0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: DonnyBazR0ver on January 17, 2020, 10:43:46 amThat's not an unreasonable reflection of what happened at the time from Dickov. Spin and appeasing fans is all part of the job as he acknowledges. We always have to understand that whatever the budget is, the manager's job is to utilise it to the best of his ability. He shouldn't be going to the board every 5 minutes and asking for more. That said, it's not easy for any manager at any club it's an all consuming job. He confirmed there that the wage bill had got out of hand and it had to be cut. JR knew that, all 3 of them knew that. When JR resigns then that leaves a hole to be filled and that doesn't happen by magic or by putting the club at risk with taking even more risks.To make up for the loss of income the club had to look at other income streams and Club Doncaster has made up for that in some way and is a sound way of generating income and turnover we wouldn't otherwise get. There are other community aspects of Club Dincaster, the foundation and educational side that largely goes unnoticed. Back to the concept of top 6 budget, something I've always been uncomfortable with as it's ambiguous and could be misinterpreted. Whatever mechanism the owners have set up to fund the club is ok by me as you need some serious wealth to generate in excess of £1m a year each, to give freely to the club and underwrite any additional losses on top of that.The club, just like other clubs and in other industries, will always try to put positive spin on things for obvious reasons and most folk understand that and accept that because what we see for what we pay on a Saturday afternoon is acceptable. I'm enjoying the football just as much this season as I did the last, the season before, when we were in the Championship and when we were in the Conference. It's all relative.Until some other investor comes along who wants to put more money in, things are not going to change much anytime soon. The choice is ours whether to buy our tickets. I for one still think I'm getting good value for money.that's a fair post. I would say though that what the club say their approach is does not follow on in terms of actions leading to becoming a sustainable model. Managers leaving apart, i can see no evidence over the last three years where the footballing side has been made more sustainable. They have said they need to look at putting out longer contracts for their managers rather than the rolling contract, no sign of that yet for the amazing job DM is doing with the limited resources he has etc etc
That's not an unreasonable reflection of what happened at the time from Dickov. Spin and appeasing fans is all part of the job as he acknowledges. We always have to understand that whatever the budget is, the manager's job is to utilise it to the best of his ability. He shouldn't be going to the board every 5 minutes and asking for more. That said, it's not easy for any manager at any club it's an all consuming job. He confirmed there that the wage bill had got out of hand and it had to be cut. JR knew that, all 3 of them knew that. When JR resigns then that leaves a hole to be filled and that doesn't happen by magic or by putting the club at risk with taking even more risks.To make up for the loss of income the club had to look at other income streams and Club Doncaster has made up for that in some way and is a sound way of generating income and turnover we wouldn't otherwise get. There are other community aspects of Club Dincaster, the foundation and educational side that largely goes unnoticed. Back to the concept of top 6 budget, something I've always been uncomfortable with as it's ambiguous and could be misinterpreted. Whatever mechanism the owners have set up to fund the club is ok by me as you need some serious wealth to generate in excess of £1m a year each, to give freely to the club and underwrite any additional losses on top of that.The club, just like other clubs and in other industries, will always try to put positive spin on things for obvious reasons and most folk understand that and accept that because what we see for what we pay on a Saturday afternoon is acceptable. I'm enjoying the football just as much this season as I did the last, the season before, when we were in the Championship and when we were in the Conference. It's all relative.Until some other investor comes along who wants to put more money in, things are not going to change much anytime soon. The choice is ours whether to buy our tickets. I for one still think I'm getting good value for money.
DBR that last line is a huge understatement. There are many fans across the country who will look at us with considerable envy at how well run a club we are.
Quote from: Campsall rover on January 17, 2020, 01:38:32 pmDBR that last line is a huge understatement. There are many fans across the country who will look at us with considerable envy at how well run a club we are. Of course Don’t doubt that for a second, there’s some very badly run clubs. By the same token though there’s clubs that we can aspire to, Brentford, Bournemouth, Burnley, Wigan etc
How exactly is the recruitment process 'shambolic'? Is it just because the club keep their cards close to their chest instead of telling you everything?
Quote from: dickos1 on January 17, 2020, 02:12:55 pmQuote from: Campsall rover on January 17, 2020, 01:38:32 pmDBR that last line is a huge understatement. There are many fans across the country who will look at us with considerable envy at how well run a club we are. Of course Don’t doubt that for a second, there’s some very badly run clubs. By the same token though there’s clubs that we can aspire to, Brentford, Bournemouth, Burnley, Wigan etc They are mainly unrealistic aspirations. Certainly Bournemouth and Wigan have in recent history been entirely propped up by massive owner subsidy on a colossal scale. Brentford owner has an odd model that has for many years had salaries running way over income and demanding 100m plus of his investment. Burnley I don’t know. We can aspire to be Barnsley or Rotherham.
