for a team. There is no competitive league (in fact, there are only friendlies up to u11s), although the DDJSFL organise a league season of matches, and managers of clubs want to win at all costs. The idea that this is an opportunity to coach kids PROPER developmental skills at the time when they are most receptive to them is lost. I see coaches who see the team not winning as a bad reflection on them. I also see parents who believe their little Johnny is going to be the next Rooney or Messi, and place ridiculous levels of EXPECTATION on them rather than just supporting their child's FOOTBALL EDUCATION.I've just been on the FA's Level 1 coaching course, and the focus is now all about first touch, finding the pass, supporting play by having awareness of space, etc. Barely any of the drills are about shooting or scoring goals. Maybe the sands are finally starting to shift at the top, but it will be a long time before everyone is on the same page.
The land is flat but the people are rounded in the Netherlands. Clubs do not throw kids on the scrapheap if they do not make the grade. If Groningen decide a youth player is not good enough, the club are duty-bound by their agreement with the KNVB to find him an amateur one. The whole ethos is on caring for the children. “We have a way of educating players,” Jeltema said. “It’s not all about winning.”
They also have an age group and technical co-ordinator and more qualified coaches, with parents having little influence.
It is not rocket science, but the idea that winning is not everything is anathema to the English.