Another excellent prediction

[wilts rover]

It makes my piss boil when people are too lazy to read the whole of an article - or deliberately misquote from it:

Gerry Northwood says countries will need to co-operate with each other, as well as with the commercial shipping sector, to be successful.
"There is value in these patrols, in terms of maintaining law and order on the high seas," he said.
However, the only real solution to the problem is to improve conditions ashore, while ensuring the criminal networks "do not have any targets", he added.
For pirates off the Somali coast, this means protecting vulnerable ships. But in the Mediterranean it means working to stop the flow of migrants.
"Anything you do at sea is effectively a sticking plaster," he said.
"Until you actually stop the migrants coming off, or being able to come off in the first place, you are limited in the degree to which you can solve this problem.

[Nudga]

I would suggest that our meddling in the middle east has played a massive part in this IS catastrophe.
Saddam Hussain and Gaddafi more or less kept their house in order before western greed for oil toppled them. This paved the way for IS as these countries are now completely lawless.
Blowing little boats out of the water and leaflet dropping won't stop this mess. This is heading for WW3 and it need the west and countries like Iran, Saudi and UAE to unite to defeat IS. It will take at least 1 million soldiers on the ground to crush IS. If and when this can be done, then the migrants might have some hope of living peacefully in their own country.
But I fear that ancient religious thinking will do away with any hope of stabilising the middle east. They need to come out of the dark age and medieval mindset of an eye for eye to move forward. It won't happen!

[IC1967]

It makes my piss boil when people are too lazy to read the whole of an article - or deliberately misquote from it:

Gerry Northwood says countries will need to co-operate with each other, as well as with the commercial shipping sector, to be successful.
"There is value in these patrols, in terms of maintaining law and order on the high seas," he said.
However, the only real solution to the problem is to improve conditions ashore, while ensuring the criminal networks "do not have any targets", he added.
For pirates off the Somali coast, this means protecting vulnerable ships. But in the Mediterranean it means working to stop the flow of migrants.
"Anything you do at sea is effectively a sticking plaster," he said.
"Until you actually stop the migrants coming off, or being able to come off in the first place, you are limited in the degree to which you can solve this problem.

However, the only real solution to the problem is to improve conditions ashore, while ensuring the criminal networks "do not have any targets", he added.

I ignored this bit because it is unadulterated pie in the sky waffle.

As you have copied his crap plan can you please explain how you improve conditions ashore? How do you ensure the criminal networks ''do not have any target"? What a load of claptrap. The man should be a Labour politician.

There is only one workable plan and I have come up with it. You lefties need to harden the feck up and accept a small loss of life to prevent massive loss of life.

Thank goodness Churchill wasn't a leftie. Like me he knew the value of a small sacrifice for the greater good.

Now provide some proper answers to the crap plan you've copied or get on with an abject apology

[IC1967]

I would suggest that our meddling in the middle east has played a massive part in this IS catastrophe.
Saddam Hussain and Gaddafi more or less kept their house in order before western greed for oil toppled them. This paved the way for IS as these countries are now completely lawless.
Blowing little boats out of the water and leaflet dropping won't stop this mess. This is heading for WW3 and it need the west and countries like Iran, Saudi and UAE to unite to defeat IS. It will take at least 1 million soldiers on the ground to crush IS. If and when this can be done, then the migrants might have some hope of living peacefully in their own country.
But I fear that ancient religious thinking will do away with any hope of stabilising the middle east. They need to come out of the dark age and medieval mindset of an eye for eye to move forward. It won't happen!

We should bow out and let them get on with killing each other. While-ever they all believe in their version of a non-existent God there is no hope for them. Nothing we can do about it and it's time we realised it.

Nothing will change until they cop themselves on and realise believing in 'God' is a massive con. This will take decades if not centuries. In the meantime we need to shut the borders and force them to sort it out themselves. Running away from their problems to Europe is the easy way out. It has to stop.

[wilts rover]

Now you are really making my piss boil. You said, post 56, you would be grateful if I answered your question. I answered your question. Is that rude reply what you call gratitude?

I have answered your question - now you go back and answer mine and explain your quote:

If we were out (of the EU) we'd be able to forget about the migrant crisis.

[IC1967]

Now you are really making my piss boil. You said, post 56, you would be grateful if I answered your question. I answered your question. Is that rude reply what you call gratitude?

I have answered your question - now you go back and answer mine and explain your quote:

If we were out (of the EU) we'd be able to forget about the migrant crisis.