Got ourselves a great manager but looking at his comments today looks like he's starting to become frustrated with whats going on behind the scenes. Fergie walked out, as did McCann, and if we're not careful so will Moore.It's as clear as day now that what we were fed by Baldwin about top 6 being the target and having one of the best budgets in the league is total codswallop. We lost all our highest earners, got £2m for JM and got to the 5th round of the cup and Play Offs... where has that money gone??We've signed conference quality players to replace Marquis and seem to only be interested in loan deals. Nothing wrong with loans but there is when it's seemingly the only type of signing we want to make.Summer recruitment was bad enough, this month was the biggest transfer window I can remember (what a chance to go for promotion, poor league) and we're hearing from the manager that if we don't sign anyone he'll be frustrated, like it actually could happen!! Not to mention we've already lost 4 players! Absolutely unbelievable.
Brentford certainly wouldn't be allowed to have 110 million invested by their owner they would be breaking the ffp rules and as far as I know they haven’t been sanctioned for this. What I do know is Brentford over the last 2/3 years have recouped around 90 million quid from player sales and over the same period spent around a 3rd of that. Therefore as I said earlier their recruitment is outstanding, they’re still at the top end of the championship and are still finding players cheap and selling them on for fortunes. Brentford are definitely a club we can aspire to
I think the frustration is, we are constantly told we have a play off budget, but in the eyes of most, the quality of our team doesn’t match up to that. Disclaimer: This is an opinion.I believe at the moment DM is overachieving with what he has at his disposal. Most of our first XI are decent, but there are very few options beyond that to change a tight game, as demonstrated today. That’s the difference between an OK team and a good team.I would also question the club’s transfer policy (if there is one). It all seems to rely too heavily on the Manager, and there is a worrying tendency to believe that loans and quick fixes are the answer. To be honest (and I’ll be surprised if I’m alone) I’m sick of seeing the team built around loans. If they’re any good they will only go and sign for a higher/richer club when their loan is finished (a la Wilks, Kane, Downing), and if they’re no good we won’t want to keep them anyway. Is it beyond the wit of a bunch of very smart and savvy business people to see that we can turn a good profit on good players (such as Marquis) and then go on and find the next good player we can sign on a permanent and develop? There doesn’t seem to be that kind of succession planning in place.And before it’s said - Idah on an 18 month loan isn’t a long term solution either. At the end of it, he’s still not our player to sell or keep hold of.
Quote from: pib on January 18, 2020, 06:46:10 pmI think the frustration is, we are constantly told we have a play off budget, but in the eyes of most, the quality of our team doesn’t match up to that. Disclaimer: This is an opinion.I believe at the moment DM is overachieving with what he has at his disposal. Most of our first XI are decent, but there are very few options beyond that to change a tight game, as demonstrated today. That’s the difference between an OK team and a good team.I would also question the club’s transfer policy (if there is one). It all seems to rely too heavily on the Manager, and there is a worrying tendency to believe that loans and quick fixes are the answer. To be honest (and I’ll be surprised if I’m alone) I’m sick of seeing the team built around loans. If they’re any good they will only go and sign for a higher/richer club when their loan is finished (a la Wilks, Kane, Downing), and if they’re no good we won’t want to keep them anyway. Is it beyond the wit of a bunch of very smart and savvy business people to see that we can turn a good profit on good players (such as Marquis) and then go on and find the next good player we can sign on a permanent and develop? There doesn’t seem to be that kind of succession planning in place.And before it’s said - Idah on an 18 month loan isn’t a long term solution either. At the end of it, he’s still not our player to sell or keep hold of.We could have a top 6 budget and a poor squad though. Moore might have quite a big chunk left to spend this month.
the investment as I’m sure you’re aware will include the money he spent purchasing the club.Look at the accounts they lost less than 2 million last year, aren't our owners making up bigger deficits than this every year?People moan about folk on this forum but your manner and the way you talk to people is more than a little embarrassing. There’s not many posts at all made by you which don’t come across as someone attempting to act clever, I can read your posts and know straight away it was written by you without looking at the author. Usually a person attempting to talk down to people all smarmy, clever, have many issues. I only hope you can sort these out
I wonder if DM’s demise at WBA was down to being indecisive or stubborn?