0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Didn’t he do same in home game?And should have given a blatent pen away last year away?
No question whatsoever that was a DOGSO moment tonight. I wonder what the card would have been if the ball hadn't landed with Taylor.I also wonder whether there'd have been a red if their lad hadn't got a toe on the ball at the end of the first half, before he went studs-deep into Taylor's knee. Shocking challenge, that one. And he won the free kick!
How is it DOGSO when we went on to have a goal scoring opportunity?
Quote from: pib on January 24, 2020, 10:49:26 pmHow is it DOGSO when we went on to have a goal scoring opportunity?Reyt. THESE are the exchanges I like.It is self evident that the emergence of a second GSO does not preclude the existence of a prior DOGSO. Ozturk denied A GSO. The fact that a second GSO emerged from that action is, philosophically, of no import.
Actually this is a REYT philosophical can of worms.Are you saying that, if I go out tomorrow and randomly shoot someone, and, having struck them, the bullet ricochets and hits the doorbell of a doctor who rushes out and saves their life, I shouldn't be prosecuted?
If football allowed an advantage play that can be brought back, as in rugby, that might have worked..
Quote from: IDM on January 25, 2020, 08:31:12 amIf football allowed an advantage play that can be brought back, as in rugby, that might have worked..In terms of fair play and clarity the laws of rugby have been mentioned on more than one occasion on this forum and personally i've felt for a while that football could and should adopt some of them
Quote from: IDM on January 25, 2020, 08:31:12 amIf football allowed an advantage play that can be brought back, as in rugby, that might have worked..Football does allow advantage to be played in that way. It's down to referee if they choose to or not.