You haven't answered the question. All you've done is regurgitated a crap plan that doesn't make any sense. I've asked you pertinent questions as to how your copied plan would work. You haven't answered because your copied plan is the typical politician's answer that doesn't get to the heart of the problem. I asked for a workable plan. No way is your copied plan workable. If you think it is then you need to answer my questions. If you don't (no surprise there then) we will all assume it is unworkable and as I said unadulterated pie in the sky waffle.

If we were out of the EU we could control our own borders and stop people coming in like economic migrants. There'd be no need for us to sink a few boats. The EU could sort things out. After all we're hardly the closest country to the problem are we? Aren't people supposed to go to the nearest safe country when fleeing war or persecution? We are not the closest safe country. We are already full. We shouldn't be borrowing money to bring these people here, the vast majority of which are economic migrants.

100% record still intact.

[wilts rover]

You really dont ever read whot u rite do you. Give up now, with every post you make yourself look sillier and sillier.
I said, on the other thread, there is no solution to this problem, illegal migration from Africa, until the problems in Africa are sorted. Captain Gerry Northwood (RN retired) agrees with me. What is the heart of the problem. The African economy. Who do you say these people are... the vast majority of which are economic migrants.
So you say I haven't got to the heart of the problem - and then agree with me on what the heart of the problem is!! Unbelievable Jeff! My piss has boiled so much the gauge has fallen off.....

The EU allows for free movement of European citizens. These people are economic migrants from Africa who enter illegally. We would be more at risk if we left the EU because now the southern Med countries have a duty to stop them reaching us - where as if we left they could just as well point the ones they catch in our direction.

I shall require an abject apology for both of your false statements thank you very much.

[BobG]

You know what, even though I've got our Resident Idiot blocked, I can see when he posts. And in the space of a page and a half he's replied to hismelf no less than 4 times. He's even replied three times! So what does this suggest about his level of intelligence?

I'll tell you: he can't organise his arguments into any coherent whole. He rushes to paper before thinking where he is going. He has a stream of consciousness sort of mind. or butterfly if you prefer. My psychologist mate says his mind is deeply troubled. me? I just think he's so dim he hasn't learned how to write properly yet. I don't think he ever will now. As he has proved, over a long period, unable to listen to well meant and good adcice, he clearly thinks he's above ordinary mortals. So that makes him egotistical, power crazed and probably psychotic too.

I do think Coventry would do him a shed load of good.... He needs help somehow. In all these years I have never seen anybody reply to his own post THREE times before! Our Resident Idiot has made replying to himself a daily habit. He'll stay a butterfly brain until he learns how to take a deep look at himself.

BobG

BobG

[IC1967]

You know what, even though I've got our Resident Idiot blocked, I can see when he posts. And in the space of a page and a half he's replied to hismelf no less than 4 times. He's even replied three times! So what does this suggest about his level of intelligence?

I'll tell you: he can't organise his arguments into any coherent whole. He rushes to paper before thinking where he is going. He has a stream of consciousness sort of mind. or butterfly if you prefer. My psychologist mate says his mind is deeply troubled. me? I just think he's so dim he hasn't learned how to write properly yet. I don't think he ever will now. As he has proved, over a long period, unable to listen to well meant and good adcice, he clearly thinks he's above ordinary mortals. So that makes him egotistical, power crazed and probably psychotic too.

I do think Coventry would do him a shed load of good.... He needs help somehow. In all these years I have never seen anybody reply to his own post THREE times before! Our Resident Idiot has made replying to himself a daily habit. He'll stay a butterfly brain until he learns how to take a deep look at himself.

BobG

BobG

Hahahahahahaha!!! You do make me laugh daft Bob.

You say I haven't learned how to write properly yet. Pot, kettle, black. Resident Idiot should not be started with a capital letter. It should be 'resident idiot'. hismelf should be spelt himself. You say I've replied to myself no less than 4 times  then in the next breath say THREE times. This should be 4 times and 3 times or four times and three times. You shouldn't be mixing the way you write numbers like that. Also what you have written is gibberish. Is it 3 times or is it no less than 4 times? Make your mind up. Can't you count?

Your statement is also patently untrue. I reply to other posters, not to myself. How you think you can work out that I'm replying to myself when you don't even read my posts (allegedly) is a mystery to me.

I do not rush to paper. I write nothing down on paper. It's just me, my computer and keyboard. or butterfly should be Or butterfly. You obviously don't know that a sentence should start with a capital letter. me? should be Me? As he has proved, over a long period, unable to listen to well meant and good advice, is very poorly constructed. It is gibberish.

Why do you also feel the need to sign off twice when you usually only do it once?

