0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Not really, I look younger than him, and better looking, and had better work mates than him all my life.
Thinking about it everyone would have difficulty having worse work mates than poor old Stabber Starmer.
Syd, I don't even know anyone I would class as racist.you might be the nearest to a racist person because you are against the British people who voted democratically Tory and to exit the EU, and you have continually for six years shown your loathing and hatred of them , luckily I don't know you or really wish to. I expect a diatribe reply because you seem to think that the last post is a winner, and is usually an insult of some kind so crack on love.
Just listened to his speech on the radio at the Labour Party conference, it was boring ( Stabber comes over as a poor orator,) and he was being heckled by the parties own supporters, he has no chance the party is dying.
If Johnson and Starmer face off at the next GE it will be a battle of who is the least lying , untrustworthy snake of a man .
Tyke.Serious question. Why do you call Starmer "Keith"?
Sir Keir Starmer has outperformed Boris Johnson in his first in-person conference speech as Labour leader, according to an exclusive poll for Sky News.The poll by Opinium, conducted after the speech, found 63% of respondents agreed with what Sir Keir had to say, 57% said he came across as strong, 62% say it showed him as competent and 68% said it shows he cares about ordinary people.The numbers outperform Mr Johnson's first conference speech in 2019.After that speech, three months after he became PM, 51% agreed with what Mr Johnson had to say, 52% said it showed he was strong, 46% said he came across as competent and 37% said it showed him as caring about ordinary people.https://news.sky.com/story/starmer-outperforms-johnson-in-first-in-person-conference-speech-as-labour-leader-according-to-sky-news-poll-12421477
He isn't worthy of the name Keir , it's as simple as that .If you know your Labour history then it's not that hard to figure out .Unsurprisingly you had to ask .Says it all .
Quote from: tyke1962 on September 29, 2021, 10:18:38 pmWhy would it even bother you how I refer to him ?He's made himself plus Mandelson an political opponent .I get to call him what the hell I like under such circumstances .Keith has decided to make an enemy out of me .Nobody but nobody provoked this until Mandelson came along .I absolutely won't get in to line , feck him the lying , untrustworthy snake .He isn't worthy of the name Keir , it's as simple as that .If you know your Labour history then it's not that hard to figure out .Unsurprisingly you had to ask .Says it all .Then why not call him "Starmer" if that is what you believe?It's a serious question.Argue with the actual issues, by all means. Argue with the policies or the political philosophy. But by doing this, you opt out of grown up discussion and turn it into an act of argument by belittling. By engaging in that sort of playground name calling, you kind of make yourself look silly and you are better than that.
Why would it even bother you how I refer to him ?He's made himself plus Mandelson an political opponent .I get to call him what the hell I like under such circumstances .Keith has decided to make an enemy out of me .Nobody but nobody provoked this until Mandelson came along .I absolutely won't get in to line , feck him the lying , untrustworthy snake .He isn't worthy of the name Keir , it's as simple as that .If you know your Labour history then it's not that hard to figure out .Unsurprisingly you had to ask .Says it all .
I guess this doesn't make any difference to you byke as I know you must have read it a few times as an active political animal.''Starmer was born in London and raised in Surrey, where he attended the selective state Reigate Grammar School, which became an independent school while he was a student. He graduated with a Bachelor of Laws from the University of Leeds in 1985 and gained a postgraduate Bachelor of Civil Law degree at St Edmund Hall at the University of Oxford in 1986.After qualifying for the bar, Starmer acted exclusively as a defence lawyer, specialising in human rights issues as a member of Doughty Street Chambers, before being named a Queen's Counsel (QC) in 2002. In 2008, he became Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) and Head of the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), holding these roles until 2013. On conclusion of his five-year term as Director of Public Prosecutions, he was appointed Knight Commander of the Order of the Bath (KCB) in the 2014 New Year Honours'' Human rights, DPP what has he done to earn his place in society ................. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keir_Starmer
Quote from: SydneyRover on September 29, 2021, 11:21:53 pmI guess this doesn't make any difference to you byke as I know you must have read it a few times as an active political animal.''Starmer was born in London and raised in Surrey, where he attended the selective state Reigate Grammar School, which became an independent school while he was a student. He graduated with a Bachelor of Laws from the University of Leeds in 1985 and gained a postgraduate Bachelor of Civil Law degree at St Edmund Hall at the University of Oxford in 1986.After qualifying for the bar, Starmer acted exclusively as a defence lawyer, specialising in human rights issues as a member of Doughty Street Chambers, before being named a Queen's Counsel (QC) in 2002. In 2008, he became Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) and Head of the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), holding these roles until 2013. On conclusion of his five-year term as Director of Public Prosecutions, he was appointed Knight Commander of the Order of the Bath (KCB) in the 2014 New Year Honours'' Human rights, DPP what has he done to earn his place in society ................. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keir_StarmerI'm fully aware of his background which makes this thing even more difficult to understand .He's a lying untrustworthy snake , if you can make a case that he isn't then I'd be happy to see it another way .Make the case Sydney .
Yet another thread initiated by a persistent WUM with no other motive than to wind up certain individuals.No substance to the thread, no facts, no reasonable argument put forward, just a pathetic provocation which of course results in a predictable string of responses by its intended target(s) so that the originator can have his bit of fun.And once again the quality of the forum is degraded.I hope someone's happy.
Quote from: Pancho Regan on September 30, 2021, 01:14:03 pmYet another thread initiated by a persistent WUM with no other motive than to wind up certain individuals.No substance to the thread, no facts, no reasonable argument put forward, just a pathetic provocation which of course results in a predictable string of responses by its intended target(s) so that the originator can have his bit of fun.And once again the quality of the forum is degraded.I hope someone's happy.WUM? An ex-trade unionist and genuine socialist. No facts? No reasonable argument?Come on then; what's your opinion of Starmer's attempt to alienate the whole of the left in the Labour Party? What's your opinion of the fact that he practically wiped out the whole of the red wall in the North and North-East with the sh*te he spouted about a second referendum, when he was Shadow Brexit Secretary, making the next GE almost impossible to win under his leadership?Let's hear your reasonable argument.