0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: hoolahoop on April 07, 2018, 06:42:07 pmI'm not quite sure what to make of that are you ?I have filed it away with the contradictions that May gave in her speech when she said 130 people had been treated for the effects of the poisoning, around about the same time the consultant doctor wrote to the Times to say that only 3 people were under treatment and no other member of the public they had seen had any symptoms whatsoever.What's the truth in this case, I don't know? But the more I read about it the less I believe we are being told it.
I'm not quite sure what to make of that are you ?
Quote from: wilts rover on April 07, 2018, 08:47:08 pmQuote from: hoolahoop on April 07, 2018, 06:42:07 pmI'm not quite sure what to make of that are you ?I have filed it away with the contradictions that May gave in her speech when she said 130 people had been treated for the effects of the poisoning, around about the same time the consultant doctor wrote to the Times to say that only 3 people were under treatment and no other member of the public they had seen had any symptoms whatsoever.What's the truth in this case, I don't know? But the more I read about it the less I believe we are being told it.The situation with the family pets is alarming,how embarrassing for the Wiltshire Police et al if it's true.The latest version of the story is that the Skripals were poisoned in their home, You would have thought the pets would have been taken away to be Monitored,I really do hope this is fake news!
SprotyAstonishingly, I, like the rest of the U.N., don’t have a solution in my back pocket. What I do have is an understanding from history of where you get to in the long run when strong men push and push and are not pushed back against. Thanks for the lesson on how Syria started. I hadn’t realised that it was complicated.
So Russia has vetoed a proposed UN investigation into Douma. The OPCW will be able to establish THAT a chemical weapon attack took place but there will be no way of definitively establishing who was responsible. Because Russia has blocked that avenue. So now what do those people think, who said we shouldn’t rush to judge Russia and we should let the UN do its job?
No, it because one was captured on live tv by the world media and the other requires proper investigation by the relevant authority who can definitively say what happened (as they should have done in Salisbury).Note the wording in this press release from the OPCW ' alleged use of chemical weapons'.THE HAGUE, Netherlands — 9 April 2018 — The Director-General of Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW), Ambassador Ahmet Üzümcü, expressed his grave concern in response to the alleged chemical weapons attack on 7 April in Douma, Syrian Arab Republic.The OPCW Situation Centre has been closely monitoring the incident and made a preliminary analysis of the reports of the alleged use of chemical weapons immediately after they were issued. The Fact Finding Mission (FFM) is in the process of gathering further information from all available sources to establish whether chemical weapons were used. The FFM will report its findings to States Parties to the Chemical Weapons Convention.https://reliefweb.int/report/syrian-arab-republic/opcw-director-general-allegations-chemical-weapons-use-douma-syria
Ok Billy ,what do you want to see happen, tell us why it should happen that way and what it would achieve,Put up or shut up!
Quote from: BillyStubbsTears on April 11, 2018, 10:28:06 amSo Russia has vetoed a proposed UN investigation into Douma. The OPCW will be able to establish THAT a chemical weapon attack took place but there will be no way of definitively establishing who was responsible. Because Russia has blocked that avenue. So now what do those people think, who said we shouldn’t rush to judge Russia and we should let the UN do its job?Thats my whole point in the other thread, the UN as it stands is toothless while nations have the power of veto