My standard of writing is far superior to yours as is my intellect. It beggars belief that you would criticise me for this in such a poorly constructed, mistake ridden post. What a clown.

Look. If you get an abject apology sorted pronto, I'll give you the opportunity to take down your daft post and I'll do the same, to save you from further ridicule.

Get on with it man. You know you should.

IC1967

[Iberian Red]

You are Peter Tatchell and I claim my five pounds.

[IC1967]

You really dont ever read whot u rite do you. Give up now, with every post you make yourself look sillier and sillier.
I said, on the other thread, there is no solution to this problem, illegal migration from Africa, until the problems in Africa are sorted. Captain Gerry Northwood (RN retired) agrees with me. What is the heart of the problem. The African economy. Who do you say these people are... the vast majority of which are economic migrants.
So you say I haven't got to the heart of the problem - and then agree with me on what the heart of the problem is!! Unbelievable Jeff! My piss has boiled so much the gauge has fallen off.....

The EU allows for free movement of European citizens. These people are economic migrants from Africa who enter illegally. We would be more at risk if we left the EU because now the southern Med countries have a duty to stop them reaching us - where as if we left they could just as well point the ones they catch in our direction.

I shall require an abject apology for both of your false statements thank you very much.

Excuse me. You're the one that doesn't read what they write as you consistently write gibberish and make numerous grammatical errors.

Let's cut to the chase. You offer up a crap copied plan. When pressed on it you say there is no solution to the problem.

But there is! My plan.

Now get an abject apology sorted for wasting our time reading your drivel.

Get on with it man. You'll feel so much better.

100% record intact.

[wilts rover]

That's rite keep on ignorin where I embarass u and show how much u contradict yourself, and then try and change the subject again, no one will notice...

[Glyn_Wigley]

You say I haven't learned how to write properly yet. Pot, kettle, black. Resident Idiot should not be started with a capital letter.

What an own goal. Proper nouns are capitalised.

[BobG]

Thank you Glyn.

Our Resident Idiot shows up his vast, unlimited, ignorance once again.

Got it Mick? Good! Get in! I'll expect the usual grovelling apology you so often demand.

BobG

[IC1967]

You say I haven't learned how to write properly yet. Pot, kettle, black. Resident Idiot should not be started with a capital letter.

What an own goal. Proper nouns are capitalised.

Hahahahahahaha! Resident Idiot is not a proper noun. It is a slur on my character. It can't be both.

Now what about the rest of the poorly put together drivel daft Bob spouted? I notice you ignored all that. What a plank. Defending your mate over the indefensible.

[IC1967]

Thank you Glyn.

Our Resident Idiot shows up his vast, unlimited, ignorance once again.

Got it Mick? Good! Get in! I'll expect the usual grovelling apology you so often demand.

BobG

Hahahahahaha! You never fail to let us down daft Bob. Or should that be Daft Bob? Are you a proper noun or are you just a bitter and twisted old man?

Have you been through your post where you criticised me for not being able to write properly? That post is the best laugh I've had for ages. It is so full of mistakes it is clearly you that can't write properly.

Keep it up. We all do enjoy a good laugh at your expense.

IC1967

[BobG]

Surely not two replies yet again Mick??!! Verbal diarroeah is it mate?

BobG

[Glyn_Wigley]

You say I haven't learned how to write properly yet. Pot, kettle, black. Resident Idiot should not be started with a capital letter.

What an own goal. Proper nouns are capitalised.

Hahahahahahaha! Resident Idiot is not a proper noun. It is a slur on my character. It can't be both.

Now what about the rest of the poorly put together drivel daft Bob spouted? I notice you ignored all that. What a plank. Defending your mate over the indefensible.

All titles are proper nouns, and therefore capitalised. Nice of you to confirm that you are the most fitting recipient of said title.

[IC1967]

You say I haven't learned how to write properly yet. Pot, kettle, black. Resident Idiot should not be started with a capital letter.

What an own goal. Proper nouns are capitalised.

Hahahahahahaha! Resident Idiot is not a proper noun. It is a slur on my character. It can't be both.

Now what about the rest of the poorly put together drivel daft Bob spouted? I notice you ignored all that. What a plank. Defending your mate over the indefensible.

All titles are proper nouns, and therefore capitalised. Nice of you to confirm that you are the most fitting recipient of said title.

We'll just have to agree to disagree on that one. I've highlighted in bold the bit you've ignored. Why can't you be like me and answer every question? Your current answer rate is running at about 8.976%.

As for me? 100% record intact.

Come on man. Get on with it.

[BobG]

Is it congenital Mick? Your inability to accept anything that's not in your lexicon? It's a sad weakness mate. Makes you look a reight w anker.

BobG

[Glyn_Wigley]

You say I haven't learned how to write properly yet. Pot, kettle, black. Resident Idiot should not be started with a capital letter.

What an own goal. Proper nouns are capitalised.

Hahahahahahaha! Resident Idiot is not a proper noun. It is a slur on my character. It can't be both.

Now what about the rest of the poorly put together drivel daft Bob spouted? I notice you ignored all that. What a plank. Defending your mate over the indefensible.

All titles are proper nouns, and therefore capitalised. Nice of you to confirm that you are the most fitting recipient of said title.

We'll just have to agree to disagree on that one. I've highlighted in bold the bit you've ignored. Why can't you be like me and answer every question? Your current answer rate is running at about 8.976%.

As for me? 100% record intact.

Come on man. Get on with it.

What about it? I was only commenting on your cock-up. I presume you're going to agree to disagree with every dictionary definition of proper noun too, or are you going to maintain they're wrong too?

[IC1967]

Now what about the rest of the poorly put together drivel daft Bob spouted?

Come on man. Defend your friend.

If you don't, we'll all know why. It's indefensible.

100% record intact.

Now get on with it.

[IC1967]

Is it congenital Mick? Your inability to accept anything that's not in your lexicon? It's a sad weakness mate. Makes you look a reight w anker.

BobG

Is it congenital? I'd answer that question but first you'll need to elaborate on what you're on about. I'm guessing your poorly constructed second sentence is what you're getting at. I'm guessing you're talking about proper nouns. If so, this is how you should have expressed yourself.

'Is your inability to accept anything that's not in your lexicon congenital, specifically proper nouns?' 

I've used fewer words and have been crystal clear in what I was trying to get across. You could learn a thing or two from me.

If I've read you right, the answer is no.

100% record intact.

By the way, would you prefer me to refer to you as daft Bob or Daft Bob?

IC1967

[BobG]

tut tut tut Mick. Talking to yourself again I see.

Get some help lad. You need it.

BobG

[IC1967]

tut tut tut Mick. Talking to yourself again I see.

Get some help lad. You need it.

BobG

Look. That first tut should have had a capital t i.e. T. It's basic grammar to start a sentence with a capital letter. I'll keep an eye on what you post and point out any errors so one day you can be nearly as good as me at expressing yourself.

IC1967

[BobG]

Along with being our Resident Idiot (note the correct use of capital letters Mick) you still exhibit all the symptoms of being one of Pavlov's dogs too. Its absolutely guaranteed. Your posts exhibit an unerring rhythm. Very Pavlovian.

Poor lad. I dont suppose you've got a clue have you? Our Resident Idiot doesn't know very much.

BobG

[Glyn_Wigley]

Now what about the rest of the poorly put together drivel daft Bob spouted?

Come on man. Defend your friend.

If you don't, we'll all know why. It's indefensible.

100% record intact.

Now get on with it.

Why should I? it's his opinion. not mine. You won't even defend your own opinion, you have to try deflecting as usual. You can't even respond to my last post with anything other than this flummery.

[IC1967]

Now what about the rest of the poorly put together drivel daft Bob spouted?

Come on man. Defend your friend.

If you don't, we'll all know why. It's indefensible.

100% record intact.

Now get on with it.

Why should I? it's his opinion. not mine. You won't even defend your own opinion, you have to try deflecting as usual. You can't even respond to my last post with anything other than this flummery.

I see. Being a bit selective in which bits of posts of your friends you'll defend. I get it.

Right. It looks like you need help with your grammar as well. Your third sentence should start with a capital letter (bit of a massive own goal there if you don't mind me saying). Your fourth sentence is poorly constructed. There is no need for as many words. You should have written 'You won't even defend your own opinion, you try deflecting as usual.'

Now get on with admitting daft Bob's post was full of errors. If you don't, we'll all assume you couldn't find fault with it and are as illiterate as he is.

[BobG]

There you go Mick. Right on cue. You are just so, so, so predictable. It's really quite boring. Mind you, as our Resident Idiot (and do note the correct use of capital letters Mick - one day you might just learn it) it's not really very surprising is it?

Cheers

BobG

[IC1967]

There you go Mick. Right on cue. You are just so, so, so predictable. It's really quite boring. Mind you, as our Resident Idiot (and do note the correct use of capital letters Mick - one day you might just learn it) it's not really very surprising is it?

Cheers

BobG